Scaffolded Minds And The Evolution Of Content In Signaling Pathways

Alksnis, N., (forthcoming). A review and reply to Radicalizing Enactivism: How scaffolding fails to solve the hard problem of content. Retrieved from: http://www.academia.edu/2711798/Review_and_reply_to_Radical_Enactivism_by_Hutto_and_MyinSearch in Google Scholar

Barandiaran, X. E., & Egbert, M. D. (2013). Norm-establishing and norm-following in autonomous agency. Artificial Life, 1–33. doi:10.1162/ARTL_a_0009410.1162/ARTL_a_00094Search in Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (2009). The interactivist model. Synthese, 166(3), 547–591. doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9375-x10.1007/s11229-008-9375-xSearch in Google Scholar

Block, N. i Kitcher, P. (2010). Misunderstanding Darwin: Natural selection’s secular critics get it wrong. Boston Review (March-April).Search in Google Scholar

Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-M10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-MSearch in Google Scholar

Chemero, A. (2000). Anti-representationalism and the dynamical stance. Philosophy of Science, 67(4), 625–647. doi:10.1086/39285810.1086/392858Search in Google Scholar

Chemero, A. (2011). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, A., & Toribio, J. (1994). Doing without representing? Synthese, 101(3), 401–431.10.1007/BF01063896Search in Google Scholar

Cowley, S. J. (2011). Distributed language. In S. J. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 1–14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.34Search in Google Scholar

Cuffari, E. C., Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2014). From participatory sense-making to language: there and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. doi:10.1007/s11097-014-9404-910.1007/s11097-014-9404-9Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (2008). Against Darwinism. Mind Language, 23(1), 1–24. doi:10.1111/j.14 68-0017.2007.00324.xSearch in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (1967). Truth and meaning. Synthese, 17, 304–23.10.1007/BF00485035Search in Google Scholar

De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. doi:10.1007/s11097-007-9076-910.1007/s11097-007-9076-9Search in Google Scholar

Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gauker, C. (2011). Words and images: An essay on the origins of ideas. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599462.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, 377–388.10.2307/2182440Search in Google Scholar

Hockett, Ch. F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 89–97.10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, M. I. (2015). Content in languaging: why radical enactivism is incompatible with representational theories of language. Language Sciences, 48, 90–129. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.00410.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, D. (2008). Folk psychological narratives: the socio-cultural basis of understanding reasons. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press10.7551/mitpress/7525.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Korbak, T. (2015). Radykalny enaktywizm a konserwatywna kognitywistyka. Analiza i Egzystencja, 29, 123–133.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maturana, H. R. (1978). Biology of language: the epistemology of reality. In G. A. Miller & L. Elizabeth (Eds.), Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg (pp. 27–63). New York, NY: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Millikan, R. G. (1989). Biosemantics. Journal of Philosophy, 86(6), 281–297. doi: 10.2307/202712310.2307/2027123Search in Google Scholar

Milkowski, M. (2015). Satisfaction conditions in anticipatory mechanisms. Biology & Philosophy, (February). doi:10.1007/s10539-015-9481-310.1007/s10539-015-9481-3Search in Google Scholar

O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 939–973 [discussion 973–1031].10.1017/S0140525X01000115Search in Google Scholar

Pattee, H. (1969). How does a molecule become a message? Developmental Biology Supplement, 3, 1–16.10.1016/B978-0-12-395541-8.50006-9Search in Google Scholar

Pattee, H. (1985). Universal principles of measurement and language functions in evolving systems. In J. Casti & A. Karlqvist (Eds.), Complexity of language and life: Mathematical approaches (pp. 268–281). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2012). Language as a system of replicable constraints. In H. H. Pattee & J. Raczaszek-Leonardi, Laws, Language and Life: Howard Pattee’s classic papers on the physics of symbols (pp. 295–333). Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Skyrms, B. (2011). Signals: Evolution, learning, and information. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Solomon, E. P., Martin, D. W., Martin, C., & Berg, L. R. (2014). Biology (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 1–34 [discussion 34–86]. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0100391010.1017/S0140525X01003910Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, E., & Stapleton, M. (2009). Making sense of sense-making: Reflections on enactive and extended mind theories. Topoi, 28(1), 23–30. doi:10.1007/s11245-008-9043-210.1007/s11245-008-9043-2Search in Google Scholar

Weber, A., & Varela, F. J. (2002). Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 97–125.10.1023/A:1020368120174Search in Google Scholar

Williams, M. (2010). Blind obedience: The structure and content of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar