Open Access

Presumptions in Communication


Cite

1. Allen, D. Commentary on: Fred J. Kauffeld’s “The epistemic relevance of social considerations in ordinary day-to-day presumptions”. OSSA Conference Archive, Paper 88, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

2. Austin, J. L. How to do Things with Words: The William James Lectures’ delivered at Harvard University in 1955. In. J. O. Urmson (ed.), Clarendon: Oxford, 1962.Search in Google Scholar

3. Bach, K. The Top 10 Misconceptions about Implicature. In. B. Birner, G. Ward (eds.), A Festschrift for Larry Horn, John Benjamins: Amsterdam, 2005.10.1075/slcs.80.03bacSearch in Google Scholar

4. Bermejo-Luque, L. Assessing presumptions in argumentation: Being a sound presumption vs. being presumably the case. OSSA Conference Archive, Paper 22, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

5. Eemeren, F. H., van, Grootendorst, R. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Foris Publications: Dordrecht-Holland/Cinnaminson-U.S.A, 1984.10.1515/9783110846089Search in Google Scholar

6. Eemeren, F. H., van, Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., Jacobs, S. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. U. Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

7. Gilbert, M. Familiars: Culture, Grice and Super-Duper Maxims. In. D. Mohammed, M. Lewiński (eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 2015, vol. 2, College Publications: London, 2016, pp. 431-438.Search in Google Scholar

8. Godden, D., Walton, D. A theory of presumption for everyday argumentation. Pragmatics and Cognition, 15 (2), 2007, pp. 313-346.10.1075/pc.15.2.06godSearch in Google Scholar

9. Godden, D. Presumptions in argument: Epistemic versus social approaches. In. F. Zenker (ed.), Argumentation: Cognition & Community. Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2011, CD-ROM. Windsor, ON: OSSA, 2011, pp. 1-13.Search in Google Scholar

10. Goodwin, J. The noncooperative pragmatics of arguing. In. Pragmatics in 2000: Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, vol. 2, 2001, pp. 263-277.Search in Google Scholar

11. Govier, T. A Practical Study of Argument. Wadsworth: Belmont, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

12. Green, G. M. The universality of Gricean interpretation. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 16, 1990, pp. 411-428.10.3765/bls.v16i0.1725Search in Google Scholar

13. Grice, H. P. Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66, reprinted in Grice 1989, (1957), pp. 377-88.Search in Google Scholar

14. Grice, H. P. Utterer’s meaning and intention. Philosophical Review, 78 (2), 1969, pp. 147-177.10.2307/2184179Search in Google Scholar

15. Grice, H. P. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Harvard, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

16. Hansen, H. Theories of Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. OSSA Conference Archive, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

17. Kauffeld, F. J. Grice without the Cooperative Principle. OSSA Conference Archive, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kauffeld, F. J. The ordinary practice of presuming and presumption with special attention to veracity and the burden of proof. In. F. H. v. Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Williard, A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Anyone Who has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, Kluwer Academic Publications: Dordrecht, 2003, pp.132-146.10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_11Search in Google Scholar

19. Kauffeld, F. J. Presuming and presumption in everyday argumentation: A response to Godden and Walton. In. M. Guarini, S. Pender (eds.), Argument Cultures: Proceedings of the Eighth OSSA Conference, Ontario Society for the Study of Argument: Windsor, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

20. Kauffeld, F. J. The epistemic relevance of social considerations in ordinary day-to-day presumptions. OSSA Conference Archive, Paper 87, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

21. Leech, G. N. Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics. Benjamins, 1980.10.1075/pb.i.5Search in Google Scholar

22. Lepore, E., Stone, M. Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

23. Siegel, H. Presumptions in argument: Epistemic versus social approaches. OSSA Conference Archive, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

24. Stampe, D. On the Acoustic Behavior of Rational Animals. University of Wisconsin: Madison, 1967.Search in Google Scholar

25. Ullman-Margalit, E. On presumption. Journal of Philosophy, 80 (3), 1983, pp.143-163.10.2307/2026132Search in Google Scholar

26. Walton, D. N. The speech act of presumption. Pragmatics and Cognition, 1 (1), 1993, pp.125-148.10.1075/pc.1.1.08walSearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2299-0518
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Business and Economics, Political Economics, other, Mathematics, Logic and Set Theory, Philosophy