Open Access

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN HIGH-STAKES MATHS TESTING. FINDINGS FROM POLAND


Cite

Angoff, W. H. (1993) Perspectives on Differential Item Functioning in Differential Item Functioning. In P. W. Holland & Howard Wainer (Eds.), Differential Item Functioning (pp. 3-25). New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Ayala de, R. J. (2013). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: Guilford Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Beller, M., & Gafni, N. (2000). Can item format (multiple choice vs. open-ended) account for gender differences in mathematics achievement? Sex Roles, 42(1-2), 1-21. 10.1023/A:1007051109754Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of educational psychology, 98(1), 198. 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198Search in Google Scholar

Doris, A., O’Neill, D., & Sweetman, O. (2013). Gender, single-sex schooling and maths achievement. Economics of Education Review, 35, 104-119. 10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Ellison, G., & Swanson, A. (2009). The gender gap in secondary school mathematics at high achievement levels: Evidence from the American Mathematics Competitions (No. w15238). National Bureau of Economic Research. 10.3386/w15238Search in Google Scholar

Fryer Jr, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2009). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics (No. w15430). National Bureau of Economic Research. Search in Google Scholar

Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 17-28. 10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Golia, S. (2012). Differential Item Functioning classification for polytomously scored items. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 5(3), 367-373. Search in Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2013). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. New York: Psychology press. 10.4324/9780203816530Search in Google Scholar

Henderson, D. L. (2001). Prevalence of Gender DIF in Mixed Format High School Exit Examinations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Seattle). Search in Google Scholar

Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (1986). Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Francisco). Search in Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S., & Mertz, J. E. (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(22), 8801-8807. 10.1073/pnas.0901265106Search in Google Scholar

Jurajda, S., & Munich, D. (2008). Gender Gap in Admission Performance under Competitive Pressure. CERGE-EI Working Paper Series, (371). 10.2139/ssrn.1483802Search in Google Scholar

Kling, K. C., Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2012). Why do standardized tests underpredict women’s academic performance? The role of conscientiousness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 600-606. 10.1177/1948550612469038Search in Google Scholar

Kosmala-Anderson, J. (2006). Płeć a natężenie i rodzaj psychosomatycznych reakcji na stres egzaminacyjny. Przegląd terapeutyczny 1/2006. Search in Google Scholar

Kondratek, B., & Grudniewska, M. (2014). Comparison of Mantel-Haenszel with IRT procedures for DIF detection and effect size estimation for dichotomous items. Edukacja Quarterly, 128(3). Search in Google Scholar

Kenney-Benson, G. A., Pomerantz, E. M., Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2006). Sex differences in math performance: The role of children’s approach to schoolwork. Developmental psychology, 42(1), 11. 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.11Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, J. P. (2014). Applied measurement with jMetrik. New York: Routledge. Ors, E., Palomino, F., & Peyrache, E. (2013). Performance gender gap: does competition matter? Journal of Labor Economics, 31(3), 443-499. 10.4324/9780203115190Search in Google Scholar

Stoet, G., & Geary D.C. (2013) Sex Differences in Mathematics and Reading Achievement Are Inversely Related: Within- and Across-Nation Assessment of 10 Years of PISA Data. PLoS ONE 8(3): e57988. 10.1371/journal.pone.0057988Search in Google Scholar

Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Can stereotype threat explain the gender gap in mathematics performance and achievement? Review of General Psychology, 16(1), 93. 10.1037/a0026617Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Skorska, P., & Świst, K. (2014). Wielkość efektu płci w wewnątrzszkolnych i zewnątrzszkolnych wskaźnikach osiągnięć ucznia. Konferencja PTDE. Search in Google Scholar

Świst, K., Skorska, P., Koniewski, M., & Jasińska-Maciążek, A. (2015). Sex differences in guessing and item omission. Edukacja, 3, 48-62. Search in Google Scholar

Szaleniec, H., Kondratek, B., Kulon, F., Pokropek, A., Skorska, P., Świst, K., & Żołtak, M. (2015). Porownywalne wyniki egzaminacyjne. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych. Search in Google Scholar

Jakubowski, M., & Pokropek, A. (2009). Badając egzaminy: Podejście ilościowe w badaniach edukacyjnych. Centralna Komisja Egzaminacyjna. Search in Google Scholar

Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 136(6), 1123. 10.1037/a0021276Search in Google Scholar

Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1067-1101. 10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2010). Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 129-144. 10.1257/jep.24.2.129Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Penner, A. M. (2008). Gender differences in extreme mathematical achievement: An international perspective on biological and social factors. American Journal of Sociology 114: S138-S170. Search in Google Scholar

PISA, O. (2012). Results in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. [2014-12-03]. Search in Google Scholar

Robinson-Cimpian, J. P., Lubienski, S. T., Ganley, C. M., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of students’ mathematics proficiency may exacerbate early gender gaps in achievement. Developmental psychology, 50(4), 1262. 10.1037/a0035073Search in Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, D. I. (2012). Do gender differences in risk aversion explain the gender gap in SAT scores? Uncovering risk attitudes and the test score gap. Unpublished paper, University of Chicago, Chicago. Search in Google Scholar

Zwick, R., & Ercikan, K. (1989). Analysis of differential item functioning in the NAEP history assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(1), 55-66.10.1111/j.1745-3984.1989.tb00318.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2199-6059
ISSN:
0860-150X
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Philosophy, other