Open Access

Specific features of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy – case report


Cite

1. Caldwell G.W. - Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct, with preservation of the canaliculi, and with an incidental description of a new lacrimal probe. Am J Ophthalmol., 1893;10:189-193.Search in Google Scholar

2. Tarbet K.J., Custer P.L. - External dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical success, patient satisfaction, and economic cost. Ophthalmology, 1995;102:1065-1070.Search in Google Scholar

3. Yung M.W., Hardman-Lea S. - Analysis of the results of surgical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol., 2002;86(7):792-4.Search in Google Scholar

4. Durvasula V., Gatland D.J. - Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: longterm results and evolution of surgical technique. J Laryngol Otol., 2004;118:628-632.Search in Google Scholar

5. Ducasse A. - Les voies lacrymales. Societe Francaise d’Ophthalmologie, Paris, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

6. Dortzbach R.K., France T.D., Kushner B.J., Gonnering R.S. - Silicone intubation for obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct in children. Am J Ophthalmol., 1982;94:585-90.Search in Google Scholar

7. Ewing A.E. - Roentgen ray demonstration of the lacrimal abscess cavity. Am J Ophthalmol., 1909;24:1.Search in Google Scholar

8. Rossomondo R.M., Carlton W.H., Trueblood J., et al. - A new method of evaluating lacrimal drainage. Arch Ophthalmol., 1972; 88:523-525.Search in Google Scholar

9. Wearne M.J., Pitts J., Frank J., et al. - Comparison of dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Br J Ophthalmo., 1999;83:1032-5.Search in Google Scholar

10. Karim R., Ghabrial R., Lynch T.F., Tang B. - A comparison of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Clinical Ophthalmology, 2011;5:979-989.10.2147/OPTH.S19455314186321792289Search in Google Scholar

11. Shun-Shin G.A., Thurairajan G. - External dacryocystorhinostomy - an end of an era? Br J Ophthalmol., 1997;81:716-717.Search in Google Scholar

12. Gibbs D.C. - New probe for the intubation of lacrimal canaliculi with silicone rubber tubing. Br J Opthalmol., 1967;51(3):1988.10.1136/bjo.51.3.1985063616019817Search in Google Scholar

13. Kakkar V., Chugh J.P., Sachdeva S., et.al. - Dacryocystorhinostomy With And Without Silicon Stent: A Comparative Study. Internet J Otolaryngol., 2008:9:1.10.5580/f5bSearch in Google Scholar

14. Acharya K., Pradhan B., Thapa N. - Comparison of outcome following endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with external dacryocystorhinostomy. Nepalese J ENT Head and Neck Surgery, 2011:2(2):2-3.10.3126/njenthns.v2i2.6791Search in Google Scholar

15. Harvinder S., Rosalind S., Philip R. - Powered Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with Mucosal Flaps Without Stenting. Med J Malaysia, 2008;63(3):237-238.Search in Google Scholar

16. Unlu H.H., Toprak B. - Comparison of surgical outcomes in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicon intubation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol., 2002;111(8)-09.10.1177/00034894021110080912184592Search in Google Scholar

17. Dortzbach R.K., France T.D., Kushner B.J., Gonnering R.S. - Silicone intubation for obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct in children. Am J Ophthalmol., 1982;94:585-90.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2393-3356
Language:
English