[ALI/UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedures. (2004). Retrieved from http://www.unidroit.org/english/principles/civilprocedure/ali-unidroitprinciples-e.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Andrews, N. (2005). The New English Civil Procedure Rules (1998). In C.H. van Rhee (Ed.), European Traditions in Civil Procedure, Antwerpen-Oxford: Intersentia, 161-181.]Search in Google Scholar
[Andrews, N. (2008). The Modern Civil Process: Judicial and Alternative Forms of Dispute Resolution in England. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck]Search in Google Scholar
[Andrews, N. (2012). The Three Paths of Justice: Court Proceedings, Arbitration, and Mediation in England. Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London-New York: Springer Science + Business Media.10.1007/978-94-007-2294-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Andrews, N. (2013). Civil Procedure. In A. Burrows (Ed.), English Private Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1324-1373.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arkuszewska, A.M. & Kościołek, A. (2012). Nowelizacja Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego - wybrane zagadnienia. Cz. 1. Przegląd Sądowy 5, 5-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Backer, I.L. (2007). The Norwegian reform of civil procedure. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 41-75.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cadiet, L. & Amrani-Mekki, S. (2008). Civil Procedure. In G.A. Bermann, E. Picard (Eds.), Introduction to French Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 307-332.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chase, O.G. & Varano, V. (2012). Comparative civil justice. In M. Bussani & U. Mattei (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 210-240.10.1017/CBO9781139017206.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Civil Procedure Rules 1998. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/3132/contents/made]Search in Google Scholar
[Clampitt, P.G., DeKoch, R.J. & Cashman, T. (2000). A strategy for communicating about uncertainty. Academy of Management Executive 14(4), 41-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Council Recommendations - “Promoting the use of and sharing of best practices on cross-border videoconferencing in the area of justice in the Member States and at EU level” (OJ C 250, 31.7.2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Czerwiński, A. (2015). Mediacja z punktu widzenia sędziego. Retrieved from http://caim.gov.pl/images/user_media/40/O%20mediacji/Nowe/Mediacja%20z%20punktu%20widzenia%20s%C4%99dziego.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Draft Strategy on European e-justice 2014-2018 (OJ C 376, 21.12.2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ekelöf, P.O. (1995). Scandinavian Countries. In M. Cappelletti (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Volume XVI. Civil Procedure. Ordinary Proceedings in First Instance. Tübingen & The Hague-Boston- London: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) & Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 189-210.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elliott C., Vernon C. & Jeanpierre E. (2006). French Legal System. Harlow: Pearson Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ervo, L. (2009). Characteristics of procedure. In L. Ervo (Ed.), Civil Justice in Finland. Nagoya University Comparative Study of Civil Justice Vol. 2. Tokyo: Jigakusha Publishing Corporation, 55-100.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ervo, L. (2014). East-Scandinavian court culture from the religious point of view - secularized or quasi secularized civil litigation? In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Court Culture - Contemporary Problems. Białystok Volumes on Law & Culture Vol. 1. Bialystok: Temida 2, 53-70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ervo, L. & Dahlqvist, A. (2014). Delays in civil proceedings: Comparative Studies Between Finland and Sweden, In L. Ervo, A. Nylund (Eds.), The Future of Civil Litigation: Access to Courts and Court-annexed Mediation in the Nordic Countries. Cham: Springer, 249-280.10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1_13]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonera, K. (2005). Przewlekłość postępowania w sprawach cywilnych. Przegląd Sądowy 11/12, 3-38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Górowski, J. (2014). Art. 207. In A. Marciniak, K. Piasecki (Eds.), Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom I. Komentarz. Art. 1-366. Warszawa: C.H. Beck, 881-888.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacob, J.I.H. (1987). The Fabric of English Civil Justice. London: Stevens & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jolowicz, J.A. (2000). On Civil Procedure. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511549540]Search in Google Scholar
[Karolczyk, B. (2013), Pretrial as a Part of Judicial Case Management in Poland in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Law Review, 15, 151-188.10.12775/CLR.2013.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Kay, M. (2012). (Ed.) Blackstone’s Civil Practice 2013: The Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kiurunen, P. & Lindstr¨om, N. (2012). Norway. In P.G. Karlsgodt (Ed.), World Class Actions: A Guide to Group and Representative Actions around the Globe. New York: Oxford University Press, 229-240.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kiurunen, P., Lindström, N. & Bylov Rath M. (2012). Denmark. In P.G. Karlsgodt (Ed.), World Class Actions: A Guide to Group and Representative Actions around the Globe. New York: Oxford University Press, 186-197.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kornai, J. (1995). Highway and Byways: Studies on Reform and Post-communist Transition. Cambridge-London: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kryzys wymiaru sprawiedliwości!!!. (2014, October 23). Retrieved from http://temidacontrasm.info/kyzys-wymiaru-sprawiedliwosci/]Search in Google Scholar
[Kunicki, I. (2008). Opinia na temat poselskiego projektu ustawy o zmianie ustawy - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego oraz niektorych innych ustaw (druk nr 112). Retrieved from http://orka.sejm.gov.pl/rexdomk6.nsf/0/0ED8F57D4CE900CFC12574CE0037995C/$file/i2467-08.rtf]Search in Google Scholar
[Łazarska, A. (2012). Sędziowskie kierownictwo postępowaniem. Przegląd Sądowy, 5, 50-75.]Search in Google Scholar
[Łętowska, E. (2010). Niedomagająca legitymizacja trzeciej władzy. Dodatek do Monitora Prawniczego, 3, 30-34.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mańko, R. (2014). European Small Claims Procedure Legal analysis of the Commission’s proposal to remedy weaknesses in the current system. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2014/542137/EPRS_IDA(2014)542137_REV1_EN.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Mańko, R. (2015). Reform of the European Small Claims Procedure: Legislation in progress. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/557014/EPRS_BRI(2015)557014_EN.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości (2015a). Sądy Okręgowe - Polska. MS-S1. Sprawozdanie w sprawach cywilnych. Retrieved from https://isws.ms.gov.pl/Data/Files/_public/isws/jednoroczne/2014/spr_zbior_2014/ms-s1o_2014.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości (2015b). Sądy Rejonowe - Polska. MS-S1. Sprawozdanie w sprawach cywilnych. Retrieved from https://isws.ms.gov.pl/Data/Files/_public/isws/jednoroczne/2014/spr_zbior_2014/ms-s1r_2014.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Modéer, K.Å. (2004). Delay and judicial culture in Sweden. In C.H. van Rhee (Ed.), The Law’s Delay: Essays on Undue Delay in Civil Litigation. Antwerpen- Groningen: Intersentia, 195-202.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murray, P.L. & Stürner, R. (2004). German Civil Justice. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niemi, J. (2010). Civil Procedure in Finland. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nylund, A. (2014). European Integration and Nordic Civil Procedure. In L. Ervo, A. Nylund (Eds.), The Future of Civil Litigation: Access to Courts and Court-annexed Mediation in the Nordic Countries. Cham: Springer, 31-51.10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Oberhammer, P. & Domej, T. (2010). Delay in Austrian Civil Procedure and the Legislator’s Response. In C.H. van Rhee (Ed.), Within a Reasonable Time. The History of Due and Undue Delay in Civil Litigation. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 57-73.10.2307/j.ctv1q69scv.15]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Reilly, C.A. & Pondy, L.R. (1979). Organizational communication. In S. Kerr (Ed.), Organizational behaviour. Columbus: Grid, 119-150.]Search in Google Scholar
[Orton, F. (2008). Some Special Features of Swedish Civil Procedure. Acta Juridica Hungarica, 49(3), 311-317.10.1556/AJur.49.2008.3.6]Search in Google Scholar
[Petersen, C.S. (2014). A comparative Perspective on Recent Nordic Reforms of Civil Justice. In L. Ervo, A. Nylund (Eds.), The Future of Civil Litigation: Access to Courts and Court-annexed Mediation in the Nordic Countries. Cham: Springer, 9-30.10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Piasecki, K. (1989). Przewlekłość sądowego postępowania w sprawach cywilnych - przyczyny i środki zaradcze. Nowe Prawo 4, 29-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Regulation (EU) 2015/2421 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure and Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 creating a European order for payment procedure (OJ L 341, 24.12.2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[van Rhee, C.H. (2004). (Ed.) The Law’s Delay: Essays on Undue Delay in Civil Litigation. Antwerpen-Groningen: Intersentia.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Rhee, C.H. (2012). Harmonisation of Civil Procedure: An Historical and Comparative Perspective. In X.E. Kramer, C.H. van Rhee (Eds.), Civil Litigation in a Globalising World. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 39-64.10.1007/978-90-6704-817-0_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Robberstad, A. (2012). Sivilprosess. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smolej, M. & Johnsen, J.T. (2007). Time management of justice systems: a Northern Europe study. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Storskrubb E. (2008). Civil Procedure and EU Law: A Policy Area Uncovered. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199533176.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Strus-Wołos, M. (2013). Możliwości składania wnioskow dowodowych przez pełnomocnikow poza pierwszym pismem. In J. Giezek, A. Malicki (Eds.), Adwokatura a modele procedur sądowych. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 189-196.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sunnqvist,M. (2012). Loser Pays - But Only a Reasonable Amount. InM. Reimann (Ed.), Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: A Comparative Study. Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London-New York: Springer, 267-274.10.1007/978-94-007-2263-7_24]Search in Google Scholar
[The 2015 EU Justice Scoreboard (2015). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/effective-justice/files/justice_scoreboard_2015_en.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[The truth about civil cases (2015, October 9). Retrieved from http://open.justice.gov.uk/courts/civil-cases/]Search in Google Scholar
[Tokarczyk, R. (2008). Komparatystyka prawnicza. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ustawa z 17 listopada 1964 r. - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego, tekst jedn. Dz.U. z 2014 r., poz. 101, z poźn. zm.]Search in Google Scholar
[Uzelac, A. (2010). Survival of the Third Legal Tradition? Supreme Court Law Review 49, 377-396.]Search in Google Scholar
[Uzelac, A. (2014a). Delays and Backlogs in Civil Procedure. A (South East) European Perspective. Revista De Processo 238, 39-64.]Search in Google Scholar
[Uzelac, A. (2014b). (Ed.) Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial Systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-319-03443-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Uzelac, A. (2014c). Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary World. In A. Uzelac (Ed.), Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial Systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 3-34.10.1007/978-3-319-03443-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Werlauff, E. (2010). Civil Procedure in Denmark. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wojciechowski, B. (2010). Discourse Ethics as a Basis of the Application of Law. In J. Jemielniak, P. Mikłaszewicz (Eds.), Interpretation of Law in the Global World: From Particularism to a Universal Approach. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 53-70.10.1007/978-3-642-04886-9_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Zieliński, A. (2014). Art. 207. In A. Zieliński (Ed.), Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Warszawa: C.H. Beck, 434-436.]Search in Google Scholar
[Żyznowski, T. (2013). Art. 207. In H. Dolecki, T. Wiśniewski (Eds.), Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom I. Artykuły 1-366. Warszawa:Wolters Kluwer, 780-787.]Search in Google Scholar