Implementing quality indicators for diabetes and hypertension in family medicine in Slovenia

1Mainz J. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 2003; 15: 523-30.1466053510.1093/intqhc/mzg081MainzJ.Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvementInt J Qual Health Care2003155233014660535Search in Google Scholar

2Kringos D, Boerma W, Bourgueil Y, Cartier T, Dedeu T, Hasvold T et al. The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study. Br J Gen Pract 2013; 63: e742-e50.KringosDBoermaWBourgueilYCartierTDedeuTHasvoldTHasvoldhe strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative studyBr J Gen Pract201363e742e5010.3399/bjgp13X674422380942724267857Search in Google Scholar

3Reid RO, Friedberg MW, Adams JL, McGlynn EA, Mehrotra A. Associations between physician characteristics and quality of care. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170: 1442-9.20837830ReidROFriedbergMWAdamsJLMcGlynnEAMehrotraA.Associations between physician characteristics and quality of careArch Intern Med20101701442910.1001/archinternmed.2010.307301778820837830Search in Google Scholar

4Rushforth B, Stokes T, Andrews E, Willis TA, McEachan R, Faulkner S et al. Developing ‘high impact’ guideline-based quality indicators for UK primary care: a multi-stage consensus process. BMC Fam Pract 2015; 16: 156.10.1186/s12875-015-0350-626507739RushforthBStokesTAndrewsEWillisTAMcEachanRFaulknerSFaulknereveloping ‘high impact’ guideline-based quality indicators for UK primary care: a multi-stage consensus processBMC Fam Pract201516156462460026507739Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5Seddon ME, Marshall MN, Campbell SM, Roland MO. Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Qual Health Care 2001; 10: 152-8.10.1136/qhc.0100152SeddonMEMarshallMNCampbellSMRolandMO.Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New ZealandQual Health Care2001101528Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6Simou E, Pliatsika P, Koutsogeorgou E, Roumeliotou A. Quality indicators for primary health care: a systematic literature review. J Public Health Manag Pract 2015; 21: E8-16.10.1097/PHH.000000000000003724374361SimouEPliatsikaPKoutsogeorgouERoumeliotouA.Quality indicators for primary health care: a systematic literature reviewJ Public Health Manag Pract201521E81624374361Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7Campbell S, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Middleton E, Sibbald B, Roland M. Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 181-90.10.1056/NEJMsr06599017625132CampbellSReevesDKontopantelisEMiddletonESibbaldBRolandM.Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performanceN Engl J Med20073571819017625132Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8Buetow S. Pay-for-performance in New Zealand primary health care. J Health Organ Manag 2008; 22: 36-47.10.1108/1477726081086239918488518BuetowS.Pay-for-performance in New Zealand primary health careJ Health Organ Manag200822364718488518Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9Van Herck P, De Smedt D, Annemans L, Remmen R, Rosenthal MB, Sermeus W. Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10: 247.10.1186/1472-6963-10-24720731816Van HerckPDe SmedtDAnnemansLRemmenRRosenthalMBSermeusW.Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health careBMC Health Serv Res201010247293637820731816Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10Boerma W, Kringos D, Verschuuren M, Pellny M, Bulc M. Primary care quality management in Slovenia. Copenhagen: WHO, 2008.BoermaWKringosDVerschuurenMPellnyMBulcM.Primary care quality management in SloveniaCopenhagenWHO2008Search in Google Scholar

11Petek D, Campbell S, Serec M, Kersnik J. Quality indicators of cardiovascular disease prevention for primary care in Slovenia. Zdrav Vestn 2012; 81: 687-98.PetekDCampbellSSerecMKersnikJ.Quality indicators of cardiovascular disease prevention for primary care in SloveniaZdrav Vestn20128168798Search in Google Scholar

12Petek D, Kersnik J. Management of cardiovascular risk factors in high risk patients: correlates of quality of care. Zdr Varst 2013; 52: 263-74.PetekDKersnikJ.Management of cardiovascular risk factors in high risk patients: correlates of quality of careZdr Varst2013522637410.2478/sjph-2013-0027Search in Google Scholar

13Pavlic DR, Sever M, Klemenc-Ketis Z, Svab I. Process quality indicators in family medicine: results of an international comparison. BMC Fam Pract 2015; 16: 172.10.1186/s12875-015-0386-726631138PavlicDRSeverMKlemenc-KetisZSvabI.Process quality indicators in family medicine: results of an international comparisonBMC Fam Pract201516172466750026631138Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14Schafer WL, Boerma WG, Kringos DS, De Maeseneer J, Gress S, Heinemann S et al. QUALICOPC, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care. BMC Fam Pract 2011; 12: 115.10.1186/1471-2296-12-11522014310SchaferWLBoermaWGKringosDSDe MaeseneerJGressSHeinemannSHeinemann, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary careBMC Fam Pract201112115320682222014310Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, McGlynn EA, Campbell S, Brook RH, Roland MO. Can health care quality indicators be transferred between countries? Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 8-12.1257133810.1136/qhc.12.1.8MarshallMNShekellePGMcGlynnEACampbellSBrookRHRolandMO.Can health care quality indicators be transferred between countries?Qual Saf Health Care200312812174366812571338Search in Google Scholar

16Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall MN. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. BMJ 2003; 326: 816-9.10.1136/bmj.326.7393.81612689983CampbellSMBraspenningJHutchinsonAMarshallMN.Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary careBMJ20033268169112572112689983Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17Campbell SM, Hann M, Hacker J, Burns C, Oliver D, Thapar A et al. Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study. BMJ 2001; 323: 784-7.1158808210.1136/bmj.323.7316.784CampbellSMHannMHackerJBurnsCOliverDThaparAThapardentifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational studyBMJ200132378475735811588082Search in Google Scholar

18Poplas-Susic T, Svab I, Kersnik J. The project of model practices in family medicine in Slovenia. Zdrav Vestn 2013; 82: 635-47.Poplas-SusicTSvabIKersnikJ.The project of model practices in family medicine in SloveniaZdrav Vestn20138263547Search in Google Scholar

19Klemenc-Ketis Z, Kravos A, Poplas-Susič T, Svab I, Kersnik J. New tool for patient evaluation of nurse practitioner in primary care settings. J Clin Nurs 2014; 23: 1323-31.10.1111/jocn.1237724028310Klemenc-KetisZKravosAPoplas-SusičTSvabIKersnikJ.New tool for patient evaluation of nurse practitioner in primary care settingsJ Clin Nurs20142313233124028310Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20Anon. Poročilo o kazalnikih kakovosti. Ljubljana: MZ, 2015.AnonPoročilo o kazalnikih kakovostiLjubljanaMZ2015Search in Google Scholar

21Nerat T, Kos M. Burden of type 2 diabetes from the healthcare payer perspective in Slovenia. Zdr Varst 2013; 52: 162-80.NeratTKosM.Burden of type 2 diabetes from the healthcare payer perspective in SloveniaZdr Varst20135216280Search in Google Scholar

22Ettorchi-Tardy A, Levif M, Michel P. Benchmarking: a method for continuous quality improvement in health. Healthc Policy 2012; 7: e101-19.23634166Ettorchi-TardyALevifMMichelP.Benchmarking: a method for continuous quality improvement in healthHealthc Policy20127e1011910.12927/hcpol.2012.22872Search in Google Scholar

23Petek D, Mlakar M. Quality of care for patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in ‘model practices’ in Slovenia – first results. Zdr Varst 2016; 55: 179-84.27703537PetekDMlakarM.Quality of care for patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in ‘model practices’ in Slovenia – first resultsZdr Varst2016551798410.1515/sjph-2016-0023503106727703537Search in Google Scholar

24Heneghan C, Perera R, Mant D, Glasziou P. Hypertension guideline recommendations in general practice: awareness, agreement, adoption, and adherence. Br J Gen Pract 2007; 57: 948-52.1825206910.3399/096016407782604965HeneghanCPereraRMantDGlasziouP.Hypertension guideline recommendations in general practice: awareness, agreement, adoption, and adherenceBr J Gen Pract20075794852208413318252069Search in Google Scholar

25Midlov P, Ekesbo R, Johansson L, Gerward S, Persson K, Nerbrand C et al. Barriers to adherence to hypertension guidelines among GPs in southern Sweden: a survey. Scand J Prim Health Care 2008; 26: 154-9.1860925010.1080/02813430802202111MidlovPEkesboRJohanssonLGerwardSPerssonKNerbrandCNerbrandarriers to adherence to hypertension guidelines among GPs in southern Sweden: a surveyScand J Prim Health Care2008261549340960318609250Search in Google Scholar

26Rao DT, Sunio LK, Lo YJ, Gossain VV. Comparison of the adherence to the American Diabetes Association guidelines of diabetes care in primary care and subspecialty clinics. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2015; 14: 35.10.1186/s40200-015-0158-xRaoDTSunioLKLoYJGossainVV.Comparison of the adherence to the American Diabetes Association guidelines of diabetes care in primary care and subspecialty clinicsJ Diabetes Metab Disord20151435441525225932457Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27Seidu S, Khunti K. Non-adherence to diabetes guidelines in primary care – the enemy of evidence-based practice. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012; 95: 301-2.2229393010.1016/j.diabres.2012.01.015SeiduSKhuntiK.Non-adherence to diabetes guidelines in primary care – the enemy of evidence-based practiceDiabetes Res Clin Pract201295301222293930Search in Google Scholar

28Ohmann C, Kuchinke W, Canham S, Lauritsen J, Salas N, Schade-Brittinger C et al. Standard requirements for GCP-compliant data management in multinational clinical trials. Trials 2011; 12: 85.10.1186/1745-6215-12-85OhmannCKuchinkeWCanhamSLauritsenJSalasNSchade-BrittingerCBrittingertandard requirements for GCP-compliant data management in multinational clinical trialsTrials20111285307451621426576Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29Kumar AM, Naik B, Guddemane DK, Bhat P, Wilson N, Sreenivas AN et al. Efficient, quality-assured data capture in operational research through innovative use of open-access technology. Public Health Action 2013; 3: 60-2.10.5588/pha.13.0004KumarAMNaikBGuddemaneDKBhatPWilsonNSreenivasANSreenivasfficient, quality-assured data capture in operational research through innovative use of open-access technologyPublic Health Action20133602446307726392997Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30Jelić J, Drinovec J, Mrhar A. Burden of type 2 diabetes. Farm Vestn 2006; 57: 315-24.JelićJDrinovecJMrharA.Burden of type 2 diabetesFarm Vestn20065731524Search in Google Scholar

31Smith PC. Measuring health system performance. Eur J Health Econ 2002; 3: 145-8.10.1007/s10198-002-0138-115609138SmithPC.Measuring health system performanceEur J Health Econ20023145815609138Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32Groenewegen P, Heinemann S, Gress S, Schafer W. Primary care practice composition in 34 countries. Health Policy 2015; 119: 1576-83.10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.08.00526319096GroenewegenPHeinemannSGressSSchaferW.Primary care practice composition in 34 countriesHealth Policy201511915768326319096Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

33Engels Y, Campbell S, Dautzenberg M, van den Hombergh P, Brinkmann H, Szecsenyi J et al. Developing a framework of, and quality indicators for, general practice management in Europe. Fam Pract 2005; 22: 215-22.10.1093/fampra/cmi00215722398EngelsYCampbellSDautzenbergMvan den HomberghPBrinkmannHSzecsenyiJSzecsenyieveloping a framework of, and quality indicators for, general practice management in EuropeFam Pract2005222152215722398Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

34Deveugele M, Derese A, van den Brink-Muinen A, Bensing J, De Maeseneer J. Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries. BMJ 2002; 325: 472.1220232910.1136/bmj.325.7362.472DeveugeleMDereseAvan den Brink-MuinenABensingJDe MaeseneerJ.Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countriesBMJ200232547211944412202329Search in Google Scholar