Open Access

Characteristics of the innovation activities of firms in Europe: a critical review of international differences

   | Sep 23, 2017

Cite

ANDERSSON, M., JOHANSSON, B., KARLSSON, C. & LÖÖF, H. (2012). Innovation and Growth: From R&D Strategies of Innovating Firms to Economy-wide Technological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646685.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

ARROW, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: R. R. Nelson (ed.). The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 609–626.10.1515/9781400879762-024Search in Google Scholar

BAREGHEH, A., ROWLEY, J. & SAMBROOK, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision. 47 (8). pp.1323–1339. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1108/0025174091098457810.1108/00251740910984578Search in Google Scholar

BROZEN, Y. (1951). Invention, Innovation, and Imitation. The American Economic Review, 41(2), 239–257.Search in Google Scholar

CASTELLACCI, F. (2011). How does competition affect the relationship between innovation and productivity? Estimation of a CDM model for Norway. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20(7), 637-658.10.1080/10438599.2010.516535Search in Google Scholar

CLASSEN, N., CARREE, M., Van GILS, A., & PETERS, B. (2014). Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics, 42 (3), pp. 595-609. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9490-z10.1007/s11187-013-9490-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

COHEN, W.M., NELSON, R.R. & WALSH, J.P. (2000). Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). [Online]. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w7552. [Accessed: 9 July 2012].Search in Google Scholar

CRÉPON, B., DUGUET, E., & MAIRESSEC, J. (1998). Research, Innovation And Productivi [Ty: An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and new Technology, 7(2), 115-158.10.1080/10438599800000031Search in Google Scholar

DAMIJAN, J. P., KOSTEVC, Č., & ROJEC, M. (2011). Innovation and firms’ productivity growth in Slovenia: Sensitivity of results to sectoral heterogeneity and to estimation method (pp. 165-193). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

DAVID, P.A., HALL, B.H. & TOOLE, A.A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy. 29 (4–5). pp.497–529. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-610.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

DORAN, J., & O'LEARY, E. (2011). External interaction, innovation and productivity: an application of the innovation value chain to Ireland. Spatial Economic Analysis, 6 (2), pp. 199-222. http://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2011.55777710.1080/17421772.2011.557777Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

EBERSBERGER, B. & Lööf, H. (2005). Innovation Behaviour and Productivity Performance in the Nordic Region Does Foreign Ownership Matter? [Online]. Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies. Available from: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/hhscesisp/0027.htm. [Accessed: 27 March 2012].Search in Google Scholar

EFRON, B. (1979). Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. The Annals of Statistics. 7 (1). pp.1–26. http://doi.org/10.1214/aos/117634455210.1214/aos/1176344552Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ETTLIE, J.E. & ROSENTHAL, S.R. (2011). Service versus Manufacturing Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 28 (2). pp.285–299. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00797.x10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00797.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

FASSIO, C. (2015). How Similar is Innovation in German, Italian and Spanish Medium-Technology Sectors? Implications for the Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Distance-to-the-Frontier Perspectives. Industry and Innovation, 22 (2), pp. 102-125. http://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2015.103316010.1080/13662716.2015.1033160Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

GILBERT, R.J. (2006). Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition--Innovation Debate? Innovation Policy and the Economy. 6. pp.159–215.10.1086/ipe.6.25056183Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

GOULD, W. (1995). Jackknife estimation. Stata Technical Bulletin. 4 (24). pp.25–29.Search in Google Scholar

GREENHALGH, C. & ROGERS, M. (2009). Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth. Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

GRIFFITH, R., HUERGO, E., MAIRESSE, J., & PETERS, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford review of economic policy, 22 (4), 483-498. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj02810.1093/oxrep/grj028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

GRILICHES, Z. (1964). Research Expenditures, Education, and the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function. The American Economic Review. 54 (6). pp.961–974.Search in Google Scholar

HALL, B. H., LOTTI, F., & MAIRESSE, J. (2009). Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, 33 (1), pp. 13-33. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9184-810.1007/s11187-009-9184-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

HALL, B.H. & MAIRESSE, J. (2006). Empirical Studies of Innovation in the Knowledge Driven Economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (4/5), 289–299. http://doi.org/10.1080/1043859050051276010.1080/10438590500512760Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

HALL, B.H. & Rosenberg, N. (2010). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation Set. Berkeley: Elsevier Science.Search in Google Scholar

HALPERN, L., & MURAKÖZY, B. (2012). Innovation, productivity and exports: the case of Hungary. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21 (2), 151-173. http://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2011.56199510.1080/10438599.2011.561995Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

HASHI, I., & STOJČIĆ, N. (2013). The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4. Research Policy, 42(2), 353–366. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.01110.1016/j.respol.2012.09.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

HECKMAN, J.J. (1976). The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement. 5 (4). pp.475–492.Search in Google Scholar

JANZ, N., LÖÖF, H. & PETERS, B. (2004). Firm Level Innovation and Productivity - Is There a Common Story Across Countries? Problems and Perspectives in Management. Vol. 2. pp.184–204.Search in Google Scholar

KUZNETS, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review. 45 (1). pp.1–28.Search in Google Scholar

LEVIN, R.C., KLEVORICK, A.K., NELSON, R.R., WINTER, S.G., GILBERT, R. & GRILICHES, Z. (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1987 (3). pp.783–831. http://doi.org/10.2307/253445410.2307/2534454Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LOKSHIN, B. & MOHNEN, P. (2010). How effective are level-based R&D tax credits? Evidence from the Netherlands. [Online]. United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology. Available from: http://ideas.repec.org/p/dgr/unumer/2010040.html. [Accessed: 5 April 2012].Search in Google Scholar

LÖÖF, H. & Heshmati, A. (2006). On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 15 (4–5). pp.317–344. http://doi.org/10.1080/1043859050051281010.1080/10438590500512810Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

MAIRESSE, J. & MOHNEN, P. (2002). Accounting for Innovation and Measuring Innovativeness: An Illustrative Framework and an Application. The American Economic Review. 92 (2). pp.226–230. http://doi.org/10.1257/00028280232018930210.1257/000282802320189302Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

MAIRESSE, J. & MOHNEN, P. (2010). Chapter 26 - Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis. In: B. H. H. and N. ROSENBERG (ed.). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Volume 2. [Online]. North-Holland, pp. 1129–1155. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169721810020101. [Accessed: 1 June 2016].10.3386/w15857Search in Google Scholar

MANSFIELD, E. (1964). Industrial Research and Development Expenditures: Determinants, Prospects, and Relation to Size of Firm and Inventive Output. The Journal of Political Economy. 72 (4). pp.319–340.10.1086/258914Search in Google Scholar

MANSFIELD, E. (1965). Rates of Return from Industrial Research and Development. The American Economic Review. 55 (1/2). pp.310–322.Search in Google Scholar

MANSFIELD, E. (1963). Size of Firm, Market Structure, and Innovation. The Journal of Political Economy. 71 (6). pp.556–576. http://doi.org/10.1086/25881510.1086/258815Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

MASSO, J. & VAHTER, P. (2008). Technological innovation and productivity in late-transition Estonia: econometric evidence from innovation surveys. The European Journal of Development Research. 20 (2). pp.240–261. http://doi.org/10.1080/0957881080206075110.1080/09578810802060751Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). Oslo Manual. [Online]. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecdilibrary.org/content/book/9789264013100-en. [Accessed: 26 March 2016]Search in Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2009). Innovation in Firms: A Microeconomic Perspective. [Online]. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/innovation-in-firms_9789264056213-en. [Accessed: 26 March 2017]Search in Google Scholar

POLDER, M., LEEUWEN, G. van, MOHNEN, P. & RAYMOND, W. (2009). Productivity effects of innovation modes. [Online]. University Library of Munich, Germany. Available from: http://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/18893.html. [Accessed: 26 March 2016].Search in Google Scholar

RAFFO, J., LHUILLERY, S., & MIOTTI, L. (2008). Northern and southern innovativity: a comparison across European and Latin American countries. The European Journal of Development Research, 20 (2), pp. 219-239. http://doi.org/10.1080/0957881080206077710.1080/09578810802060777Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

RAYMOND, W., MAIRESSE, J., MOHNEN, P., & PALM, F. (2015). Dynamic models of R & D, innovation and productivity: Panel data evidence for Dutch and French manufacturing. European Economic Review, 78, pp. 285-306. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.00210.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

RAYMOND, W., MOHNEN, P., PALM, F., & van der LOEFF, S. S. (2006). A classification of Dutch manufacturing based on a model of innovation. De Economist, 154 (1), pp. 85-105. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-006-0005-z10.1007/s10645-006-0005-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

ROUD, V., (2007). Firm-level research on innovation and productivity: Russian experience. In: Proceeding from the Conference on Micro Evidence on Innovation in Developing Countries (MEIDE). Maastricht. Available from: [Accessed: 4 March 2016].Search in Google Scholar

SCHMOOKLER, J. (1959). Bigness, Fewness, and Research. Journal of Political Economy. 67 (6). pp.628–632. http://doi.org/10.1086/25825110.1086/258251Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

SCHUMPETER, J. (1934). The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

SOLOW, R. (1964). Capital, Labor, and Income in Manufacturing. In: The Behavior Of Income Shares: Selected Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Studies in income and wealth. [Online]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 101–142. Available from: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c1844. [Accessed: 29 March 2016].Search in Google Scholar

Van BEVEREN, I. (2012). Total Factor Productivity Estimation: A Practical Review. Journal of Economic Surveys. 26 (1). pp.98–128. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00631.x10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00631.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

VILLARD, H. H., (1958). Competition, Oligopoly, and Research. Journal of Political Economy, 66(6), 483–497. http://doi.org/10.1086/25810110.1086/258101Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

VOCHOZKA, M., STRAKOVÁ, J., & VÁCHAL, J., (2015). Model to Predict Survival of Transportation and Shipping Companies. Naše more. 62 (SI). pp.109–113.10.17818/NM/2015/SI4Search in Google Scholar

VOKOUN, M., (2014). R&D and Innovation Activities, Search for Better Definitions and an Economic-Historical Approach. In Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences (No. 0402131). International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

VOKOUN, M., (2016). Innovation behaviour of firms in a small open economy: the case of the Czech manufacturing industry. Empirica. 43 (1). pp.111–139. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-015-9296-010.1007/s10663-015-9296-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ZELLNER, A., & THEIL, H., (1962). Three-Stage Least Squares: Simultaneous Estimation of Simultaneous Equations. Econometrica. 30 (1). pp.54–78. http://doi.org/10.2307/191128710.2307/1911287Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1804-1663
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Business and Economics, Political Economics, Economic Theory, Systems and Structures