[1. Allen, D. Commentary on: Fred J. Kauffeld’s “The epistemic relevance of social considerations in ordinary day-to-day presumptions”. OSSA Conference Archive, Paper 88, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Austin, J. L. How to do Things with Words: The William James Lectures’ delivered at Harvard University in 1955. In. J. O. Urmson (ed.), Clarendon: Oxford, 1962.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bach, K. The Top 10 Misconceptions about Implicature. In. B. Birner, G. Ward (eds.), A Festschrift for Larry Horn, John Benjamins: Amsterdam, 2005.10.1075/slcs.80.03bac]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bermejo-Luque, L. Assessing presumptions in argumentation: Being a sound presumption vs. being presumably the case. OSSA Conference Archive, Paper 22, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Eemeren, F. H., van, Grootendorst, R. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Foris Publications: Dordrecht-Holland/Cinnaminson-U.S.A, 1984.10.1515/9783110846089]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Eemeren, F. H., van, Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., Jacobs, S. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. U. Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa, 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Gilbert, M. Familiars: Culture, Grice and Super-Duper Maxims. In. D. Mohammed, M. Lewiński (eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 2015, vol. 2, College Publications: London, 2016, pp. 431-438.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Godden, D., Walton, D. A theory of presumption for everyday argumentation. Pragmatics and Cognition, 15 (2), 2007, pp. 313-346.10.1075/pc.15.2.06god]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Godden, D. Presumptions in argument: Epistemic versus social approaches. In. F. Zenker (ed.), Argumentation: Cognition & Community. Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2011, CD-ROM. Windsor, ON: OSSA, 2011, pp. 1-13.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Goodwin, J. The noncooperative pragmatics of arguing. In. Pragmatics in 2000: Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, vol. 2, 2001, pp. 263-277.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Govier, T. A Practical Study of Argument. Wadsworth: Belmont, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Green, G. M. The universality of Gricean interpretation. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 16, 1990, pp. 411-428.10.3765/bls.v16i0.1725]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Grice, H. P. Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66, reprinted in Grice 1989, (1957), pp. 377-88.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Grice, H. P. Utterer’s meaning and intention. Philosophical Review, 78 (2), 1969, pp. 147-177.10.2307/2184179]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Grice, H. P. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Harvard, 1989.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Hansen, H. Theories of Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. OSSA Conference Archive, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Kauffeld, F. J. Grice without the Cooperative Principle. OSSA Conference Archive, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Kauffeld, F. J. The ordinary practice of presuming and presumption with special attention to veracity and the burden of proof. In. F. H. v. Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Williard, A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Anyone Who has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, Kluwer Academic Publications: Dordrecht, 2003, pp.132-146.10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_11]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Kauffeld, F. J. Presuming and presumption in everyday argumentation: A response to Godden and Walton. In. M. Guarini, S. Pender (eds.), Argument Cultures: Proceedings of the Eighth OSSA Conference, Ontario Society for the Study of Argument: Windsor, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Kauffeld, F. J. The epistemic relevance of social considerations in ordinary day-to-day presumptions. OSSA Conference Archive, Paper 87, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Leech, G. N. Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics. Benjamins, 1980.10.1075/pb.i.5]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Lepore, E., Stone, M. Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Siegel, H. Presumptions in argument: Epistemic versus social approaches. OSSA Conference Archive, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Stampe, D. On the Acoustic Behavior of Rational Animals. University of Wisconsin: Madison, 1967.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Ullman-Margalit, E. On presumption. Journal of Philosophy, 80 (3), 1983, pp.143-163.10.2307/2026132]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Walton, D. N. The speech act of presumption. Pragmatics and Cognition, 1 (1), 1993, pp.125-148.10.1075/pc.1.1.08wal]Search in Google Scholar