Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study of the Root Canal Morphology of Mandibular Anterior Teeth in Serbian Population

1. Tabassum S, Khan FR. Failure of endodontic treatment: The usual suspects. Eur J Dent. 2016; 10(1):144-7.10.4103/1305-7456.175682478414527011754Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Yu X, Guo B, Li KZ, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a western Chinese population. BMC Med Imaging. 2012; 12:18.10.1186/1471-2342-12-18341216622817397Search in Google Scholar

3. de Toubes KM, Côrtes MI, Valadares MA, Fonseca LC, Nunes E, Silveira FF. Comparative analysis of accessory mesial canal identification in mandibular first molars by using four different diagnostic methods. J Endod. 2012; 38(4):436-41.10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.03522414825Search in Google Scholar

4. Beljić-Ivanović K, Teodorović N. Morphological characteristics of mesiobuccal root canals of the first maxillary molars. Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo 2010; 138(7-8):414-19.10.2298/SARH1008414B20842884Search in Google Scholar

5. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod. 2007; 33(9):1121-32.10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.01117931947Search in Google Scholar

6. Altunsoy M, Ok E, Nur BG, AglarciOS, Gungor E, Colak M. A cone-beam computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of anterior teeth in a Turkish population. European Journal of Dentistry. 2014; 8(3):302-6.10.4103/1305-7456.137630414412525202207Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Liu J, Luo J, Dou L, Yang D. CBCT study of root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular incisors in a Chinese population. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014; 72:26-30.10.3109/00016357.2013.77533724255962Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Aminsobhani M, Sadegh M, Meraji N, Razmi H, Kharazifard MJ. Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of mandibular permanent anterior teeth in an Iranian population by cone-beam computed tomography. J Dent (Tehran). 2013; 10:358-66.Search in Google Scholar

9. Somalinga Amardeep N, Raghu S, Natanasabapathy V. Root canal morphology of permanent maxillary and mandibular canines in Indian population using cone beam computed tomography. Anat Res Int. 2014; 2014:731859.10.1155/2014/731859403341324895538Search in Google Scholar

10. Da Silva EJ, de Castro RW, Nejaim Y, et al. Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth using cone beam computed tomography: An in-vivo study. Quintessence Int. 2016; 47(1):19-24.Search in Google Scholar

11. Lin Z, Hu Q, Wang T, et al. Use of CBCT to investigate the root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36(9):877-82.10.1007/s00276-014-1267-924515289Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Han T, Ma Y, Yang L, Chen X, Zhang X, Wang Y. A study of the root canal morphology of mandibular anterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomography in a Chinese subpopulation. J Endod. 2014; 40(9):1309-14.10.1016/j.joen.2014.05.00825043332Search in Google Scholar

13. Zhengyan Y, Keke L, Fei W, Yueheng L, Zhi Z. Conebeam computed tomography study of the root and canal morphology of mandibular permanent anterior teeth in a Chongqing population. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 2016; 12:19-25.Search in Google Scholar

14. Soleymani A, Namaryan N, Moudi E, Gholinia A. Root Canal Morphology of Mandibular Canine in an Iranian Population: A CBCT Assessment. Iran Endod J. 2017; 12(1):78-82.Search in Google Scholar

15. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984; 58(5):589-99.10.1016/0030-4220(84)90085-9Search in Google Scholar

16. Rahimi S, Milani AS, Shahi S, Sergiz Y, Nezafati S, Lotfi M. Prevalence of two root canals in human mandibular anterior teeth in an Iranian population. Indian J Dent Res. 2013; 24(2):234-6.10.4103/0970-9290.116694Search in Google Scholar

17. Al-Qudah AA, Awawdeh LA. Root canal morphology of mandibular incisors in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J. 2006; 39(11):873-7.10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01159.xSearch in Google Scholar

18. Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod. 2004; 30(6):391-8.10.1097/00004770-200406000-00004Search in Google Scholar

19. Bakianian Vaziri P, Kasraee S, Abdolsamadi HR, et al. Root Canal Configuration of one-rooted Mandibular Canine in an Iranian Population: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects. 2008; 2(1):28-32.Search in Google Scholar

20. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972; 33(1):101-10.10.1016/0030-4220(72)90214-9Search in Google Scholar

21. Leoni GB, Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Damião de Sousa-Neto M. Micro-computed tomographic analysis of the root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. J Endod. 2014; 40(5):710-6.10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.00324767569Search in Google Scholar

22. Omer OE, Al Shalabi RM, Jennings M, Glennon J, Claffey NM. A comparison between clearing and radiographic techniques in the study of the root-canal anatomy of maxillary first and second molars. Int Endod J. 2004; 37(5):291-6.10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00731.x15086749Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod. 2010; 36(9):1547-51.10.1016/j.joen.2010.05.00820728725Search in Google Scholar