Partner Notification for Gonorrhea and Syphilis in Belgrade

1. Newman L, Rowley J, Vander Hoorn S, Wijesooriya NS, Unemo M, Low N, et al. Global estimates of the prevalence and incidence of four curable sexually transmitted infections in 2012 based on systematic review and global reporting. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0143304.10.1371/journal.pone.0143304Search in Google Scholar

2. Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Report of Infectious diseases in Belgrade in 2016. Belgrade: City Institute of Public Health of Belgrade; 2017. p. 51.Search in Google Scholar

3. Workowski KA, Bolan GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015;64(RR-03):1-137.Search in Google Scholar

4. Trelle S, Shang A, Nartey L, Cassell JA, Low N. Improved effectiveness of partner notification for patient with sexually transmitted infections: systematic review. BMJ. 2007;334(7589):354.10.1136/bmj.39079.460741.7CSearch in Google Scholar

5. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Public health benefits of partner notifications for sexually transmitted infections and HIV. Stockholm: ECDC; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

6. Desir FA, Ladd JH, Gaydos CA. Survey of partner notification for sexually transmissible infections in the United States. Sex Health. 2016;13(3):162-9.10.1071/SH15136Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Low N, Broutet N, Adu-Sarkodie Y, Barton P, Hossein M, Hawkes S. Global control of sexually transmitted infections. Lancet. 2006;368(9551):2001-16.10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69482-8Search in Google Scholar

8. Adler MW. The terrible peril: a historical perspective o n t h e v e n e r e a l d i s e a s e s . B r M e d J . 1980;281(6234):206-11.Search in Google Scholar

9. Ruden AK, Jonsson A, Lidbrink P, Allebeck P, Bygdeman SM. Endemic versus non-endemic gonorrhoea in Stockholm: results of contact tracing. Int J STD AIDS. 1993;4(5):284-92.10.1177/0956462493004005078218516Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Brandt AM. No magic bullet-a social history of venereal disease in the United States since 1880. Expended edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987.Search in Google Scholar

11. Cowan FM, French R, Johnson AM. The role and effectiveness of partner notification in STD control: a review. Genitourin Med. 1996;72(4):247-52.10.1136/sti.72.4.24711956718976827Search in Google Scholar

12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). STD surveillance case definitions. [cited 2017 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/casedefinitions-2014.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hogben M. Partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44 Suppl 3:S160-74.10.1086/51142917342669Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Apoola A, Radcliffe K, Das S, Robshaw V, Gilleran G, Kumari BS, et al. Patient preferences for partner notification. Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82(4):327-9.10.1136/sti.2005.018119256472216877586Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Gorbach PM, Aral SO, Celum S, Stoner BP, Whittington WL, Galea J, et al. To notify or not to notify: STD patients’ perspectives of partner notification in Seattle. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27(4):193-200.10.1097/00007435-200004000-0000310782740Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Alam N, Chamot E, Vermund SH, Streatfield K, Kristensen S. Partner notification for sexually transmitted infections in developing countries: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:19.10.1186/1471-2458-10-19282136220082718Search in Google Scholar

17. Bjekić M, Šipetić S. An outbreak of early syphilis in patients registred at City Institute for Skin and Venereal Diseases in Belgrade from 2010 to 2012: a case series of 86 patients. Serbian Journal of Dermatology and Venerology. 2013;5(2):65-71.10.2478/sjdv-2013-0006Search in Google Scholar

18. Reynolds SL, Kapadia AS, Leonard L. Ross MW. Examining the direct cost and effectiveness of syphilis detection by selective screening and partner notification. J Pub Health Med. 2001;23(3):339-45.10.1093/pubmed/23.4.33911873899Search in Google Scholar

19. van Duynhoven YT, Schop WA, van der Meijden WI, van de Laar MJ. Patient referral outcome in gonorrhoea and chlamydial infections. Sex Transm In f. 1998;74(5):323-30.10.1136/sti.74.5.323175814510195026Search in Google Scholar

20. Low N, Welch K, Radcliffe K. Developing national outcome standards for the management of gonorrhoea and genital chlamydia in genitourinary medicine clinics. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80(3):223-9.10.1136/sti.2003.005165174484115170010Search in Google Scholar

21. Klann JG, Mendis M, Phillips LC, Goodson AB, Rocha BH, Goldberg HS, et al. Taking adventage of continuity of care documents to populate a research repository. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22(2):370-9. 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003040608072925352566Search in Google Scholar

22. Golden MR, Hughes JP, Brewer DD, Holmes KK, Whittington WL, Hogben M, et al. Evaluation of a population based program of expedited partner therapy for gonorrhoea and chlamydial infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34(8):598-603.10.1097/01.olq.0000258319.54316.0617413683Search in Google Scholar

23. Kerani RP, Fleming M, Golden MR. Acceptability and intention to seek medical care after hypothetical receipt of patient-delivered partner therapy or electronic partner notification postcard among men who have sex with men: the partner`s perspective. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40(2):179-85.10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31827adc0623324981Open DOISearch in Google Scholar