Nicephorus Blemmydes on the Holy Trinity and the Paraconsistent Notion of Numbers: A Logical Analysis of a Byzantine Approach to the Filioque

1. Bobrinskoy, B. Le Mystère de la Trinité. Cours de théologie orthodoxe. Cerf, Paris, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

2. Boff, L. La Trinidad, la Sociedad y la Liberación. Transl. A. O. García. Ediciones Paulinas, Madrid, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

3. Bokulich, A. Bohr’s Correspondence Principle. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. E. N. Zalta (ed.). (Spring 2014 Edition), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/bohr-correspondence/>.Search in Google Scholar

4. Bolotov, B. Thèsessurle ‘Filioque’ parunthéologienrusse. Istina 17, 1972, pp. 261-289.Search in Google Scholar

5. Browne Ch. G., and Swallow, J. E. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series. vol. 7. Christian Literature Publ. Co., Buffalo, NY, 1894 (electronic edition by K. Knight at New Advent) http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3102.htm.Search in Google Scholar

6. Conticello, V. Pseudo-Cyril’s ‘De Ss. Trinitate’: A Compilation of Joseph the Philosopher. Orientalia Christiana Periodica. 61, 1995, pp. 117-129.Search in Google Scholar

7. Cross,F. Perichoresis, Deification, and Christological Predication in John of Damascus. Mediaeval Studies. 62, 2000, pp. 69-124.10.1484/J.MS.2.306471Search in Google Scholar

8. Dascalul, G. (ed., tr.), Cuvintele despre putederea Sfântului Duh ale lui Iosif Vrienie monahu, Buzěu [= Buzău], 1832.Search in Google Scholar

9. Diekamp, F. Doctrina patrum de incarnation verbi. Aschendorff, Münster, 1907.Search in Google Scholar

10. Durand, E. Perichoresis, A. Key Concept for Balancing Trinitarian Theology. In: Rethinking Trinitarian Theology: Disputed Questions and Contemporary Issues in Trinitarian Theology. G. Maspero, R. J. Woźniak (eds.), T&T Clark Int., London New York, 2012, pp. 177-192.Search in Google Scholar

11. Evdokimov, P. L’Ésprit Saint dans la tradition orthodoxe. Cerf, Paris, 1969 [reprint 2011].Search in Google Scholar

12. Gallay, P. (ed.) Grégoire de Nazianze, Discours 27-31 (Discours théologiques). Introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes. SC 250. Cerf, Paris, 1978.Search in Google Scholar

13. Getatchew Haile, Materials on the Theology of Qǝbˤat or Unction. In: Ethiopian Studies. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference. G. Goldenberg (ed.). Tel-Aviv, 14-17 April 1980. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam Boston, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

14. Goldfarb, W. Poincaré against the Logistics. In: History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics. W. Aspray, and P. Kitcher (eds.). Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, XI. Minnesota Univ. Press, Minneapolis, 1988, pp. 61-81.Search in Google Scholar

15. Golitzin, A.Adam, Eve, and Seth: Pneumatological Reflections of an Unusual Image in Gregory of Nazianzus’s “Fifth Theological Oration”. Anglican Theological Review 83, 2001, pp. 537-546.Search in Google Scholar

16. Groppe, E. T. Yves Congar’s theology of the Holy Spirit. American Academy of Religion academy series. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2004.10.1093/0195166426.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

17. Guillaumont, A. Les six centuries des “Kephalaia Gnostica” d’Évagre le Pontique. Édition critique de la version syriaque commune et édition d’une nouvelle version syriaque, intégrale, avec une double traduction française. Patrologia orientalis. Vol. 28, f. I, No. 134. Brepols: Turnhout, 1958 [reprint 1985].Search in Google Scholar

18. Haugh, R.Photius and the Carolingians. The Trinitarian Controversy. Nordland Publ. Co., Belmont, MA, 1975.Search in Google Scholar

19. Kinamori, A. Set Theory from Cantor to Cohen. In: Sets and Extensions in the Twentieth Century. D. Gabbay, A. Kinamori, and J. Woods (eds.). Handbook of the History of Logic, 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam etc., 2012, pp. 1-72.10.1016/B978-0-444-51621-3.50001-3Search in Google Scholar

20. Krausmüller, D. Between Tritheism and Sabellianism: Trinitarian Speculation in John Italos’ and Nicetas Stethatos’ Confessions of Faith. Scrinium 12, 2016 (forthcoming).10.1163/18177565-00121p14Search in Google Scholar

21. Krausmüller, D. Divine Genus - Divine Species: John Philoponus’ Impact on Contemporary Chalcedonian Theology. In: The Mystery of Christ in the Fathers of the Church: Essays in honour of D. Vincent Twomey SVD. J. Rutherford (ed.). Four Courts Press, Dublin, 2011, pp. 94-105.Search in Google Scholar

22. Krausmüller, D. Hiding in Plain Sight: Heterodox Trinitarian Speculation in the Writings of Nicetas Stethatos. Scrinium 9, 2013, pp. 255-284.10.1163/18177565-90000081Search in Google Scholar

23. Krausmüller, D. Responding to John Philoponus: Hypostases, Particular Substances and Perichoresis in the Trinity. Journal for Late Antique Religion and Culture 9, 2015, pp. 13-28.10.18573/j.2015.10330Search in Google Scholar

24. Kuratowski, C. Sur la notion de l’ordre dans la Théorie des Ensembles. Fundamenta Mathematicae 2.1, 1921, pp. 161-171.10.4064/fm-2-1-161-171Search in Google Scholar

25. Larchet, J.-C. Review of [48, v.2]. Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique 109, 2014, pp. 322-327.10.1484/J.RHE.1.103884Search in Google Scholar

26. Larchet, J.-Cl. (ed.) La vie et l’oeuvre théologique de Georges/Grégoire II de Chypre (1241Ŕ 1290) patriarche de Constantinople. Paris, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

27. Larchet, J.-Cl. Personne et nature. La Trinité - Le Christ - L’homme. Contributions aux dialogues interorthodoxe et interchrétien contemporains. Théologies. Cerf, Paris, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

28. Loenertz, R.-J. Pour la chronologie des oeuvres de Joseph Bryennios. Revue des etudes byzantines 7, 1949, pp. 12-32.10.3406/rebyz.1949.996Search in Google Scholar

29. Lourié, B. [Лурье, В. М.] Review of G. Podskalsky. Griechische Theologie in der Zeit der Türkenherrschaft (1453-1821). Die Orthodoxie im Spannungsfeld der nachreformatorischen Konfessionen des Westens. München 1988. Византийский временник 53, 1992, pp. 182-185 (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar

30. Lourié, B. What Was the Question? The Inter-Byzantine Discussions about the Filioque, Nicephorus Blemmydes, and Gregory of Cyprus. About a recent book: [26]. Scrinium10, 2014, pp. 449-506.10.1163/18177565-90000113Search in Google Scholar

31. Lourié, B. Review of [48, v.1], Scrinium 5, 2009, pp. 425-429.10.1163/18177565-90000229Search in Google Scholar

32. Lourié, B. The Paraconsistent Numbers and the Set Theory Implied in the Cappadocian Trinitarian Doctrine. Логико-философские штудии (forthcoming).Search in Google Scholar

33. Lourié, B. The Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite: An Approach to Intensional Semantics. In: Georgian Christian Thought and Its Cultural Context. Memorial Volume for the 125th Anniversary of Shalva Nutsubidze (1888Ŕ1969). T. Nutsubidze, C. B. Horn, B. Lourié, with the Collaboration of A. Ostrovsky (eds.).Texts and Studies in Eastern Christianity, 2. Brill, Leiden Boston, 2014, pp. 81-127.Search in Google Scholar

34. Lur’e, V. [=B. Lourié]. L’attitude de S.Marc d'Ephèse aux débats sur la procession du Saint- Esprit à Florence. Ses fondements dans la théologie post-palamite. Annuarium Historiae Conciliorum 21, 1989, pp. 317-333.Search in Google Scholar

35. Makarov, D. The Holy Spirit as Life and Energy. The Treatment of Athanasius’ Ad Serapionem I, 20-21 in the Late Thirteenth Century and Its Implications for the Hesychast Controversy. Byzantion80, 2010, pp. 197-246.Search in Google Scholar

36. Mortensen, Ch. Inconsistent Mathematics. Mathematics and ist applications, 312. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, 1995.10.1007/978-94-015-8453-1Search in Google Scholar

37. Neumann, J. von. Zur Einführung der transfiniten Zahlen. Acta scientiarum mathematicarum 1, 1922/23, pp. 199-208.Search in Google Scholar

38. Papadakis, A. Crisis in Byzantium: the Filioque Controversy in the Patriarchate of Gregory II of Cypurs (1283Ŕ1289). Revised edition. St. Vladimir Seminary Press, Crestwood, NY, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

39. Pelletier, F. J. Hartline, A. Ternary Exclusive Or. Logic Journal of the IGPL 16, 2008, pp. 75-83.10.1093/jigpal/jzm027Search in Google Scholar

40. Plantinga, A. God, Freedom, and Evil. W. B. Eerdmans Publ. Co., 2002.Search in Google Scholar

41. Plested, M. Orthodox Reading of Aquinas. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199650651.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

42. Poincaré, H. Du rôle de l’intuition et de la logique en mathématiques. Compte-rendu du deuxième Congrès international des mathématiciens ŕ Paris 1900. Gautier-Villars, Paris, 1902, pp. 115-130.Search in Google Scholar

43. Polemis, I. D. Nicephorus Blemmydes and Gregory Palamas. In: Gregorio Palamas e oltre. Studi e documenti sulle controversie teologiche del XIV secolo bizantino. A. Rigo (ed.) Orientalia venetiana, 16. Leo S. Olschki editore, Florence, 2004, pp. 179-189.Search in Google Scholar

44. Priest, G. Mathematical Pluralism, Logic Journal of the IGPL 21, 2013, pp. 4-13.10.1093/jigpal/jzs018Search in Google Scholar

45. Rosenfeld, L. (ed.) Niels Bohr Collected Works. vol. 3. The Correspondence Principle. J. Rud Nielsen (ed.).North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam New York Oxford, 1976.Search in Google Scholar

46. Savvides, K. (ed.) Athanasius Werke, Bd. I., Teil I., 4. Lieferung: Epistulae IŔIV ad Serapionem. W. de Gruyter, Berlin New York, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

47. Staniloae, D. Theology and the Church. Transl. R. Barringer. St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, Crestwood, NY, 1980.Search in Google Scholar

48. Stavrou, M. (éd.), Nicéphore Blemmydès, OEuvres théologiques. Introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes, v. 1, 2; SC, 517, 558. Cerf, Paris, 2007, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

49. StramaraJr., D. F. Gregory of Nyssa’s Terminology for Trinitarian Perichoresis. VigiliaeChristianae. 52, 1998, pp. 257-263.10.1163/157007298X00155Search in Google Scholar

50. Tedros Abraha. Qǝbat. In: Uhlig, S. (ed.) Encyclopaedia Aethiopica, vol. 4: OŔX.O. Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden, 2010, pp. 267-270.Search in Google Scholar

51. Thesen über das Filioque von einem russischen Theologen. Revue internationale de théologie 6, 1898, pp. 681-712.Search in Google Scholar

52. Βνύιγαξηο, Ε. (ed.).‘ωσὴυ κολατοῦ τοῦ Βρσελλίοσ, Τὰ εὑρεζέλτα. η. Α’. Leipzig, 1768.Search in Google Scholar

53. Μπελάθεο, Λ. Γ., Τὸ πξόβιεκα ηῶλ γεληθῶλ ἐλλνηῶλ θαὶ ὁ ἐλλνηνινγηθὸο ξεαιηζκὸο ηῶλ Βπδαληηλῶλ [first publ. 1978-1979]. Reprintin, Μπελάθεο, Λ. Γ. Βσδαλτηλὴ Φηιοσουία. Κείκελαθαὶ Μειέτες. Παξνπζία, Athens, 2002, pp. 107-136.Search in Google Scholar

54. Φξήζηνπ, Π. (ed.) Γρεγορίοσ τοῦ Παιακᾶ Σσγγράκκατα. Vol. Α’, Thessalonica, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

55. Болотов, В. К вопросу о Filioque. Христианское чтение, 1913, pp. 437-457; reprinted in: А. И. Бриллиантов, Труды по истории древней Церкви, Библиотека христианской мысли. Исследования,vol. 2. Издательство Олега Абышко: St. Petersburg, 2006, pp. 349-381.Search in Google Scholar

56. Бриллиантов, А. И. Труды проф. В. В. Болотова по вопросу о Filioque и полемика о его «Тезисах о Filioque» в русской литературе [Brilliantov, A. I., Prof. V. V. Bolotov’s Works on the Question of Filioque and Polemics on his “Theses on the Filioque” in Russian Literature]. Reprinted in: А. И. Бриллиантов, Труды по истории древней Церкви, Библиотека христианской мысли. Исследования. vol. 2. Издательство Олега Абышко, St. Petersburg, 2006, 308-334.Search in Google Scholar

57. Лурье, В. М. Взаимосвязь проблемы Filioque с учением о обожении у православных богословов после св. Фотия [B. Lourié. Mutual Relations between the Problem of Filioque and the Doctrine of Theosis in the Orthodox Theologians after St. Photius]. Патрология. Философия. Герменевтика. Труды Высшей религиозно-философской школы. 1. Высшая религиозно- философская школа, St. Petersburg, 1992, pp. 1-19.Search in Google Scholar

58. Лурье, В. М. История византийской философии. Формативный период [B. Louri・ The History of the Byzantine Philosophy. The Formative Period]. Axiōma, St. Petersburg, 2006. Search in Google Scholar