The Ouroboros Model Embraces Its Sensory-Motoric Foundations And Learns To Talk

Andone, C. (2014). Maneuvering with the burden of proof: confrontational strategies in dealing with political accountability. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36, 59–78.10.2478/slgr-2014-0004Search in Google Scholar

Arunachalam, S., & Waxman, S. R. (2014). Let’s see a boy and a balloon: Argument labels and syntactic frame in verb learning. Learning and Development, in press.Search in Google Scholar

Bałaj, B. (2013). Visual scanning of figurative and abstract painting. Research on naïve in the field of art. Paper presented at Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies, 1st International Avant Conference, Toruń, Poland.Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, J. R. (1976). Destruction and creation. U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. Retrieved from http://www.goalsys.com/books/documents/DESTRUCTION_AND_CREATION.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, E. V. (1973). What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 65–110). New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cotterill, R. (2001). Cooperation of the basal ganglia, cerebellum, sensory cerebrum and hippocampus: possible implications for cognition, consciousness, intelligence and creativity. Progress in Neurobiology, 64, 1–33.10.1016/S0301-0082(00)00058-7Search in Google Scholar

Citron, F. M., & Goldberg, A. E. (2014). Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, in press.10.1162/jocn_a_00654Search in Google Scholar

Ferstl, E. C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: an event-related fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 325–340.10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00007-6Search in Google Scholar

Genter, D. (1978). On relational meaning: The acquisition of verb meaning, Child Development, 49, 988–998.10.2307/1128738Search in Google Scholar

Gómez, D. M., Berent, I., Benavides-Varela, S., Bion, R. A. H., Catarossi, L., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2014). Language universals at birth. Proc. Nat Acad. Sc., 111, 5837–5841.10.1073/pnas.1318261111Search in Google Scholar

Guthrie, L. (2013). The hands that do the thinking: Interactivity in mental arithmetic. Paper presented at Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies, 1st International Avant Conference, Toruń, Poland.Search in Google Scholar

Hagoort, P. (2005). On Broca, brain and binding: a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 416–423.10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004Search in Google Scholar

Haidarian H. S, Dinalankara, W., Fults, S., Wilson, S., Perlis, D., Schmill, M., Oates, T., Josyula, D. S., & Anderson, M. L. (2010). The metacognitive loop: An architecture for building robust intelligent systems. AAAI Fall Symposium: Commonsense Knowledge, Vol. FS-10-02 of AAAI Technical Report. AAAI.Search in Google Scholar

Haken, H. (1977). Synergetics: an introduction; nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry and biology. Berlin: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, N. (1935–1950). Ontologie. 4 Bände. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335–346.10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6Search in Google Scholar

Jacquette, D. (2014). Collective referential intentionality in the semantics of dialogue. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36, 143–159.10.2478/slgr-2014-0007Search in Google Scholar

Keidel, J. L., Davis, P. M., Gonzalez-Diaz, V. Martin, C. D., & Thierry, G. (2013). How Shekespeare tempests the brain: Neuroimaging insights. Cortex, 49, 913–919.10.1016/j.cortex.2012.03.011Search in Google Scholar

Kibrik, A. A. (2012, June). Non-discrete effects in language, or the critique of pure reason 2. Paper presented at The Fifth International Conference in Cognitive Science, Kaliningrad.Search in Google Scholar

Kupferberg, G. R., & Caplan, D (2003). Language dysfunctioon in schizophrenia. In R. B. Schiffer, S. M. Rao, & B. S. Fogel (Eds.): Neuropsychiatry, 2nd ed. (pp. 444–466). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Search in Google Scholar

Ledoux, K., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007). Syntactic priming in comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychological Science, 18, 135–143.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01863.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lewis, A. G., Wang, L., & Bastiaansen, M. (2015). Fast oscillatory dynamics during language comprehension: Unification versus maintenance and prediction? Brain & Language, in press. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.00310.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Lind, A., Hall, L., Breidegard, B., Balkenius, C., & Johansson, P. (2014). Speaker’s acceptance of real-time speech exchange indicates that we use auditory feedback to specify the meaning of what we say. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1198–1205. doi: 10.1177/095679761452979710.1177/0956797614529797Search in Google Scholar

Lucero, C., Zaharchuk, H., & Casasanto, D. (2014). Beat gestures facilitate speech production. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 898–903). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar

Mackenzie, J. (2014). From speech acts to semantics. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36, 121–142.10.2478/slgr-2014-0006Search in Google Scholar

Moen, R., & Norman, C. (2009). Evolution of the PDCA cycle. Retrieved on 4 April 2014 from http://kaizensite.com/learninglean/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Evolution-of-PDCA.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Moore, J. W., & Fletcher, P. C. (2012). Sense of agency in health and disease: A review of cue integration approaches. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 59–68.10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.010Search in Google Scholar

Noton, D., & Stark, L. (1971). Eye movements and visual perception. Scientific American, 224, 35–43.Search in Google Scholar

O’Regan, J. K. (2013). Why things feel the way they do: The sensorimotor approach to understanding phenomenal consciousness. Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies, 1st International Avant-Conference, Torun, Poland.Search in Google Scholar

Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen eighty-four. London: Secker & Warburg.Search in Google Scholar

Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 1–64.10.1017/S0140525X12001495Search in Google Scholar

Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2013). Thinking with Hands, Eyes, Things and Others. Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies, 1st International Avant Conference, Toruń, Poland.Search in Google Scholar

Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35, 587–637.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01165.xSearch in Google Scholar

Schneider, S., Rapp, M. A., Haeußinger, F. B., Ernst, L. H., Hamm, F. Fallgatter, A. J., & Ehlis, A.-C. (2014). Beyond the N400: Complementary access to early neural correlates of novel metaphor comprehension using combined electrophysiological and haemodynamic measurements. Cortex, 53, 45–59.10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.008Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. H. (2014). The Structure and functions of language. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36, 27–40.10.2478/slgr-2014-0001Search in Google Scholar

Selz, O. (1913). Über die Gesetze des geordneten Denkverlaufs, erster Teil. Eine experimentelle Untersuchung. Stuttgart: Speemann.Search in Google Scholar

Selz, O. (1922). Über die Gesetze des geordneten Denkverlaufs, zweiter Teil. Zur Psychologie des produktiven Denkens und des Irrtums. Bonn: Cohen.Search in Google Scholar

Shewhart, W. A. (1939). Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control. Washington, DC, The Graduate School, the Department of Agriculture, pp. 155.Search in Google Scholar

Thomsen, K. (2010a). The Ouroboros Model in the light of venerable criteria. Neurocomputing, 74, 121–128.10.1016/j.neucom.2009.10.031Search in Google Scholar

Thomsen, K. (2010b). Concept formation in the Ouroboros Model. Third Conference on Artificial General Intelligence, AGI 2010, Lugano, Switzerland.10.2991/agi.2010.15Search in Google Scholar

Thomsen, K. (2011a). Consciousness for the Ouroboros Model. Journal for Machine Consciousness, 3, 163–175.10.1142/S1793843011000662Search in Google Scholar

Thomsen, K. (2011b). The Ouroboros Model, selected facets. In C. Hernández et al. (Eds.), From brains to systems (pp. 239–250). New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-0164-3_19Search in Google Scholar

Thomsen, K. (2013). The Ouroboros Model embraces its sensory-motoric foundations. Paper presented at Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies, 1st International Avant Conference, Toruń, Poland.Search in Google Scholar

Thomsen, K. (2014). The cerebellum according to the Ouroboros Model, the “interpolator hypothesis”. Journal of Communication and Computer, 11, 239–254.Search in Google Scholar

Tydgat, I., Diepedaele, K., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2012). How lingering representations of abandoned context words affect speech production. Acta Psychologica, 140, 218–239.10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.004Search in Google Scholar

Willems, R. M., & Hagoort, P. (2007). Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture and action: A review. Brain & Language, 101, 278–289.10.1016/j.bandl.2007.03.004Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen. Kritisch-genetische Edition (J. Schulte, Hrsg.). Frankfurt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar