Pike Esox Lucius Distribution and Feeding Comparisons in Natural and Historically Channelized River Sections

[1] Vorosmarty C. J., McIntyre P. B., Gessner M. O., Dudgeon D., Prusevich A., Green P., Glidden S., et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 2010:467:555–561.10.1038/nature0944020882010Search in Google Scholar

[2] Lepori F., Palm D., Brannas E., Malmqvist B. Does restoration of structuralheterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecol.Appl. 2005:15:2060–2071.10.1890/04-1372Search in Google Scholar

[3] Trigal C., Degerman E. Multiple factors and thresholds explaining fish species distributions in lowland streams. Global Ecology and Conservation 2015:4:589–601. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2015.10.00910.1016/j.gecco.2015.10.009Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bolonina A., Comoglio C., Calles O., Kunickis M. Strategies for Mitigating the Impact of Hydropower Plants on the Stocks of Diadromous Species in the Daugava River. Energy Procedia 2016:95:81–88. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.02710.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.027Search in Google Scholar

[5] Simpson P. W., Newman J. R., Keirn M. A., Matter R. M., Guthrie P. A. Manual of Stream Channelization Impacts on Fish and Wildlife. Washington, DC: Fish and Wildlife Service, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Lewczuk K. G., Burandt P. Effect of river straightening on the hydrochemical properties of floodplain lakes: Observations from the Łyna and Drweca Rivers, N Poland. Ecological Engineering 2011:37:786–795. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.07.02810.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.07.028Search in Google Scholar

[7] Ormerod S. J. Current issues with fish and fisheries: editor's overview and introduction. J. Appl. Ecol. 2003:40:204–213. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00824.x10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00824.xSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Schinegger R., Palt M., Segurado P., Schmutz S. Untangling the effects of multiple human stressors and their impacts on fish assemblages in European running waters. Science of the Total Environment 2016:573:1079–1088. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.14310.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.14327632785Search in Google Scholar

[9] Birzaks J. Latvijas upju zivju sabiedrības un to noteicosie faktori. PhD thesis, Riga, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Thompson L., Larsen R. Fish Habitat in Freshwater Streams. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of California, 2004.10.3733/ucanr.8112Search in Google Scholar

[11] Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre. Upju baseinu apgabalu apsaimniekosanas plani un pludu riska parvaldibas plani. [10.04.2016.] Available: http://www.meteo.lv/lapas/vide/udens/udens-apsaimniekosana-/upju-baseinu-apsaimniekosanas-plani-/upju-baseinu-apsaimniekosanas-plani?id=1107&nid=424Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kobler A., Klefoth T., Wolter C., Fredrich F., Arlinghaus R. Contrasting pike (Esox lucius L.) movement and habitat choice between summer and winter in a small lake. Hydrobiologia 2008:601:17–27. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-9263-210.1007/s10750-007-9263-2Search in Google Scholar

[13] Harvey B. 2009. A biologicalsynopsis of northern pike (Esox lucius). Canadian Manuscript Reports of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2009:2885:31.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Winfield I. J., Fletcher J. M., James J. B. Long-term changes in the diet of pike (Esox lucius), the top aquatic predator in a changing Windermere. Freshwater Biology 2012:57(2):373–383. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02607.x10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02607.xSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Mann R. H. K. 1996. Fisheries and economics. Pike: Biology and Exploitation. Fish and Fisheries Series 19. London: Chapman & Hall, 1996. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8775-4_910.1007/978-94-015-8775-4_9Search in Google Scholar

[16] Wetzel G. R. Limnology. Lake and Rivers ecosystems. Third edition. London: Academic press, 2001.10.1016/B978-0-08-057439-4.50004-6Search in Google Scholar

[17] Svanback R, Bolnick D. I. Intraespecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2007:274:39–44. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.019810.1098/rspb.2006.0198209396917251094Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sandlund O. T., Museth J., Oistad S. Migration, growth patterns, and diet of pike (Esox lucius) in a river reservoir and its inflowing river. Fisheries Research 2016:173:53–60. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2015.08.01010.1016/j.fishres.2015.08.010Search in Google Scholar

[19] Craig J. F. A short review of pike ecology. Hydrobiologia 2008:601:5–16. doi:10.1007/s10750-007-9262-310.1007/s10750-007-9262-3Search in Google Scholar

[20] GIS Latvija 1:500000. LU GZZF WMS. [06.10.2015.] Available: http://kartes.geo.lu.lvSearch in Google Scholar

[21] Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health, and Environment “BIOR” Fish Resources Research Department unpublished data.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Kottelat M., Freyhof J. Handbook of European freshwater fishes. Cornol: Publications Kottelat, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Nilsson A. Aquatic Insects of North Europe. A Taxonomic Handbook. CD-Rom edition, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Hyslop E. J. Stomach contents analysis—A review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology 1980:17:411–429. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1980.tb02775.x10.1111/j.1095-8649.1980.tb02775.xSearch in Google Scholar

[25] Addinsoft, 2016. XLSTAT, Data and statistical analysis with MS Excel. Addinsoft, USA. [05.04.2016.] Available: https://www.xlstat.com/en/Search in Google Scholar

[26] ORTOFOTO 5. LGIA Latvijas 5. etapa ortofoto karsu mozaika meroga 1:10 000. LU GZZF WMS. [12.04.2016.] Available: http://kartes.geo.lu.lvSearch in Google Scholar

[27] Upju baseini 1970tie. LPSR Upju baseinu karsu mozaika meroga 1:100 000. LU GZZF WMS. [12.03.2016.] Available: http://kartes.geo.lu.lvSearch in Google Scholar

[28] VSIA. Zemkopibas ministrijas nekustamie ipasumi. Melioracijas digitalais kadastrs. [15.04.2016.] Available: http://www.melioracija.lv/Search in Google Scholar

[29] VSIA. Zemkopības ministrijas nekustamie ipasumi. unpublished data.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Raat A. J. P. Synopsis of biological data on northen pike (Esox lucius). FAO Fisheries Department, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Inskip P. D. Habitat suitability index models: northern pike. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Dominguez J., Pena J. C. 2000: Spatio-temporal variation in the diet of Northern Pike (Esox lucius) in a colonized area (Esla Basin, NW Spain). Limnetica 2000:19:1–20.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Alp A., Yegen V., Apaydin Yagci M., Uysal R., Biçen E., Yagci A. Diet composition and prey selection of the pike, Esox lucius, in Çivril Lake, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 2008:24:670–677.10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01119.xSearch in Google Scholar

[34] Soupir C. A., Brown M. L., Kallemeyn L. W. Trophic ecology of largemouth bass and northern pike in allopatric and sympatric assemblages in northern boreal lakes. Can. J. Zool. 2000:78:1759–1766. doi:10.1139/z00-12610.1139/z00-126Search in Google Scholar

[35] Lorenzoni M. Corboli M. Dorr A. J. M., Giovinazzo G., Selvi S., Mearelli M. Diets of Micropterus salmoides Lac. And Esoxlucius L. in Lake Trasimeno (Umbria, Italy) and their diet overlap. Bull. Francais Peche Piscicult. 2002:365/366:537–547. doi:10.1051/kmae:200205010.1051/kmae:2002050Search in Google Scholar

[36] Elvira B., Nicola G. G., Almodovar A. Pike and red swamp crayfish: a new case on predator – prey relationship between aliens in central Spain. J. Fish Biol. 1996:48:437–446. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb01438.x10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb01438.xSearch in Google Scholar

[37] Mero T. O. 2014. Diet in pike (Esox lucius) in northwestern Vojvodina (Serbia). Nat. Croat. 2014:23(1):27–34.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Simaika J. P., Stoll S., Lorenz A. W., Thomas G., Sundermann A., Haase P. 2015. Bundles of stream restoration measures and their effects on fish communities. Limnologica 2015:55:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.limno.2015.10.00110.1016/j.limno.2015.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[39] Eklov P. Effects of habitat complexity and prey abundance on the spatial and temporal distributions of perch (Perca fluviatilis) and pike (Esox lucius). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1997:54:1520–1531. doi:10.1139/f97-05910.1139/f97-059Search in Google Scholar

[40] Fieseler C., Wolter C. A fish-based typology os small temparate rivers in the north-eastern lowlands of Germany. Limnologica 2006:36:2–16. doi:10.1016/j.limno.2005.10.00110.1016/j.limno.2005.10.001Search in Google Scholar