Open Access

Polish Preparatory Proceedings in Civil Cases: Written or Oral? Lessons to be Learned from Some Other Jurisdictions

   | Jul 14, 2016

Cite

ALI/UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedures. (2004). Retrieved from http://www.unidroit.org/english/principles/civilprocedure/ali-unidroitprinciples-e.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Andrews, N. (2005). The New English Civil Procedure Rules (1998). In C.H. van Rhee (Ed.), European Traditions in Civil Procedure, Antwerpen-Oxford: Intersentia, 161-181.Search in Google Scholar

Andrews, N. (2008). The Modern Civil Process: Judicial and Alternative Forms of Dispute Resolution in England. Tübingen: Mohr SiebeckSearch in Google Scholar

Andrews, N. (2012). The Three Paths of Justice: Court Proceedings, Arbitration, and Mediation in England. Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London-New York: Springer Science + Business Media.10.1007/978-94-007-2294-1Search in Google Scholar

Andrews, N. (2013). Civil Procedure. In A. Burrows (Ed.), English Private Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1324-1373.Search in Google Scholar

Arkuszewska, A.M. & Kościołek, A. (2012). Nowelizacja Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego - wybrane zagadnienia. Cz. 1. Przegląd Sądowy 5, 5-14.Search in Google Scholar

Backer, I.L. (2007). The Norwegian reform of civil procedure. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 41-75.Search in Google Scholar

Cadiet, L. & Amrani-Mekki, S. (2008). Civil Procedure. In G.A. Bermann, E. Picard (Eds.), Introduction to French Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 307-332.Search in Google Scholar

Chase, O.G. & Varano, V. (2012). Comparative civil justice. In M. Bussani & U. Mattei (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 210-240.10.1017/CBO9781139017206.013Search in Google Scholar

Civil Procedure Rules 1998. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/3132/contents/madeSearch in Google Scholar

Clampitt, P.G., DeKoch, R.J. & Cashman, T. (2000). A strategy for communicating about uncertainty. Academy of Management Executive 14(4), 41-57.Search in Google Scholar

Council Recommendations - “Promoting the use of and sharing of best practices on cross-border videoconferencing in the area of justice in the Member States and at EU level” (OJ C 250, 31.7.2015).Search in Google Scholar

Czerwiński, A. (2015). Mediacja z punktu widzenia sędziego. Retrieved from http://caim.gov.pl/images/user_media/40/O%20mediacji/Nowe/Mediacja%20z%20punktu%20widzenia%20s%C4%99dziego.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Draft Strategy on European e-justice 2014-2018 (OJ C 376, 21.12.2013).Search in Google Scholar

Ekelöf, P.O. (1995). Scandinavian Countries. In M. Cappelletti (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Volume XVI. Civil Procedure. Ordinary Proceedings in First Instance. Tübingen & The Hague-Boston- London: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) & Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 189-210.Search in Google Scholar

Elliott C., Vernon C. & Jeanpierre E. (2006). French Legal System. Harlow: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

Ervo, L. (2009). Characteristics of procedure. In L. Ervo (Ed.), Civil Justice in Finland. Nagoya University Comparative Study of Civil Justice Vol. 2. Tokyo: Jigakusha Publishing Corporation, 55-100.Search in Google Scholar

Ervo, L. (2014). East-Scandinavian court culture from the religious point of view - secularized or quasi secularized civil litigation? In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Court Culture - Contemporary Problems. Białystok Volumes on Law & Culture Vol. 1. Bialystok: Temida 2, 53-70.Search in Google Scholar

Ervo, L. & Dahlqvist, A. (2014). Delays in civil proceedings: Comparative Studies Between Finland and Sweden, In L. Ervo, A. Nylund (Eds.), The Future of Civil Litigation: Access to Courts and Court-annexed Mediation in the Nordic Countries. Cham: Springer, 249-280.10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1_13Search in Google Scholar

Gonera, K. (2005). Przewlekłość postępowania w sprawach cywilnych. Przegląd Sądowy 11/12, 3-38.Search in Google Scholar

Górowski, J. (2014). Art. 207. In A. Marciniak, K. Piasecki (Eds.), Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom I. Komentarz. Art. 1-366. Warszawa: C.H. Beck, 881-888.Search in Google Scholar

Jacob, J.I.H. (1987). The Fabric of English Civil Justice. London: Stevens & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Jolowicz, J.A. (2000). On Civil Procedure. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511549540Search in Google Scholar

Karolczyk, B. (2013), Pretrial as a Part of Judicial Case Management in Poland in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Law Review, 15, 151-188.10.12775/CLR.2013.009Search in Google Scholar

Kay, M. (2012). (Ed.) Blackstone’s Civil Practice 2013: The Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kiurunen, P. & Lindstr¨om, N. (2012). Norway. In P.G. Karlsgodt (Ed.), World Class Actions: A Guide to Group and Representative Actions around the Globe. New York: Oxford University Press, 229-240.Search in Google Scholar

Kiurunen, P., Lindström, N. & Bylov Rath M. (2012). Denmark. In P.G. Karlsgodt (Ed.), World Class Actions: A Guide to Group and Representative Actions around the Globe. New York: Oxford University Press, 186-197.Search in Google Scholar

Kornai, J. (1995). Highway and Byways: Studies on Reform and Post-communist Transition. Cambridge-London: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kryzys wymiaru sprawiedliwości!!!. (2014, October 23). Retrieved from http://temidacontrasm.info/kyzys-wymiaru-sprawiedliwosci/Search in Google Scholar

Kunicki, I. (2008). Opinia na temat poselskiego projektu ustawy o zmianie ustawy - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego oraz niektorych innych ustaw (druk nr 112). Retrieved from http://orka.sejm.gov.pl/rexdomk6.nsf/0/0ED8F57D4CE900CFC12574CE0037995C/$file/i2467-08.rtfSearch in Google Scholar

Łazarska, A. (2012). Sędziowskie kierownictwo postępowaniem. Przegląd Sądowy, 5, 50-75.Search in Google Scholar

Łętowska, E. (2010). Niedomagająca legitymizacja trzeciej władzy. Dodatek do Monitora Prawniczego, 3, 30-34.Search in Google Scholar

Mańko, R. (2014). European Small Claims Procedure Legal analysis of the Commission’s proposal to remedy weaknesses in the current system. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2014/542137/EPRS_IDA(2014)542137_REV1_EN.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Mańko, R. (2015). Reform of the European Small Claims Procedure: Legislation in progress. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/557014/EPRS_BRI(2015)557014_EN.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości (2015a). Sądy Okręgowe - Polska. MS-S1. Sprawozdanie w sprawach cywilnych. Retrieved from https://isws.ms.gov.pl/Data/Files/_public/isws/jednoroczne/2014/spr_zbior_2014/ms-s1o_2014.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości (2015b). Sądy Rejonowe - Polska. MS-S1. Sprawozdanie w sprawach cywilnych. Retrieved from https://isws.ms.gov.pl/Data/Files/_public/isws/jednoroczne/2014/spr_zbior_2014/ms-s1r_2014.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Modéer, K.Å. (2004). Delay and judicial culture in Sweden. In C.H. van Rhee (Ed.), The Law’s Delay: Essays on Undue Delay in Civil Litigation. Antwerpen- Groningen: Intersentia, 195-202.Search in Google Scholar

Murray, P.L. & Stürner, R. (2004). German Civil Justice. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Niemi, J. (2010). Civil Procedure in Finland. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Search in Google Scholar

Nylund, A. (2014). European Integration and Nordic Civil Procedure. In L. Ervo, A. Nylund (Eds.), The Future of Civil Litigation: Access to Courts and Court-annexed Mediation in the Nordic Countries. Cham: Springer, 31-51.10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1_3Search in Google Scholar

Oberhammer, P. & Domej, T. (2010). Delay in Austrian Civil Procedure and the Legislator’s Response. In C.H. van Rhee (Ed.), Within a Reasonable Time. The History of Due and Undue Delay in Civil Litigation. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 57-73.10.2307/j.ctv1q69scv.15Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, C.A. & Pondy, L.R. (1979). Organizational communication. In S. Kerr (Ed.), Organizational behaviour. Columbus: Grid, 119-150.Search in Google Scholar

Orton, F. (2008). Some Special Features of Swedish Civil Procedure. Acta Juridica Hungarica, 49(3), 311-317.10.1556/AJur.49.2008.3.6Search in Google Scholar

Petersen, C.S. (2014). A comparative Perspective on Recent Nordic Reforms of Civil Justice. In L. Ervo, A. Nylund (Eds.), The Future of Civil Litigation: Access to Courts and Court-annexed Mediation in the Nordic Countries. Cham: Springer, 9-30.10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1_2Search in Google Scholar

Piasecki, K. (1989). Przewlekłość sądowego postępowania w sprawach cywilnych - przyczyny i środki zaradcze. Nowe Prawo 4, 29-39.Search in Google Scholar

Regulation (EU) 2015/2421 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure and Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 creating a European order for payment procedure (OJ L 341, 24.12.2015).Search in Google Scholar

van Rhee, C.H. (2004). (Ed.) The Law’s Delay: Essays on Undue Delay in Civil Litigation. Antwerpen-Groningen: Intersentia.Search in Google Scholar

van Rhee, C.H. (2012). Harmonisation of Civil Procedure: An Historical and Comparative Perspective. In X.E. Kramer, C.H. van Rhee (Eds.), Civil Litigation in a Globalising World. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 39-64.10.1007/978-90-6704-817-0_3Search in Google Scholar

Robberstad, A. (2012). Sivilprosess. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Search in Google Scholar

Smolej, M. & Johnsen, J.T. (2007). Time management of justice systems: a Northern Europe study. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Storskrubb E. (2008). Civil Procedure and EU Law: A Policy Area Uncovered. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199533176.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Strus-Wołos, M. (2013). Możliwości składania wnioskow dowodowych przez pełnomocnikow poza pierwszym pismem. In J. Giezek, A. Malicki (Eds.), Adwokatura a modele procedur sądowych. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 189-196.Search in Google Scholar

Sunnqvist,M. (2012). Loser Pays - But Only a Reasonable Amount. InM. Reimann (Ed.), Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: A Comparative Study. Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London-New York: Springer, 267-274.10.1007/978-94-007-2263-7_24Search in Google Scholar

The 2015 EU Justice Scoreboard (2015). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/effective-justice/files/justice_scoreboard_2015_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

The truth about civil cases (2015, October 9). Retrieved from http://open.justice.gov.uk/courts/civil-cases/Search in Google Scholar

Tokarczyk, R. (2008). Komparatystyka prawnicza. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

Ustawa z 17 listopada 1964 r. - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego, tekst jedn. Dz.U. z 2014 r., poz. 101, z poźn. zm.Search in Google Scholar

Uzelac, A. (2010). Survival of the Third Legal Tradition? Supreme Court Law Review 49, 377-396.Search in Google Scholar

Uzelac, A. (2014a). Delays and Backlogs in Civil Procedure. A (South East) European Perspective. Revista De Processo 238, 39-64.Search in Google Scholar

Uzelac, A. (2014b). (Ed.) Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial Systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-319-03443-0Search in Google Scholar

Uzelac, A. (2014c). Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary World. In A. Uzelac (Ed.), Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial Systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 3-34.10.1007/978-3-319-03443-0Search in Google Scholar

Werlauff, E. (2010). Civil Procedure in Denmark. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Search in Google Scholar

Wojciechowski, B. (2010). Discourse Ethics as a Basis of the Application of Law. In J. Jemielniak, P. Mikłaszewicz (Eds.), Interpretation of Law in the Global World: From Particularism to a Universal Approach. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 53-70.10.1007/978-3-642-04886-9_3Search in Google Scholar

Zieliński, A. (2014). Art. 207. In A. Zieliński (Ed.), Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Warszawa: C.H. Beck, 434-436.Search in Google Scholar

Żyznowski, T. (2013). Art. 207. In H. Dolecki, T. Wiśniewski (Eds.), Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom I. Artykuły 1-366. Warszawa:Wolters Kluwer, 780-787.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2199-6059
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Philosophy, other