The role of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring followed by facial nerve stimulation during parotidectomy

1. Ryzenman J.M., Pensak M.L., Tew J.M. Jr - Facial paralysis and surgical rehabilitation: a quality of life analysis in a cohort of 1,595 patients after acoustic neuroma surgery. Otol Neurotol., 2005;26(3):516-521.Search in Google Scholar

2. Brennan J., Moore E.J., Shuler K.J. - Prospective analysis of the efficacy of continuous intraoperative nerve monitoring during thyroidectomy, parathyroidectomy, and parotidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., 2001;124(5):537-543.Search in Google Scholar

3. Amano M., Kohno M., Nagata O., Taniguchi M., Sora S., Sato H. - Intraoperative continuous monitoring of evoked facial nerve electromyograms in acoustic neuroma surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2011;153(5):1059-1067 [discussion 1067].10.1007/s00701-010-0937-621340712Search in Google Scholar

4. Ozturk K., Akyildiz S., Gode S., Turhal G., Gursan G., Kirazli T. - The effect of partial superficial parotidectomy on amplitude, latency and threshold of facial nerve stimulation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol., 2016;273(6):1527-1531. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3622-9. Epub 2015 Apr11.10.1007/s00405-015-3622-925862067Search in Google Scholar

5. Kaye A.D., Davis S.F. - Principles of Neurophysiological Assessment, Mapping, and Monitoring. Springer-Verlag New York, 2014.10.1007/978-1-4614-8942-9Search in Google Scholar

6. Kawaguchi M., Sakamoto T., Inoue S., Kakimoto M., Furuya H., Morimoto T., Sakaki T. - Low dose propofol as a supplement to ketamine-based anesthesia during intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000;25(8):974-979.10.1097/00007632-200004150-0001310767811Search in Google Scholar

7. Nathan N., Tabaraud F., Lacroix F., Moulies D., Viviand X., Lansade A., Terrier G., Feiss P. -Influence of propofol concentrations on multipulse transcranial motor evoked potentials. Br J Anaesth., 2003;91(4):493-497.Search in Google Scholar

8. van Dongen E.P., ter Beek H.T., Aarts L.P., Schepens M.A., Morshuis W.J., Benning F.J., de Boer A., Boezeman E.H. - The effect of two low-dose propofol infusions on the relationship between six-pulse transcranial electrical stimulation and the evoked lower extremity muscle response. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand., 2000;44(7):799-803.Search in Google Scholar

9. Inoue S., Kawaguchi M., Kakimoto M., Sakamoto T., Kitaguchi K., Furuya H., Morimoto T., Sakaki T. - Amplitudes and intrapatient variability of myogenic motor evoked potentials to transcranial electrical stimulation during ketamine/N2O- and propofol/N2O-based anesthesia. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol., 2002;14(3):213-217.Search in Google Scholar

10. Doikov I.Y., Konsulov S.S., Dimov R.S., Deenitchin G.P., Yovchev I.P. - Stimulation electromyography as a method of intraoperative localization and identifi cation of the facial nerve during parotidectomy: review of 15 consecutive parotid surgeries. Folia Med (Plovdiv)., 2001;43(4):23-6.Search in Google Scholar

11. Husain A.M. - A practical approach to neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring [electronic resource]. Demos Medical Publishing, New York, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

12. Holland N.R., Lukaczyk T.A., Riley L.H. 3rd, Kostuik J.P. - Higher electrical stimulus intensities are required to activate chronically compressed nerve roots. Implications for intraoperative electromyographic pedicle screw testing. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1998;23(2):224-227.10.1097/00007632-199801150-000149474730Search in Google Scholar