Reliability and Adaptability of Religious Beliefs in the Light of Cognitive Science of Religion

1. Barrett, J.L. Cognitive Science of Religion: Looking Back, Looking Forward. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, vol. 50 (2), 2011.10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01564.xSearch in Google Scholar

2. Barrett, J.L. Cognitive Science of Religion: What is it and why is it? Religion Compass, vol. 1 (6), 2007.10.1111/j.1749-8171.2007.00042.xSearch in Google Scholar

3. Barrett, J.L. Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Cognitive Science of Religion Series. Walnut Creek: Calif. and Oxford, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

4. Barrett, J.L., Jarvinen, M. J. Evolutionary byproducts and imago Dei. In. M. Jeeves (ed.). The emergence of personhood: A quantum leap? Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015, pp. 163-183.Search in Google Scholar

5. Blume, M. The Reproductive Benefits of Religious Affiliation. In. E. Voland, W. Schiefenhovel (eds.). The biological evolution of religious mind and behavior. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.10.1007/978-3-642-00128-4_8Search in Google Scholar

6. Boyer P. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley-London, 1994.10.1525/9780520911628Search in Google Scholar

7. Clark, K.J. Trusting intuitions? Book symposium: a natural history of natural theology by Helen de Cruz and Johan de Smedt, Religion, Brain & Behavior, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

8. Crivelli, C., Russell, J. A., Jarillo, S., Fernández-Dols, J.-M. The fear gasping face as a threat display in a Melanesian society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, published ahead of print October 17, 2016.10.1073/pnas.1611622113509866227791137Search in Google Scholar

9. De Cruz, H., Smedt, J. De. A natural history of natural theology. MIT, 2015.10.7551/mitpress/10219.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

10. Diamond, J. The Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal. Hutchinson Radius, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

11. Eyghen, H., Van. Religious Belief is Not Natural. Why Cognitive Science of Religion Does Not Show That Religious Belief is Trustworthy. Studia Humana, vol. 5:4, 2016, pp. 35-45.10.1515/sh-2016-0022Search in Google Scholar

12. Feierman, J. R. How Some Major Components of Religion Could Have Evolved by Natural Selection? In. E. Voland, W. Schiefenhovel (eds.). The biological evolution of religious mind and behavior. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.10.1007/978-3-642-00128-4_4Search in Google Scholar

13. Feierman, J. R. Religion's Possible Role in Facilitating Eusocial Human Societies. A Behavioral Biology (Ethological) Perspective. Studia Humana, Vol. 5:4, 2016, pp. 5-34.10.1515/sh-2016-0021Search in Google Scholar

14. Futuyma, D. J. Evolution. Sinauer Associates, INC.: Massachusetts, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

15. Garson, J. The biological mind. A philosophical introduction. Routledge: New York, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

16. Jarnefelt, E., Ford Canfield, C., Kelemen, D. The divided mind of a disbeliever: Intuitive beliefs about nature as purposefully created among different groups of non-religious adults. Cognition, 140, 2015, pp. 72-88.10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.00525880608Search in Google Scholar

17. Kahane, G. Evolutionary Debunking Arguments. Noûs, vol. 45:1, 2011.10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00770.x317580821949447Search in Google Scholar

18. Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., Seston, R. Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies. Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 2013, pp. 1074-1083.10.1037/a003039923067062Search in Google Scholar

19. Kelemen, D., Seston, R., Georges, L. The designing mind: Children’s reasoning about intended function and artifact structure. Journal of Cognition and Development, 4, 2012, pp. 439-453.10.1080/15248372.2011.608200Search in Google Scholar

20. Lewontin, R. C. The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. American Journal of Human Genetics, 26, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

21. McCauley, R. N. Why Religion is Natural and Science Is Not. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

22. Norenzayan, A. Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict. Princeton University Press, 2013.10.1515/9781400848324Search in Google Scholar

23. Peoples, H.C., Duda, P., Marlowe, F. W. Hunter-Gatherers and the Origins of Religion. Human Nature, May 2016.10.1007/s12110-016-9260-0495813227154194Search in Google Scholar

24. Purzycki, B.G., Sosis, R. The Religious System as Adaptive: Cognitive Flexibility, Public Displays, and Acceptance. In. E. Voland, W. Schiefenhovel (eds.). The biological evolution of religious mind and behavior. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

25. Rappaport, M. B., Corbally, Ch. Matrix thinking: an adaptation at the foundation of human science, religion, and art. Zygon, vol. 50, no. 1, March 2015.10.1111/zygo.12161Search in Google Scholar

26. Rottman, J., Kelemen, D. Is there such a thing as a Christian child? Evidence of religious beliefs in early childhood. In. P. McNamara, W. Wildman (eds.). Science and the world’s religions: Persons and Groups. Praeger Press: Santa Barbara, CA, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

27. Sanderson, S. K. Adaptation, evolution, and religion. Religion, 38, 2008.10.1016/j.religion.2008.01.003Search in Google Scholar

28. Sosis, R. The adaptationist-byproduct debate on the evolution of religion: five misunderstandings of the adaptationist program. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9, 2009.10.1163/156770909X12518536414411Search in Google Scholar

29. Stark, R. Rational Choice Theories of Religion. Agora, 2, 1, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

30. Sterelny, K., Joyce, R., Calcott, B., Fraser B. (eds.). Cooperation and its evolution. MIT: Cambridge MA, 2013.10.7551/mitpress/9033.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

31. Szocik, K., Herian, R. Evolutionary roots of the property rights; the natural and cultural nature of human cooperation. The Heythrop Journal, 2016.10.1111/heyj.12338Search in Google Scholar

32. Szocik, K., Szyja, A. Poland: A Dark Side of Church Cultural Policy. Studia Humana, vol. 4, Issue 4, December 2015.10.1515/sh-2015-0022Search in Google Scholar

33. Szocik, K., Walden, P. L. Why atheism is more natural than religion. Studia Religiologica, 48 (4), 2015.10.1515/sh-2015-0008Search in Google Scholar

34. Trivers, R. L. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 46, no. 1 (Mar.), 1971.10.1086/406755Search in Google Scholar

35. Voland, E. Evaluating the Evolutionary Status of Religiosity and Religiousness. In. E. Voland, W. Schiefenhovel (eds.). The biological evolution of religious mind and behavior. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.10.1007/978-3-642-00128-4_2Search in Google Scholar

36. Wilson, D. S. Darwin’s Cathedral. Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago London, 2002.Search in Google Scholar