Artifacts and The Problem of Ethical Extensionism – Selected Issues

1. Attfield, R. Beyond Anthropocentrism, In A. O’Hear (ed.), Philosophy and the Environment, Cambridge 2011.10.1017/S1358246111000191Search in Google Scholar

2. Baker, L.R. The Ontology of Artifacts, Philosophical Explorations, 7(2), 2004.10.1080/13869790410001694462Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Baker, L.R. The Metaphysics of Everyday Life, Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

4. Bennett, J. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham – London: Duke University Press, 2010.10.1215/9780822391623Search in Google Scholar

5. Benso, S. The Face of Things: A Different Side of Ethics, New York: SUNY, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

6. Bińczyk, E. Posthumanist Tendencies in Science and Technology Studies, Political Dialogues. Journal of Biopolitics and Contemporary Politcal Theories, 15, 2013.10.12775/DP.2013.001Search in Google Scholar

7. Blok, V. Heidegger’s Ontology of Work, Heidegger Studies, 31, 2015.10.5840/heideggerstud2015315Search in Google Scholar

8. Braidotti, R. The Posthuman, Malden: Polity, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

9. Devall, B. Simple in Means, Rich in Ends. Practicing Deep Ecology, Salt Lake City, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

10. Goodpaster, K. On Being Morally Considerable, Journal of Philosophy, 75 (6), 1978,10.2307/2025709Search in Google Scholar

11. Goodpaster, K. On Stopping at Everything: A Reply to W. M. Hunt, Environmental Ethics, 3(3), 1980.10.5840/enviroethics1980235Search in Google Scholar

12. Gunkel, D. A Vindication of the Rights of Machines, Philosophy & Technology, 27 (1), 2012.10.1007/s13347-013-0121-zSearch in Google Scholar

13. Hale, B. Technology, the Environment and the Moral Considerability of Artefacts, In J.K.B. Olsen, E. Selinegr & S. Riis (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Technology, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.10.1057/9780230227279_11Search in Google Scholar

14. Houkes, W. & Vermaas P.E. Actions versus Functions: A Plea For an Alternative Metaphysics of Artifacts, Monist, 87, 2004.10.5840/monist20048712Search in Google Scholar

15. Houkes, W. & Vermaas P.E. Produced to Use: Combining Two Key Intuitions on the Nature of Artefacts, Techne, 13 (2), 2009.10.5840/techne200913211Search in Google Scholar

16. Houkes, W. & Vermaas P.E. Contemporary Engineering and the Metaphysics of Artefacts: Beyond the Artisan Model, The Monist, 92 (3), 2009.10.5840/monist200992323Search in Google Scholar

17. Hullinger, J. Ikea Wants You To Stop Throwing Away Your Ikea Furniture, [online:] http://www.fastcompany.com/3055971/most–creative–people/ikea–wants–you–to–stop–throwing–away–your–ikea–furniture, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

18. Hunt, W. M. Are Mere Things Morally Considerable? Environmental Ethics, 2(3), 1980.10.5840/enviroethics19802111Search in Google Scholar

19. Ihde, D. Expanding Hermeneutics, Evanston: Fordham UP, 1998.10.1007/978-94-015-9293-2_28Search in Google Scholar

20. Ihde, D. Postphenomenology, Evanston: Fordham UP, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

21. Introna, L. Ethics and Speaking of Things, Theory, Culture & Society, 3, 2009.10.1177/0263276409104967Search in Google Scholar

22. Katayama, E. Aristotle on Artifacts: a Metaphysical Puzzle, Albany: SUNY, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

23. Katz, E. Understanding Moral Limits in the Duality of Artifacts and Nature: A Reply to Critics, Ethics & the Environment, 1, 2002.10.1353/een.2002.0007Search in Google Scholar

24. Katz, E. Further Adventures in the Case Against Restoration, Environmental Ethics, 1, 2012.10.5840/enviroethics20123416Search in Google Scholar

25. Katz, E. Artefacts and Functions: A Note on the Value of Nature, Environmental Values, 2, 1993.10.3197/096327193776679909Search in Google Scholar

26. Kennedy, G. An Ontology of Trash. The Disposable and Its Problematic Nature, Albany: SUNY, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

27. Kiepas A. Człowiek wobec dylematów filozofii techniki, Katowice: Wyd. UŚ, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

28. Kim, J. Phenomenogy of Digital-Being, Human Studies, no. 24, 2001.10.1023/A:1010763028785Search in Google Scholar

29. King, R. 2002. Environmental Ethics and the Built Environment, Environmental Ethics, 22(2), 2002, pp. 115–131.Search in Google Scholar

30. Kotarbinski, T. Fazy rozwojowe konkretyzmu, Studia Filozoficzne, 1, 1958, pp. 228–236.Search in Google Scholar

31. Kotarbinski, T. Zasadnicze myśli pansomatyzmu, Przegląd Filozoficzny, 33, 1934, pp. 283–294.Search in Google Scholar

32. Kozłowski, J. O reizmie somatycznym Tadeusza Kotarbinskiego, Studia Humanistyczne Akademii Górniczo-Hutniczej. Prace Filozoficzne, 27, 1985, pp. 28–39.Search in Google Scholar

33. Lee, K. The Natural and the Artefactual. The Implications of Deep Science and Deep Technology for Environmental Phislosophy, Lanham – Boulder – New York – Oxford: Lexington Books, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

34. Lizut, R. A. Technika a wartości. Spór o aksjologiczą neutralność artefaktów, Lublin: Academicon, 2014.10.52097/acapress.9788362475766Search in Google Scholar

35. Maskit, J. Deep Ecology and Desire: On Naess and the Problem of Consumption, In E. Katz, A. Light, D. Rothenberg (eds.), Beneath the Surface. Critical Essays in the Philosophy of Deep Ecology, Cambridge – London: MIT Press, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

36. Morito, B. Intrinsic Value: A Modern Albatross for the Ecological Approach, Environmental Values, 12: 2003, pp. 317–336.10.3197/096327103129341342Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

37. Naess, A. The Deep Ecology Movement, G. Sessions (ed.), In Deep Ecology for the Twenty-First Century, Boston – London, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

38. Newman, L. & Dale, A. Celebrating the Mundane: Nature and the Built Environment, Environmental Values, 22: 2013, pp. 401–413.10.3197/096327113X13648087563827Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

39. Norton, B. Convergence, Noninstrumental Value and the Semantics of ‘Love’: Comment on McShane, Environmental Values, 17, 2008, pp. 5–14.10.3197/096327108X271914Search in Google Scholar

40. Ouderkirk, W. Katz’s Problematic Dualism and its “Seismic” Effects on His Theory, Ethics & the Environment, 7(1), 2002, pp. 124–137.10.2979/ETE.2002.7.1.124Search in Google Scholar

41. Piątek, Z. Aspekty antropocentryzmu, Kraków: Wyd. UJ, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

42. Piątek, Z. Etyka środowiskowa. Nowe spojrzenie na miejsce człowieka w przyrodzie, Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

43. Przybysz, A. Raport: czas użytkowania lodówek i telewizorów coraz krótszy. Wina producentów? Gazeta Wyborcza, 15.04.2015.Search in Google Scholar

44. Thompson, I. Landscape and Environmental Ethics, In P. Howard, I. Thompson, & E. Waterton (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies, London and New York: Routledge, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

45. Tymieniecka-Suchanek, J. (ed.). 2014 Człowiek w relacji do zwierząt, roślin i maszyn w kulturze. Od humanizmu do posthumanizmu, t. 1–2, Katowice: Wyd. UŚ, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

46. Verbeek, P.-P. What Things Do. Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design, University Park: Penn State UP, 2005.10.1515/9780271033228Search in Google Scholar

47. Vermaas P., Kroes P., & Franssen M. A Philosophy of Technology: From Technical Artefacts to Sociotechnical Systems, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2011.10.2200/S00321ED1V01Y201012ETS014Search in Google Scholar

48. Vogel, S. Environmental Philosophy after the End of Nature, Environmental Ethics, 24(1), 2002.10.5840/enviroethics200224139Search in Google Scholar

49. Vogel, S. The Nature of Artfiacts, Environmental Ethics, 25(2), 2003.10.5840/enviroethics200325230Search in Google Scholar

50. Vogel, S. Thinking like a Mall, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2015.10.7551/mitpress/9780262029100.001.0001Search in Google Scholar