Comparison of Cardiovascular Risk Screening Methods and Mortality Data Among Hungarian Primary care Population: Preliminary Results of the First Government-Financed Managed care Program / Primerjava Metod Presejanja Ogroženosti Srčno-Žilnega Sistema In Podatkov O Smrtnosti Madžarskega Prebivalstva Z Osnovno Zdravstveno Oskrbo: Predhodni Rezultati Prvega Programa Vodene Oskrbe, Ki Ga Je Financirala Vlada

1. Census 2011-Regional data-3.2 Bács-Kiskun County. Budapest: Központi Statisztikai Hivatal, 2013: 7-26.Search in Google Scholar

2. Marteau TM, Kinmonth AL. Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice? BMJ 2002; 325: 78.Search in Google Scholar

3. Cuspidi C, Meani S, Salerno M, Severgnini B, Fusi V, Valerio C. et al: Cardiovascular risk stratification according to the 2003 ESH-ESC guidelines in uncomplicated patients with essential hypertension: comparison with the 1999 WHO/ISH guidelines criteria. Blood Press 2004; 13: 144-51.10.1080/0803705041003316915223722Search in Google Scholar

4. Chamnan P, Simmons RK, Khaw K-T. Estimating the population impact of screening strategies for identifying and treating people at high risk of cardiovascular disease: modelling study. BMJ 2010; 340: c1693.10.1136/bmj.c1693285932120418545Search in Google Scholar

5. Law about budget act of Hungarian social insurance for 1999. Magyar Közlöny 1998; 120: 8244-64.Search in Google Scholar

6. International Classification of Diseases. Version 10. Available Jul 1, 2014 from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/.Search in Google Scholar

7. Fifth Hungarian Cardiovascular Consensus Conference. Metabolizmus 2012; 10(Suppl A): A1-81.Search in Google Scholar

8. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP): expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III): final report. Circulation 2002; 106: 3143-421.10.1161/circ.106.25.3143Search in Google Scholar

9. Statistical year book 2011. Budapest: National Health Insurance Fund Admistration, 2011: 22.Search in Google Scholar

10. Bényi M, Kéki Zs, Hangay I. Obesity related increase in diseases in Hungary studied by the Health Interview Survey 2009. Orv Hetil 2012; 153: 768-75.10.1556/OH.2012.2930222580503Search in Google Scholar

11. Ilyés I, Jancsó Z, Simay A. Trends and current questions of cardivascular prevention in primary health care. Orv Hetil 2012; 153: 1536-46.10.1556/OH.2012.2944223000420Search in Google Scholar

12. Kolozsvári LR, Langmár Z, Rurik I. Nationwide screening program for breast and cervical cancers in Hungary: special challenges, outcomes, and the role of the primary care provider. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2013; 34: 419-24.Search in Google Scholar

13. Kolozsvári LR, Orozco-Beltran D, Rurik I. Do family physicians need more payment for working better? financial incentives in primary care. Aten Primaria 2014; 46: 261-6.10.1016/j.aprim.2013.12.014698561824721041Search in Google Scholar

14. Móczár Cs, Borgulya G, Kovács E, Rurik I. Could primary care dietary intervention combined with lifestyle changes be effective in the cardiovascular prevention? Acta Alim 2012; 41: 248-56.Search in Google Scholar

15. Szigethy E, Jancsó Z, Móczár C, Ilyés I, Kovács E, Kolozsvári L. et al. Primary care of patients with high cardiovascular risk : blood pressure, lipid and diabetic target levels and their achievement in Hungary. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2013;125: 371-80.10.1007/s00508-013-0379-223824265Search in Google Scholar