[Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Allsop, Judith, and Linda Mulcahy. 1998. Maintaining Professional Identity: Doctors’ Responses to Complaints. Sociology of Health & Illness 20(6): 802-824.10.1111/1467-9566.00130]Search in Google Scholar
[Annandale, Ellen. 1989. The Malpractice Crisis and the Doctor-Patient Relationship. Sociology of Health & Illness 11(1): 1-23.10.1111/1467-9566.ep10843996]Search in Google Scholar
[Annandale, Ellen. 1996. Working in the Front-Line: Risk Culture and Nursing in the New NHS. Sociological Review 44(3): 416-451.10.1111/j.1467-954X.1996.tb00431.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Barbot, Janine. 2008. Soigner en situation de risque judiciaire. Refus de transfusion et responsabilité médicale. Revue française de science politique 58(6): 985-1014.10.3917/rfsp.586.0985]Search in Google Scholar
[Barbot, Janine, and Emmanuelle Fillion. 2006. La « médecine défensive » : Critique d’un concept à succès. Sciences Sociales et Santé 24(2): 5-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergeron, Henri, and Patrick Castel. 2014. Sociologie politique de la santé. Paris: PUF.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biancucci, Matthieu. 2011. Les ajustements de la technique médicale face aux règles de droit. Sociologie du travail 53(3): 369-387.10.4000/sdt.9120]Search in Google Scholar
[Bucher, Rue, and Anselm Strauss. 1961. Professions in Process. American Journal of Sociology 66(4): 352-334.10.1086/222898]Search in Google Scholar
[Büchler, Andrea, and Thomas Gächter. 2011. Medical Law in Switzerland. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bury, Michael. 2010. The British Health Care System. Pp. 412-433 in The New Blackwell Companion to Medical Sociology, edited by William C. Cockerham. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444314786.ch19]Search in Google Scholar
[Cambrosio, Alberto, Peter Keating, Thomas Schlich, and George Weisz. 2006. Regulatory Objectivity and the Generation and Management of Evidence in Medicine. Social Science & Medicine 63(1): 189-199.10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.12.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Cartwright, Elizabeth, and Jan Thomas. 2001. Constructing Risk. Maternity Care, Law, and Malpractice. Pp. 218-228 in Birth by Design, edited by Raymond Devries, Cecilia Benoit, Edwin R. Van Teijlingen, and Sirpa Wrede. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cavalli, Samuele. 2014. Gérer le risque et l’incertitude: Une typologie des stratégies professionnelles dans la pratique du dépistage prénatal. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cook, W. Rupert, and Charlotte Neff. 1994. Attitudes of Physicians in Northern Ontario to Medical Malpractice Litigation. Canadian Family Physician 40: 689-698.]Search in Google Scholar
[Courvoisier, Delphine S., Thomas Agoritsas, Thomas V. Perneger, Ralph E. Schmidt, and Stéphane Cullati. 2011. Regrets Associated with Providing Healthcare: Qualitative Study of Experiences of Hospital-Based Physicians and Nurses. PLoS ONE 6(8), http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023138 (13.10.2015).10.1371/journal.pone.0023138]Search in Google Scholar
[Dalton, George D., Xanthia F. Samaropoulos, and Augustine C. Dalton. 2008. Effect of Physician Strategies for Coping with the US Medical Malpractise Crisis on Healthcare Delivery and Patient Access to Healthcare. Public Health 122(10): 1051-1060.10.1016/j.puhe.2008.01.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Dingwall, Robert, and Pru Hobson-West. 2006. Litigation and the Threat to Medicine. Pp. 40-61 in Challenging Medicine, 2nd edition, edited by David Kelleher, Jonathan Gabe, and Gareth Williams. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dubar, Claude, Pierre Tripier, and Valérie Boussard. 2011. Sociologie des professions. 3rd edition. Paris: Armand Colin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Exworthy, Mark, Emma K. Wilkinson, Alastair McColl, Michael Moore, Paul Roderick, Helen Smith, and John Gabbay. 2003. The Role of Performance Indicators in Changing the Autonomy of the General Practice Profession in the UK. Social Science & Medicine 56(7): 1493-1504.10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00151-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Fillion, Emmanuelle. 2009. A l’épreuve du sang contaminé. Paris: Editions EHESS.]Search in Google Scholar
[Flick, Uwe. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 4th edition. London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freidson, Eliot. 1970. The Profession of Medicine. New York: Mead and Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freidson, Eliot. 1985. The Reorganisation of the Medical Profession. Medical Care Review 42(1): 11-35.10.1177/107755878504200103]Search in Google Scholar
[Freidson, Eliot. 1994. Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy and Policy. Oxford: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hafferty, Frederic, and Donald W. Light. 1995. Professional Dynamics and the Changing Nature of Medical Work. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 36: 132-153.10.2307/2626961]Search in Google Scholar
[Hammer, Raphaël, and Claudine Burton-Jeangros. 2013. Tensions around Risks in Pregnancy: A Typology of Women’s Experiences of Surveillance Medicine. Social Science & Medicine 93: 55-63.10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.033]Search in Google Scholar
[Harrison, Stephen, and Waqar I.U. Ahmad. 2000. Medical Autonomy and the UK State 1975 to 2025. Sociology 34(1): 129-146.10.1177/S0038038500000092]Search in Google Scholar
[Harrison, Stephen, and George Dowswell. 2002. Autonomy and Bureaucratic Accountability in Primary Care: What English General Practitioners Say. Sociology of Health & Illness 24(2): 208-226.10.1111/1467-9566.00291]Search in Google Scholar
[Hassenteufel, Patrick. 1997. Les médecins face à l’Etat. Une comparaison européenne. Paris: Presses de Science Po.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haug, Marie, and Bebe Lavin. 1983. Consumerism in Medicine: Challenging Physician Authority. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hupert, Nathaniel, Ann G. Lawthers, Troyen A. Brennan, and Lynn M. Peterson. 1996. Processing the Tort Deterrent Signal: A Qualitative Study. Social Science & Medicine 43(1): 1-11.10.1016/0277-9536(95)00314-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacques, Béatrice. 2007. Sociologie de l’accouchement. Paris: PUF.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jain, Ashok, and Jane Ogden. 1999. General Practitioners’ Experiences of Patients’ Complaints: Qualitative Study. British Medical Journal 318(7198): 1596-1599.10.1136/bmj.318.7198.1596]Search in Google Scholar
[Jena, Anupam B., Seth Seabury, Darius Lakdawalla, and Amitabh Chandra. 2011. Malpractice Risk According to Physician Specialty. The New England Journal of Medicine 365: 629-636.10.1056/NEJMsa1012370]Search in Google Scholar
[Laude, Anne. 2010. La judiciarisation en France, sur la trace des États-Unis ? Les Tribunes de la Santé 26: 49-59.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liang, Bryan A. 2003. Layperson and Physician Perceptions of the Malpractice System: Implications for Patient Safety. Social Science & Medicine 57(1): 147-153.10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00337-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Light, Donald W. 2010. Health-Care Professions, Markets and Countervailing Powers. Pp. 270-289 in Handbook of Medical Sociology, 6th edition, edited by Chloe E. Bird, Peter Conrad, Allen M. Fremont, and Stefan Timmermans. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.10.2307/j.ctv16h2n9s.19]Search in Google Scholar
[Lupton, Deborah. 1997. Doctors on the Medical Profession. Sociology of Health & Illness 19(4): 480-497.10.1111/j.1467-9566.1997.tb00414.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Manaï, Dominique. 2010. Le suivi de la grossesse: De l’encadrement légal des analyses prénatales à la responsabilité médicale pour information incomplète. Pp. 71-99 in Risques et information dans le suivi de la grossesse : Droit, éthique et pratiques sociales, edited by Dominique Manaï, Claudine Burton-Jeangros, and Bernice Elger. Bern: Stämpfli.]Search in Google Scholar
[Manaï, Dominique, Claudine Burton-Jeangros, and Bernice Elger (Eds.). 2010. Risques et information dans le suivi de la grossesse : Droit, éthique et pratiques sociales. Bern: Stämpfli.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marjoribanks, Timothy, Mary-Jo Delvecchio Good, Ann G. Lawthers, and Lynn M. Peterson. 1996. Physicians’ Discourses on Malpractice and the Meaning of Medical Practice. Journal of Health & Social Behavior 37(2): 163-178.10.2307/2137271]Search in Google Scholar
[McKinlay, John B., and John D. Stoeckle. 1988. Corporatization and the Social Transformation of Doctoring. International Journal of Health Services 18(2): 191-205.10.2190/YEVW-6C44-YCYE-CGEU]Search in Google Scholar
[Mello, Michelle M., David M. Studdert, Catherine DesRoches, Jordan Peugh, Kinga Zapert, Troyen A. Brennan, and William M. Sage. 2004. Caring for Patients in a Malpractice Crisis: Physician Satisfaction and Quality of Care. Health Affairs 23(4): 42-53.10.1377/hlthaff.23.4.42]Search in Google Scholar
[Moyse, Danielle, and Nicole Diederich. 2006. Vers un droit à l’enfant normal ? L’arrêt Perruche et l’impact de la judiciarisation sur le dépistage prénatal. Toulouse: Editions Erès.10.3917/eres.diede.2006.01]Search in Google Scholar
[Nettleton, Sarah. 1995. The Sociology of Health and Illness. Cambridge: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Numerato, Dino, Domenico Salvatore, and Giovanni Fattore. 2012. The Impact of Management on Medical Professionalism: A Review. Sociology of Health & Illness 34(4): 626-644.10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01393.x]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD/WHO. 2011. OECD Reviews of Health Systems: Switzerland 2011. OECD Publishing, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/oecd-reviews-of-health-systems-switzerland-2011_9789264120914-en (07.01.2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Perneger, Thomas V., Marie Deom, Stéphane Cullati, and Patrick A. Bovier. 2012. Growing Discontent of Swiss Doctors, 1998-2007. European Journal of Public Health 22(4): 478-483.10.1093/eurpub/ckr114]Search in Google Scholar
[Rothhardt, Valérie. 2015. Bureau d’expertises extrajudiciaires de la FMH - Rapport annuel 2014. Bulletin des médecins suisses 96(18): 636-640.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steurer, Johan, Ulrike Held, Mathias Schmidt, Gerd Gigerenzer, Brigitte Tag, and Lucas M. Bachmann. 2009. Legal Concerns Trigger Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15(2): 390-392.10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01024.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Studdert, David M., Michelle M. Mello, William M. Sage, Catherine DesRoches, Jordan Peugh, Kinga Zapert, and Troyen A. Brennan. 2005. Defensive Medicine among High-Risk Specialist Physicians in a Volatile Malpractice Environment. Journal of the American Medical Association 293(21): 2609-2617.10.1001/jama.293.21.2609]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas, J. William, Erika C. Ziller, and Deborah A. Thayer. 2010. Low Costs of Defensive Medicine, Small Savings from Tort Reform. Health Affairs 29(9): 1578-1584.10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0146]Search in Google Scholar
[Timmermans, Stefan, and Emily S. Kolker. 2004. Evidence-Based Medicine and the Reconfiguration of Medical Knowledge. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 45(2): 177-193.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tousijn, Willem. 2006. Beyond Decline: Consumerism, Managerialism and the Need for A New Medical Professionalism. Health Sociology Review 15(5): 469-480.10.5172/hesr.2006.15.5.469]Search in Google Scholar
[Tussing, A. Dale, and Martha A. Wojtowycz. 1997. Malpractice, Defensive Medicine, and Obstetric Behaviour. Medical Care 35(2): 172-191.10.1097/00005650-199702000-00007]Search in Google Scholar
[Vanderminden, Jennifer, and Sharyn J. Potter. 2010. Challenges to the Doctor-Patient Relationship in the Twenty-First Century. Pp. 355-372 in The New Blackwell Companion to Medical Sociology, edited by William C. Cockerham. Malden Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444314786.ch16]Search in Google Scholar
[Vincent, Charles, Magi Young, and Angela Phillips. 1994. Why Do People Sue Doctors? A Study of Patients and Relatives Taking Legal Action. Lancet 343: 1609-1613.10.1016/S0140-6736(94)93062-7]Search in Google Scholar