[
1. MANNO C, STRIPPOLI GF, ARNESANO L. Predictors of bleeding complications in percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy. Kidney Int 2004; 66:1570-7.10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00922.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. WHITTIER WL, KORBET SM. Timing of complications in percutaneous renal biopsy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15:142-7.10.1097/01.ASN.0000102472.37947.14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. TAKASHI M, TAKAGI Y, SAKATA T, et al., Clinicopathological characteristics of small renal carcinomas. Int Urol Nephrol. 1994; 26:621-629.10.1007/BF02767715
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. CAMPBELL SC, NOVICK AC, HERTS B, et al., Prospective evaluation of fine needle aspiration of small, solid renal masses: accuracy and morbidity. Urology. 1997; 50:25-29.10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00111-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. BRIERLY RD, THOMAS PJ, HARRISON NW, et al., Evaluation of fineneedle aspiration cytology for renal masses. BJU Int. 2000; 85:14-18.10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00417.x10619937
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. HARA I, MIYAKE H, HARA S, et al., Role of percutaneous image-guided biopsy in the evaluation of renal masses. Urol Int. 2001; 67:199-202.10.1159/00005098711598445
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. CAOILI EM, BUDE RO, HIGGINS EJ, et al., Evaluation of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179:373-378.10.2214/ajr.179.2.179037312130435
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. NEUZILLET Y, LECHEVALLIER E, ANDRE M, et al., Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses. J Urol. 2004; 171:1802-1805.10.1097/01.ju.0000120147.51090.2b15076280
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. NYMAN RS, CAPPELEN-SMITH J, BRISMAR J, et al., Yield and complications in ultrasound guided biopsy of abdominal lesions. Comparison of fine needle aspiration biopsy and 1.2-mm needle core biopsy using an automated gun. Acta Radiol 1995; 36:485-90.10.1177/028418519503600435
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. HERGESELL O, FELTEN H, ANDRASSY K, et al., Safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy-retrospective analysis of 1090 consecutive cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13: 975-977.10.1093/ndt/13.4.9759568860
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. MEOLA M, BARSOTTI G, CUPISTI A, et al., Free-hand ultrasound-guided renal biopsy: report of 650 consecutive cases. Nephron 1994; 67: 425-430.10.1159/000188016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. MANNO C, STRIPPOLI GFM, ARNESANO L, et al., Predictors of bleeding complications in percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy. Kidney Int 2004; 66: 1570-1577.10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00922.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. STILES KP, YUAN CM, CHUNG EM, et al., Renal biopsy in high-risk patients with medical diseases of the kidney. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36: 419-433.10.1053/ajkd.2000.8998
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. FINE DM, AREPALLY A, HOFMANN LV, et al., Diagnostic utility and safety of transjugular kidney biopsy in the obese patient. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 1798-180210.1093/ndt/gfh246
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. CRISTALLINI EG, PAGANELLI C, BOLIS GB. Role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the assessment of renal masses. Diagn Cytopathol. 1991; 7:32-35.10.1002/dc.2840070110
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. JUUL N, TORP-PETERSON S, GRONVALL F, et al., Ultrasonically guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of renal masses. J Urol. 1985; 133:579-581.10.1016/S0022-5347(17)49096-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. CONSTANTIN A, BRISSON ML, KWAN J, PROULX F. Percutaneous US-guided Renal Biopsy: A Retrospective Study Comparing the 16-gauge End-cut and 14-gauge Side-notch Needles. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21:357-361.10.1016/j.jvir.2009.11.00520133155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. YESUDAS SS, GEORGY NK, MANICKAM S, et al., Percutaneous real-time ultrasound-guided renal biopsy performed solely by nephrologists: A case series. Indian J Nephrol. 2010; 20(3):137-41.10.4103/0971-4065.70844296697921072153
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. MUKHTAR KN, MAHMOOD SN, UMAIR SF. CT guided percutaneous renal biopsy versus ultrasound guided for obtaining adequate tissue. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012; 62(9)_ 880-882.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. KUMAR A, MITCHELL MJ, AGGARWAL S, FRASER DB, TRILLO AA. Ultrasonography-directed native renal biopsy: comparison of an automated biopsy device with a needle system. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1992; 43(5):359-63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. CHISHTI I, BURHAN D, HAIDER Z, SAJJAD Z. Renal biopsy: ultrasound guided renal biopsy using a caudal angulated needle path to improve cortical sampling. Pakistan journal of radiology. 2008; 18(3): 74-76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. SKALOVA S, REJTAR P. Safety profile of paediatric percutaneous ultrasonography-guided renal biopsies. Singapore Med J 2010; 51(6): 481-483.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. CORAPI KM, CHEN JL, BALK EM, GORDON CE. Bleeding complications of native kidney biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012; 60(1):62-73.10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.02.33022537423
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. MAYA ID, MADDELA P, BARKER J, ALLON M. Percutaneous Renal Biopsy: Comparison of Blind and Real-Time Ultrasound-Guided Technique. Seminars in Dialysis. 2007; 20(4): 355-358.10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00295.x17635829
]Search in Google Scholar
