The Hard Problem Of Content: Solved (Long Ago)

Bartels, A. (2006). Defending the structural concept of representation. Theoria, 21(1), 7–19.Search in Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (1993). Representational content in humans and machines. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 5(4), 285–333. doi:10.1080/0952813930895377510.1080/09528139308953775Search in Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (2008). The interactivist model. Synthese, 166(3), 547–591. doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9375-x10.1007/s11229-008-9375-xSearch in Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H., & Richie, D. M. (1983). On the nature of representation: a case study of James Gibson’s theory of perception. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Bielecka, K. (2014). Błędne reprezentacje a pojęcie funkcji w teleosemantyce. Analiza koncepcji Dretskego i Millikan. Filozofia Nauki, 1(85), 105–120.Search in Google Scholar

Brentano, F. (1900). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Hamburg: F. Meiner.Search in Google Scholar

Burge, T. (2010). Origins of objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581405.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, R. J. (2011). The concept of truth. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230307803Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, L. (1900). Alice’s adventures in wonderland. New York: Street & Smith.Search in Google Scholar

Chrudzimski, A. (1999). Die Theorie der Intentionalität bei Franz Brentano. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 57, 45–66. doi:10.5840/gps199957410.5840/gps1999574Search in Google Scholar

Clark, A., & Toribio, J. (1994). Doing without representing? Synthese, 101(3), 401–431. doi:10.1007/BF0106389610.1007/BF01063896Search in Google Scholar

Craik, K. (1967). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cummins, R., & Roth, M. (2012). Meaning and content in cognitive science. In R. Schantz (Ed.), Prospects for meaning (pp. 365–382). Berlin: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (1984). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Decock, L., & Douven, I. (2010). Similarity after Goodman. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2(1), 61–75. doi:10.1007/s13164-010-0035-y10.1007/s13164-010-0035-ySearch in Google Scholar

Dretske, F. I. (1986). Misrepresentation. In R. Bogdan (Ed.), Belief: form, content, and function (pp. 17–37). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dretske, F. I. (1988). Explaining behaviour: Reasons in a world of causes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Field, H. (1972). Tarski’s theory of truth. The Journal of Philosophy, 69(13), 347–375.10.2307/2024879Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1992). A theory of content and other essays. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6765.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2015). Minds without meanings: An essay on the content of concepts.10.7551/mitpress/9780262027908.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Goodman, N. (1951). The structure of appearance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, M. I. (2015). Content in languaging: why radical enactivism is incompatible with representational theories of language. Language Sciences, 48, 90–129. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.00410.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Hempel, C., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 135–175.10.1086/286983Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kirchhoff, M. D. (2011). Anti-representationalism: Not a well-founded theory of cognition. Res Cogitans, 2, 1–34.Search in Google Scholar

MacKay, D. M. (1969). Information, mechanism and meaning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3769.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mendelovici, A. (2012). Reliable misrepresentation and tracking theories of mental representation. Philosophical Studies, 165(2), 421–443. doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9966-810.1007/s11098-012-9966-8Search in Google Scholar

Millikan, R. G. (1986). Thoughts without laws; cognitive science with content. The Philosophical Review, 95(1), 47–80.10.2307/2185132Search in Google Scholar

Millikan, R. G. (2007). An input condition for teleosemantics? Reply to Shea (and Godfrey-Smith). Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 75(2), 436–455. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00083.x10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00083.xSearch in Google Scholar

Miłkowski, M. (2015a). Function and causal relevance of content. New Ideas in Psychology, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.00310.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.003Search in Google Scholar

Miłkowski, M. (2015b). Satisfaction conditions in anticipatory mechanisms. Biology & Philosophy, (February). doi:10.1007/s10539-015-9481-310.1007/s10539-015-9481-3Search in Google Scholar

Newman, M. H. A. (1928). Mr. Russell’s “Causal Theory of Perception”. Mind, 37(146), 137–148.Search in Google Scholar

Pattee, H. H. (1972). Physical problems of decision-making constraints. International Journal of Neuroscience, 3(3), 99–105. doi:10.3109/0020745720914762910.3109/00207457209147629Search in Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ramsey, W. M. (2007). Representation reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO978051159795410.1017/CBO9780511597954Search in Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804397Search in Google Scholar

Sloman, A. (2010). What’s information, for an organism or intelligent machine? How can a machine or organism mean? In G. Dodig-Crnkovic & M. Burgin (Eds.), Information and computation. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Stanley, J. (2011). Know how. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695362.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Swoyer, C. (1991). Structural representation and surrogative reasoning. Synthese, 87, 449–508.10.1007/BF00499820Search in Google Scholar

Tarski, A. (1933). Pojecie prawdy w jezykach nauk dedukcyjnych. Prace Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego, Wydzial III Nauk Matematyczno-Fizycznych, (34).Search in Google Scholar

Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychologial Review, 84(4), 327–352.10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, M. (2013). Simulation and similarity: using models to understand the world. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199933662.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

White, M., & Tarski, A. (1987). A philosophical letter of Alfred Tarski. The Journal of Philosophy, 84(1), 28–32.10.2307/2027134Search in Google Scholar

Woodward, J. (2001). Law and explanation in biology: Invariance is the kind of stability that matters. Philosophy of Science, 68(1), 1–20.10.1086/392863Search in Google Scholar