Fiscal Decentralization and Delivery of Public Services: Evidence from Education Sector in Pakistan

Alderman, H. (1998). “Social Assistance in Albania: Decentralization and Targeted Transfers”. LSMS Working Paper no. 134, World Bank, Washington D.C.10.1596/0-8213-4245-2Search in Google Scholar

Azfar, O. and J. Livingston (2002). “Federalist Disciplines or Local Capture? An Empirical Analysis of Decentralization in Uganda.” IRIS, University of Maryland.Search in Google Scholar

Azfar, O., S. Kahkonen, and P. Meagher (2001). “Conditions for Effective Decentralised Governance: A Synthesis of Research Findings.” IRIS working paper # 256, University of Maryland.Search in Google Scholar

Azfar, O., S. Kahkonen, J. Livingston, P. Meagher, and D. Rutherford (2000). “Making Decentralization Work: An Empirical Investigation of Governance and Public Services in Uganda.” IRIS, University of Maryland.Search in Google Scholar

Azfar, O.,T. Gurgur, S. Kahkonen, A. Lanyi, and P. Meagher (2000). “Decentralization and Governance: An empirical investigation of public service delivery in the Philippines.” IRIS, University of Maryland.Search in Google Scholar

Bardhan, P. and D. Mookherjee, 1998, “Expenditure Decentralization and the Delivery of Public Services in Developing Countries”, CIDER Working Paper C98/104.Search in Google Scholar

Bardhan, P. and D. Mookherjee (2003). “Poverty Alleviation Effort of West Bengal Panchayats”.http://econ.bu.edu/dilipm/wkpap.htm/epwsumm.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller, (1981), “Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root”, Econometrica, 49, 1057-1079.10.2307/1912517Search in Google Scholar

Enikolopov, R. and E. Zhuravskaya (2003). “Decentralization and Political Institutions.”http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/webfac/bardhan/e271_f03/oct6.pdf10.2139/ssrn.408060Search in Google Scholar

Eskeland, G. and D. Filmer (2002). “Autonomy, Participation, and Learning in Argentine Schools: Findings and Their Implications for Decentralization.” Policy Research Working Paper 2766. World Bank, Washington DC.Search in Google Scholar

Eskeland, G. and D. Filmer, 2000, “Does Decentralization Improve Learning? Autonomy and Parental Participation in Argentine Schools”, mimeo, World Bank.Search in Google Scholar

Estache, A. and S. Sinha (1995). “Does Decentralization Increase Spending on Public Infrastructure?” The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1457.Search in Google Scholar

Faguet, J. and Paul G., 2001, “Does Decentralization Increase Government Responsiveness to Local Needs? Evidence from Bolivia”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2516.10.2139/ssrn.260579Search in Google Scholar

Faguet, J. P. (1997). “Decentralization and Local Government Performance.” World Bank/FAO/GTZ paper for the Technical Consultation on Decentralization, Rome.Search in Google Scholar

Faguet, J.P. (2001). “Does Decentralization Increase Responsiveness to Local Needs? Evidence from Bolivia.” Policy Research Working Paper #2516. World Bank, Washington DC.10.2139/ssrn.260579Search in Google Scholar

Gurgur, T. and A. Shah (2002). “Localization and Corruption: Panacea or Pandora’s Box?” In Ehtisham Ahmad and Vito Tanzi,veditors, Managing Fiscal Decentralization, pp. 46–67. Routledge Press, London and New York.Search in Google Scholar

Galasso, E. and M. Ravallion (2001). “Decentralised Targeting of an Anti-Poverty Program.” Development Research Group Working Paper. World Bank, Washington D.C.10.1596/1813-9450-2738Search in Google Scholar

Galasso, E. and M. Ravallion (1998). “Reaching Poor Areas in a Federal System.” Policy Research Working Paper #1901. World Bank, Washington DC.Search in Google Scholar

Habibi, N., C. Huang, D. Miranda, V. Murillo, G. Ranis, M. Sarkar, and F. Stewart (2001). “Decentralization in Argentina.” Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper 825, Yale University.Search in Google Scholar

Huther, J. and A. Shah (1998). “Applying a Simple Measure of Good Governance to the Debate on Fiscal Decentralization.” Policy Research Working Paper Number 1894. World Bank, Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar

Isham, J. and S. Kähkönen (1999). “What Determines the Effectiveness of Community-based Water Projects? Evidence from Central Java, Indonesia on Demand Responsiveness, Service Rules, and Social Capital.” University of Maryland.Search in Google Scholar

Khaleghian, P (2003). “Decentralization and Public Services: The Case of Immunization.” Policy Research Working Paper 2989. World Bank, Washington, DC.10.1596/1813-9450-2989Search in Google Scholar

King, E. and B. Ozler (1998). “What’s Decentralization Got To Do With Learning? The Case of Nicaragua’s School Autonomy Reform. Development,” Research Group Working Paper, World Bank, Washington D.C.Search in Google Scholar

Lieberman, S.S., (2002), “Decentralization and Health in the Philippines and Indonesia: An Interim Report”, East Asia Human Development.Search in Google Scholar

Litvack, J. and J. Seddon (1999), “Decentralization Briefing Notes”, World Bank Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Narayan, P. K. (2005), “The savings and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests,” Applied Economics, 37, 1979-1990.10.1080/00036840500278103Search in Google Scholar

Narayan, P.K., Narayan, S., (2005), “Estimating income and price elasticities of imports for Fiji in a cointegration framework,” Economic Modelling, 22, 423–438.10.1016/j.econmod.2004.06.004Search in Google Scholar

Oates, W. (1972). “Fiscal Federalism”, Hamshire, England: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1972.Search in Google Scholar

Oates, W. (1977). “The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism”, Lexington Books, Toronto 1977.Search in Google Scholar

Oates, W. (1999). “An essay on fiscal federalism”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVII (September 1999), pp. 1120-1149.Search in Google Scholar

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. and R. J. Smith, (2001), “Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of long run relationships”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326.10.1002/jae.616Search in Google Scholar

Pesaran, M.H. and Shin, Y. (1999), “An autoregressive distributed-led modeling approach to cointegration analysis.” In Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century. The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, ed. Steinar Strom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pakistan. Finance Division, Economic Advisor’s Wing: Economic Survey 2010-2011. Islamabad.Search in Google Scholar

Pakistan. Ministry of Education & MSU. GOP. (2003). Technical Group Meeting on Devolution and Decentralization: Implications for the Education Sector. Islamabad.Search in Google Scholar

Pakistan. Ministry of Education, Education For All Wing. (2002). Facts and Figures: Islamabad.Search in Google Scholar

Pakistan. Ministry of Education. (2003). Education Sector Reforms: Action Plan 2001-2005. Islamabad.Search in Google Scholar

Pakistan. Ministry of Education. (2001). Education Sector Reforms: Action Plan 2001-2004. Islamabad.Search in Google Scholar

Pakistan. Ministry of Education. (2003). National Plan of Action on Education for All (2001-2015): Islamabad.Search in Google Scholar

Qian, Y. and Weingast (1997). “Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives”, Journal of Economic perspectives, Vol II, No. 4: 83-92.10.1257/jep.11.4.83Search in Google Scholar

Saeed, M. (2007). “Education System of Pakistan and the UK: Comparisons in Context to Inter provincial and Inter-countries Reflections.” Bulletin of Education & Research, 29 (2), 43-57.Search in Google Scholar

Shah, A (1998). “Balance, Accountability and responsiveness – Lessons About Decentralization.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 2021, December, World Bank, Washington, DCSearch in Google Scholar

Shah, A (1998). “Fiscal Federalism and Macroeconomic Governance – For Better or For Worse?” Policy Research Working Paper No. 2005, November, World Bank, Washington, DC10.1596/1813-9450-2005Search in Google Scholar

Shah, A. (1994). “The Reform of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Developing and Emerging Market Economies.” World Bank, Washington, DC.10.1596/0-8213-2836-0Search in Google Scholar

Shah, D.(2003). “Decentralization of educational system in Pakistan”, Presented at UNESCO Seminar on Decentralization Policies and Strategies in Education held at Buenos Aires, Argentina from 30th June to 3rd July, 2003Search in Google Scholar

Shah, D. (2003). “Decentralization in the education system of Pakistan: Policies and strategies.” Paper presented in UNESCO Seminar on Decentralization Policies and Strategies in Education, Buenos Aires, Argentina (p.20-21).Search in Google Scholar

Shami, P.A. & Hussain, K.S. (2006). “Development of education in Pakistan.” Islamabad. Academy of Educational Planning and Management, Ministry of Education (p.11-13 & 61)Search in Google Scholar

West, L. and C. Wong (1995). “Fiscal Decentralization and Growth Regional Disparities in Rural China: Some Evidence in the Provision of Social Services.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 11(4): 70 – 84.10.1093/oxrep/11.4.70Search in Google Scholar

Winkler, D. “Decentralization in Education: An Economic Perspective.” Washington, DC: World Bank, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

Winkler, D. “The Design and Administration of Intergovernmental Transfers: Fiscal Decentralization in Latin America.” World Bank Discussion Paper 235. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1994.10.1596/0-8213-2822-0Search in Google Scholar

Winkler, D. and Gershberg, Alec. “Education Decentralization in Latin America: The Effects on the Quality of Schooling.” Human Development Department LCSHD Paper Series No. 59. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Winkler, D. and T. Rounds (1996). “Municipal and Private Sector Response to Decentralization and School Choice.” Economics of Education Review. 15 (4): 365–376.10.1016/S0272-7757(96)00036-2Search in Google Scholar

Zafar, F. (2003) “Fiscal Devolution in Education. Case Study Reflecting Initial Responses.” Islamabad: Ministry of Education.Search in Google Scholar