Intonation and Particles as Speech Act Modifiers: A Syntactic Analysis

Anderson, Stephen R. 1971. On the linguistic status of the performative/constative distinction. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Search in Google Scholar

Avis, Walter. S. 1972. So eh? is Canadian, eh. Canadian journal of linguistics 17(2). 89–104.Search in Google Scholar

Bach, Kent & Robert Harnish. 1979. Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Search in Google Scholar

Bartels Christine. 1999. The intonation of English statements and questions. New York: Garland Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Beyssade, Claire & Jean-Marie Marandin. 2006. The speech act assignment problem revisited: Disentangling speaker’s commitment from speaker’s call on addressee. In Selected Papers of CSSP 2005, 37–68. http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss6/index_en.html.Search in Google Scholar

Burton, Strang & Lisa Matthewson. 2015. Targeted construction storyboards in semantic fieldwork. In Ryan Bochnak & Lisa Matthewson (eds.), Methodologies in semantic fieldwork. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190212339.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Casselman, Bill. 2015. The true story of a Canadian interjection eh?http://www.billcasselman.com/casselmania/mania_eh.htm.Search in Google Scholar

Columbus, Georgie. 2010. A comparative analysis of invariant tags in three varieties of English. English World-Wide 31(3). 288–310.10.1075/eww.31.3.03colSearch in Google Scholar

Denis, Derek 2015. The development of pragmatic markers in Canadian English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Search in Google Scholar

Denis, Derek, Martina Wiltschko & Alex d’Arcy. 2016. Deconstructed multi-functionality: Confirmational variation in Canadian English through time. Talk presented at DiPVaC3, University of Ottawa. May.Search in Google Scholar

Groenendijk, Jeroen & Martin Stokhof. 1984. On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Varieties of formal semantics 3. 143–170.Search in Google Scholar

Gunlogson, Christine. 2013. True to form: Rising and falling declaratives as questions in English. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill. 2013. The syntactization of discourse. In Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds.), Syntax and its limits, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018Search in Google Scholar

Hamblin, Charles L. 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of language. 41–53.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Virginia. 2013. Vocatives: How syntax meets with pragmatics. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004261389Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Marion. 1976. Canadian eh. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 153–160.Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser, Sebastian & Stefan Baumann. 2013. Satzmodus und die Diskurspartikel hm: Intonation und interpretation. Linguistische Berichte 236. 473–496.Search in Google Scholar

Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and philosophy 1(1). 3–44.10.1007/BF00351935Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 2016. The silence of heads. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37(1). 1–3710.1515/scl-2016-0001Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 2013. Response particles as propositional anaphors. In Todd Snider (ed.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 23, 1–18. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v23i0.2676Search in Google Scholar

Lam, Zoe Wai-Man. 2014. A complex forceP for speaker- and addressee-oriented discourse particles in Cantonese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 35(2). 61–80.Search in Google Scholar

Leung, Wai Mun. 2008. Promising approaches for the analysis of sentence-final particles in Cantonese. Asian Social Science 4(5). 74–82.10.5539/ass.v4n5p74Search in Google Scholar

Malamud, Sophia A. & Tamina C. Stephenson. Three ways to avoid commitments: Declarative force modifiers in the conversational scoreboard. Journal of Semantics 31. 1–37.Search in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet & Julia Hirschberg. 1990. The Meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in communication, 271–311. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John R. 1970. On declarative sentences. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 222–272. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn & Co.Search in Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold M. 1974. Toward a linguistic theory of speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1985. Sentence types. In Timothy Shopen (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume 1, Clause structure, 155–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Speas, Peggy & Carol Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anne-Marie Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar. Volume 1, Syntax and semantics, 315–343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.57.15speSearch in Google Scholar

Svenonius, Peter. 2012. Spanning. Ms., University of Tromsø. http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/001501.Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5). 701–721.10.1023/A:1020867916902Search in Google Scholar

Sybesma, Rint & Boya Li. 2007. The dissection and structural mapping of Cantonese sentence final particles. Lingua 117(10). 1739–1783.10.1016/j.lingua.2006.10.003Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Sze-Wing. 2015. Cartographic syntax of pragmatic projections. In Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson & Wei-tien Dylan Tsai (eds.), Chinese Syntax in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 429–441. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945658.003.0016Search in Google Scholar

Thoma, Sonja. 2016. Discourse particles and the syntax of discourse. Evidence from Miesbach Bavarian. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.Search in Google Scholar

Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2012. Semantics of intonation. In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics. An international handbook of natural language meaning. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Wakefield, John. 2010. The English equivalents of Cantonese sentence-final particles: A contrastive analysis. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The universal structure of categories: Towards a formal typology. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139833899Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. To appear. Ergative constellations in the structure of speech acts. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina & Johannes Heim. To appear. The syntax of sentence peripheral discourse markers. Towards a neo-performative analysis.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 2003. Representation theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Wing-Li. 2008. An acoustic phonetic study of the intonation of sentence-final particles in Hong Kong Cantonese. Asian Social Science 4(2). 23–29.10.5539/ass.v4n2p23Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Ling. 2014. Segmentless sentence-final particles in Cantonese: An experimental study. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 35(2). 47–60.Search in Google Scholar