Conditionals in Interaction

1. Brandom, R. Asserting, Noûs, 17 (4), 1983, pp. 637–650.10.2307/2215086Search in Google Scholar

2. Brandom, R. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.10.4159/9780674028739Search in Google Scholar

3. Brandom, R. Between Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199542871.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

4. Brandom, R. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

5. Díez, G. F. Kolmogorov, heyting and gentzen on the intuitionistic logical constants, Critica, 32 (96), 2000, pp. 43–57.10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2000.891Search in Google Scholar

6. Dubucs, J. Feasibility in logic, Synthese, 132(3), 2002, pp. 213–237.10.1023/A:1020332703930Search in Google Scholar

7. Dubucs, J. and, Marion, M. Radical anti-realism and substructural logics. In A. Rojszczak, J. Cachro, and G. Kurczewski (eds.), Philosophical Dimensions of Logic and Science, Dortrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, pp. 235–249.10.1007/978-94-017-2612-2_17Search in Google Scholar

8. Dummett, M. Truth, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 59(1), 1959, pp. 141–62.10.1093/aristotelian/59.1.141Search in Google Scholar

9. Dummett, M. What is a theory of meaning? (ii). In. G. Evans and J. McDowell (eds.), Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Search in Google Scholar

10. Dummett, M. A. E. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

11. Dummett, M. A. E. Origins of Analytical Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

12. Dummett, M. A E. Elements of Intuitionism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

13. Edgington, D. On conditionals, Mind, 104(414), 1995, pp. 235–329.10.1093/mind/104.414.235Search in Google Scholar

14. Edgington, D. Conditionals, Truth and Assertion. In. I. Ravenscroft (ed.), Minds, Ethics, and Conditionals: Themes From the Philosophy of Frank Jackson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267989.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

15. Girard, J.-Y. On the meaning of logical rules i: syntax versus semantics. In. U. Berger, H. Schwichtenberg (eds.), Computational Logic, NATO ASI Series, vol 165. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999, pp. 215–272.10.1007/978-3-642-58622-4_7Search in Google Scholar

16. Heyting, A. Intuitionism, Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co., 1971.Search in Google Scholar

17. Humberstone, L. The Connectives, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011.10.7551/mitpress/9055.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

18. Lecomte, A. Ludics, dialogue and inferentialism, Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 8(1), 2013.10.4148/1944-3676.1075Search in Google Scholar

19. MacFarlane, J. What is assertion? In. J. Brown and H. Cappelen (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

20. Marion, M. Why play logical games? In. O. Majer, A.-V. Pietarinen, and T. Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2009, pp. 3–26.10.1007/978-1-4020-9374-6_1Search in Google Scholar

21. Marion, M. Game semantics and the manifestation thesis. In. Rahman, Shahid, Primiero, Giuseppe, Marion, Mathieu (Eds.). The Realism-Antirealism Debate in the Age of Alternative Logics, Berlin: Springer, 2012, pp. 141–168.10.1007/978-94-007-1923-1_8Search in Google Scholar

22. Per Martin-Löf. On the meanings of the logical constants and the justifications of the logical laws, Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1(1), 1996, pp. 11–60.Search in Google Scholar

23. Martino, E. and Usberti, G. Temporal and atemporal truth in intuitionistic mathematics, Topoi, 13(2), 1994, pp. 83–92.10.1007/BF00763507Search in Google Scholar

24. Murzi, J. Knowability and Bivalence: Intuitionistic Solutions to the Paradox of Knowability, Philosophical Studies, 149(2), 2010, pp. 269–281.10.1007/s11098-009-9349-ySearch in Google Scholar

25. Novaes, C. D. A dialogical, multiagent account of the normativity of logic, Dialectica, 69(4), 2015, pp. 587–609.10.1111/1746-8361.12118Search in Google Scholar

26. Nunberg, G. The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy, Linguistics and Philosophy, 3(2), 1979, pp. 143–184.10.1007/BF00126509Search in Google Scholar

27. Pagin, P. Assertion, inference, and consequence. Synthese, 187(3), 2012, pp. 869–885.10.1007/s11229-011-9906-8Search in Google Scholar

28. Pagin, P. Assertion. In. P. Pagin (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

29. Pagin, P. Problems with norms of assertion. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 91(2), 2015.Search in Google Scholar

30. Peirce, Ch. S. Belief and judgment, C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss. Collected papers, vol. 5, 1934, pp. 376–87.Search in Google Scholar

31. Prawitz, D. Meaning approached via proofs, Synthese, 148(3), 2006, pp. 507–524.10.1007/s11229-004-6295-2Search in Google Scholar

32. Quine, W. V. Methods of Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

33. Ramsey, F. General propositions and causality. In. D. H. Mellor (ed.), Philosophical Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 145–163.Search in Google Scholar

34. Read, S. Proof-theoretic validity. In. C. Caret and O. Hjortland (eds.), Foundations of Logical Consequence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198715696.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

35. Rescorla, M. Assertion and its constitutive norms, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79(1), 2009, pp. 98–130.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00268.xSearch in Google Scholar

36. Sanford, D. H. If P, Then Q: Conditionals and the Foundations of Reasoning, London: Routledge, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

37. Shieh, S. On the conceptual foundations of anti-realism, Synthese, 115(1), 1998, pp. 33–70.10.1023/A:1005020809621Search in Google Scholar

38. Stalnaker, R. Conditional propositions and conditional assertions, In. A. Egan and B. Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

39. Sundholm, G. Constructions, proofs and the meaning of logical constants, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 12(2), 1983, pp. 151–172.10.1007/BF00247187Search in Google Scholar

40. Trafford, J. Meaning in dialogue: An interactive approach to logic and reasoning, vol. 33, Berlin: Springer, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

41. Tranchini, L. Proof-theoretic semantics, paradoxes and the distinction between sense and denotation, Journal of Logic and Computation, 2014.10.1093/logcom/exu028Search in Google Scholar

42. Watson, G. Asserting and promising, Philosophical Studies, 117(1-2), 2004, pp. 57–77.10.1023/B:PHIL.0000014525.93335.9eSearch in Google Scholar

43. Weiner, M. Must we know what we say? Philosophical Review, 114(2), 2005, pp. 227–251.10.1215/00318108-114-2-227Search in Google Scholar

44. Williamson, T. Knowing and asserting, Philosophical Review, 105(4):489–523, 1996.10.2307/2998423Search in Google Scholar

45. Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations, 4th Edition, transl. by Hacker and Schulte, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Search in Google Scholar