[ADAMS, W. T. and D. G. JOYCE (1990): Comparison of selection methods for improving volume growth in young coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet. 39: 219-226.]Search in Google Scholar
[BAKER, R. J. (1986): Selection Indices in Plant Breeding. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. ]Search in Google Scholar
[BORRALHO, N. M. G., P. J. KANOWSKI and P. P. COTTERILL (1992): Genetic control of growth of Eucalyptus globulus in Portugal. I. Genetic and phenotypic parameters. Silvae Genet. 41: 39-45.]Search in Google Scholar
[BOUVET, J. M., P. VIGNERON, E. VILLAR and A. SAYA (2007): Determining the optimal age for selection by modelling the age-related trends in genetic parameters in Eucalyptus hybrid populations. Silvae Genet. 58: 102-112.10.1515/sg-2009-0014]Search in Google Scholar
[BRUCE, D. and D. J. DEMARS (1974): Volume equations for second-growth Douglas fir. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Pac. Northwest For. Range Exp. Stn., Res. Note 239.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHEN, X. Y., B. HAWKINS, C. Y. XIE and C. C. YING (2003): Age trends in genetic parameters and early selection of lodgepole pine provenance with reference to the Lambeth model. For. Genet. 10: 249-258.]Search in Google Scholar
[CORNELIUS, J. (1994): Heritabilities and additive genetic coefficients of variation in forest trees. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 372-379.]Search in Google Scholar
[COTTERILL, P. P. and C. A. DEAN (1988): Changes in genetic control of growth of radiata pine to 16 years and efficiences of early selection. Silvae Genet. 37: 138-146.]Search in Google Scholar
[COTTERILL, P. P. and J. W. JAMES (1984): Number of offspring and plot sizes required for progeny testing. Silvae Genet. 33: 203-209.]Search in Google Scholar
[DALE, V. H., T. W. DOYLE and H. H. SHUGART (1985): A comparison of tree growth models. Ecol. Model. 29: 145-169.10.1016/0304-3800(85)90051-1]Search in Google Scholar
[DEAN, C. A. and R. W. STONECYPHER (2006): Early selection of Douglas-fir across south central coastal Oregon, USA. Silvae Genet. 55: 135-141.10.1515/sg-2006-0019]Search in Google Scholar
[DICKERSON, G. E. and L. N. HAZEL (1944): Effectiveness of selection on progeny performance as a supplement to earlier culling in live stock. J. Agric. Res. 69: 459-476.]Search in Google Scholar
[FALCONER, D. S. and T. F. C. MACKAY (1996): Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[FOSTER, G. S. (1986): Trends in genetic parameters with stand development and their influence on early selection for volume growth in loblolly pine. For. Sci. 32: 944-959.]Search in Google Scholar
[FOSTER, G. S. (1989): Inter-genotypic competition in forest trees and its impact on realized gain from family selection. P. 21-35. In: Proc. 20th So. For. Tree Improv. Conf., Charleston, SC.]Search in Google Scholar
[GILMOUR, A. R., B. J. GOGEL, B. R. CULLIS and R. THOMPSON (2009): ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. NSW Department of Industry and Investment, Harpenden, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[GREAVES, B. L., N. M. G. BORRALHO and C. A. RAYMOND (2003): Early selection in eucalypt breeding in Australia - optimum selection age to minimise the total cost of kraft pulp production. New For. 25: 201-210.10.1023/A:1022996930025]Search in Google Scholar
[GWAZE, D. P. and F. E. BRIDGWATER (2002): Determing the optimum selection age for diameter and height in loblolly pine. For. Genet. 9: 159-165.]Search in Google Scholar
[GWAZE, D. P., F. E. BRIDGWATER, T. BYRAM, J. A. WOOLLIAMS and C. G. WILLIAMS (2000): Predicting age-age genetic correlations in tree breeding programs: a case study of Pinus taeda L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 199-206.]Search in Google Scholar
[GWAZE, D. P., J. A. WODLIAMS and P. J. KANDOWSKI (1997): Optimum selection age for height in Pinus taeda L. in Zimbabwe. Silvae Genet. 46: 358-365.]Search in Google Scholar
[HAAPANEN, M. (2001): Time trends in genetic parameter estimates and selection efficiency for Scots pine in relation to field testing method. For. Genet. 8: 129-144.]Search in Google Scholar
[HUSCH, B., C. I. MILLER and T. W. BEERS (1972): Forest Mensuration. John and Sons, New York. ]Search in Google Scholar
[JANSSON, G., B. LI and B. HANNRUP (2003): Time trends in genetic parameters for height and optimal age for parental selection in Scots pine. For. Sci. 49: 696-705.]Search in Google Scholar
[JOHNSON, G. R., R. A. SNIEZKO and N. L. MANDEL (1997): Age trends in Douglas-fir genetic parameters and implications for optimum selection age. Silvae Genet. 46: 349-358.]Search in Google Scholar
[KANG, H. (1985): Juvenile selection in tree breeding: Some mathematical models. Silvae Genet. 34: 75-84.]Search in Google Scholar
[KING, J. N. and R. D. BURDON (1991): Time trends in inheritance and projected efficiencies of early selection in a large 17-year-old progeny test of Pinus radiata. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 1200-1207.]Search in Google Scholar
[KING, J. N., F. C. YEH and J. C. H. HEAMAN (1988): Selection of growth and yield traits in controlled crosses of coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet. 37: 158-164.]Search in Google Scholar
[LAMBETH, C. and L. A. DILL (2001): Prediction models for juvenile-mature correlations for loblolly pine growth traits within, between and across sites. For. Genet. 8: 101-108.]Search in Google Scholar
[LAMBETH, C. C. (1980): Juvenile-mature correlations in Pinaceae and implications for early selection. For. Sci. 26: 571-580.]Search in Google Scholar
[LAMBETH, C. C., J. P. VAN BUIJTENEN, S. D. DUKE and R. B. MCCULLOUGH (1983): Early selection is effective in 20- year-old genetic tests of loblolly pine. Silvae Genet. 32: 210-215.]Search in Google Scholar
[LEE, S. J., J. WOOLLIAMS, C. J. A. SAMUEL and D. C. MALCOLM (2002): A study of population variation and inheritance in Sitka spruce. II. Age trends in genetic parameters for vigour traits and optimum selection ages Silvae Genet. 51: 55-65.]Search in Google Scholar
[MAGNUSSEN, S. (1988): Minimum age-to-age correlations in early selections. For. Sci. 34: 928-938.]Search in Google Scholar
[MAGNUSSEN, S. and A. D. YANCHUK (1993): Selection age and risk: finding the compromise. Silvae Genet. 42: 25-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[MATHESON, A. C., D. J. SPENCER and D. MAGNUSSEN (1994): Optimum age for selection in Pinus radiata using basal area under bark for age:age correlations. Silvae Genet. 43: 352-357.]Search in Google Scholar
[MCKEAND, S. E. (1988): Optimum age for family selection for growth in genetic tests of Loblolly pine. For. Sci. 34:]Search in Google Scholar
[MCKINLEY, C. R. and W. J. LOWE (1986): Juvenile-mature correlation. In: Advanced Generation Breeding of Forest Trees. Southern Cooperative Series Bull. No. 309: 11-15.]Search in Google Scholar
[NAMKOONG, G. (1979): Introduction to quantitative genetics in forestry. U. S. Dep. Agric., Tech. Bull. No. 1588, 342p..]Search in Google Scholar
[NAMKOONG, G., R. A. USANIS and R. R. SILEN (1972): Agerelated variation in genetic control of height growth in Douglas-fir. Theor. Appl. Genet. 42: 151-159.]Search in Google Scholar
[ROBERTSON, A. (1957): Optimum group size in progeny testing and family selection. Biometrics 13: 442-450.10.2307/2527971]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHUTZ, W. M. and C. C. COCKERHAM (1966): The effect of field blocking on gain from selection. Biometrics 22: 843-863.10.2307/2528078]Search in Google Scholar
[SILEN, R. R. (1978): Genetics of Douglas-fir. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. WO-35 34 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[SILEN, R. R. and J. G. WHEAT (1979): Progressive tree improvement program in coastal Douglas-fir. J. For. 77: 78-83.]Search in Google Scholar
[SMITH, J. H. G. and J. DEMAERSCHALK (1974): Final report on PC005. Volume tables for young trees for B.C. Forest Service Productivity Committee. B.C. For. Serv., Victoria, B.C.. ]Search in Google Scholar
[STONECYPHER, R. W., R. F. PIESCH, G. G. HELLAND, J. G. CHAPMAN and H. J. RENO (1996): Results from genetic tests of selected parents of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [MIRB.] FRANCO) in an applied tree improvement program. For. Sci. Mono. 32: 1-35.]Search in Google Scholar
[WENG, Y. H., K. J. TOSH, Y. S. PARK and M. S. FULLARTON (2007): Age-related trends in genetic parameters for jack pine and their implications for early selection. Silvae Genet. 56: 242-252.10.1515/sg-2007-0035]Search in Google Scholar
[WHITE, T. (1996): Genetic parameter estimates and breeding value predictions: issues and implications in tree improvement programs. P. 110-117. In: Tree improvement for sustainable tropical forestry QFRI IUFRO Conference, Caloundra, Queensland, Australia. October 27 - November 1, 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[WHITE, T. L. and G. R. HODGE (1992): Test designs and optimum age for parental selection in advanced-generation progeny tests of slash pine. Silvae Genet. 41: 293-302.]Search in Google Scholar
[WHITE, T. W., W. T. ADAMS and D. B. NEALE (2007): Forest Genetics. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. 10.1079/9781845932855.0000]Search in Google Scholar
[WOODS, J. H., D. KOLOTELO and A. D. YANCHUK (1995): Early selection of coastal Douglas-fir in a farm-field test environment. Silvae Genet. 44: 178-185.]Search in Google Scholar
[XIANG, B., B. LI and F. ISIK (2003): Time trend of genetic parameters in growth traits of Pinus taeda L. Silvae Genet. 52: ]Search in Google Scholar
[XIE, C.-Y. and C. C. YING (1996): Heritabilities, age-age correlations, and early selection in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta ssp. Latifolia). Silvae Genet. 45: 101-107.]Search in Google Scholar
[ZOBEL, B. and J. TALBERT (1984): Applied Forest Tree Improvement. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.]Search in Google Scholar