The Study Into Potential Enhacement Of Metalworking Fluids Biodegradability By The Application Of O3/UV

1. Supplement to the methodology for risk evaluation of biocides Harmonisation of Environmental Emission Scenarios for biocides used as metalworking fluid preservatives (Product type 13) European Commission DG ENV / RIVM. Eur. Comm. DG ENV / RIVM, 2003, p. 61.Search in Google Scholar

2. El BARADIE, M., A., CUTTING FLUIDS: PART II. RECYCLING AND CLEAN MACHINING. 1996. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 0136, pp. 798–806.Search in Google Scholar

3. BENITO, M., et al. 2002. Design and construction of a modular pilot plant for the treatment of oil-containing wastewaters. Desalination, vol. 147, pp. 5–10.Search in Google Scholar

4. CHENG, C., et al. 2005. Treatment of spent metalworking fluids. Water Res., vol. 39, pp. 4051–4063.Search in Google Scholar

5. CHANG, I., et al. 2001. Treatment of oily wastewater by ultrafiltration and ozone. Desalination, vol. 133, pp. 225–232.Search in Google Scholar

6. MUSZYŃSKI, A., ŁEBKOWSKA, M. 2005. Biodegradation of Used Metalworking Fluids in Wastewater Treatment. Polish J. Environ. Stud., 14(1), pp. 73–79.Search in Google Scholar

7. C. J. van der GAST, et al. 2004. Temporal dynamics and degradation activity of an bacterial inoculum for treating waste metal-working fluid. Environ. Microbiol., 6(3), pp. 254–263.Search in Google Scholar

8. MOSCOSO, F. et al. 2012. Assessment of a process to degrade metal working fluids using Pseudomonas stutzeri CECT 930 and indigenous microbial consortia. Chemosphere, vol. 86, pp. 420–426.Search in Google Scholar

9. Treatment and disposal of used metalworking fluids CIMCOOL ® Technical Report No. J/N 00/52. Milacron Mark. Co.| Consum. Prod. Div. | Cincinnati, Ohio 45209, pp. 1–2.Search in Google Scholar

10. HAUS, F., et al. 2001. Primary biodegradability of mineral base oils in relation to their chemical and physical characteristics. Chemosphere, 45(6–7), pp. 983–990.Search in Google Scholar

11. BOYDE, S. 2002. Green lubricants. Environmental benefits and impacts of lubrication. Green Chem., 4(4), pp. 293–307.Search in Google Scholar

12. EKENGREN, R. B. Ö, NIEMINEN, I. Environmentally acceptable metalworking processes, No. A96291. IVL SWEDISH Environ. VTT Res. Inst.Search in Google Scholar

13. Van Der GAST, C., J., et al. 2001. Identification and characterisation of bacterial populations of an in-use metal-working uid by phenotypic and genotypic methodology. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation, vol. 47, pp. 113–123.Search in Google Scholar

14. van der GAST, C., J., et al. 2002. Selection of microbial consortia for treating metal-working fluids. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., vol. 29, pp. 20–27.Search in Google Scholar

15. JAGADEVAN, S., et al. 2011. Harmonisation of chemical and biological process in development of a hybrid technology for treatment of recalcitrant metalworking fluid. Bioresour. Technol., vol. 102, pp. 8783–8789.Search in Google Scholar

16. BIJAN, L., et al. 2005. Integrated ozone and biotreatment of pulp mill effluent and changes in biodegradability and molecular weight distribution of organic compounds. Water Res., vol. 39, pp. 3763–3772.Search in Google Scholar

17. DURÁN-MORENO, et al. 2011. Assessment of Fenton’s reagent and ozonation as pre-treatments for increasing the biodegradability of aqueous diethanolamine solutions from an oil refinery gas sweetening process. J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 186, pp. 1652–1659.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.043Search in Google Scholar

18. OLLER, I., et al. 2011. Combination of Advanced Oxidation Processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination-A review. Sci. Total Environ., vol. 409, pp. 4141–4166.Search in Google Scholar

19. GOGATE, P., R. et al. 2004. A review of imperative technologies for wastewater treatment I: Oxidation technologies at ambient conditions. Adv. Environ. Res., vol. 8, pp. 501–551.Search in Google Scholar

20. MUNTER, R. 2001. Advanced Oxidation Processes - Current Status and Prospect. Proc. Est. Acad. Sci. Chem., 50(2), pp. 59–80.Search in Google Scholar

21. U. Von GUNTEN. 2003. Ozonation of drinking water: Part I. Oxidation kinetics and product formation. Water Res., vol. 37, pp. 1443–1467.Search in Google Scholar

22. RATPUKDI, T., et al. 2010. Mineralization and biodegradability enhancement of natural organic matter by ozone-VUV in comparison with ozone, VUV, ozone-UV, and UV: Effects of pH and ozone dose. Water Res., vol. 44, pp. 3531–3543.10.1016/j.watres.2010.03.034Search in Google Scholar

23. JAGADEVAN, S., et al. 2013. Treatment of waste metalworking fluid by a hybrid ozone-biological process. J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 244–245, pp. 394–402.Search in Google Scholar

24. Mac ADAM, J., et al. 2012. Incorporating biodegradation and advanced oxidation processes in the treatment of spent metalworking fluids. Environ. Technol., 33(24), pp. 2741–2750.Search in Google Scholar

25. NORR, C. 2001. Modification of the Zahn - Wellens test : determination of the biodegradability of poorly soluble, adsorbing and volatile substances by measurement of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production, vol. 44, pp. 553–559.10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00497-5Search in Google Scholar