[Armstrong, R. A. (2019). Should Pearson’s correlation coefficient be avoided? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics I, 39, 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12636 PMID:3142362410.1111/opo.12636]Search in Google Scholar
[Babatunde, I. O. (2018). Examining Heuristics for Building – Work-In-Progress Valuations in Niger State Nigeria. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 26(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2018-001910.2478/remav-2018-0019]Search in Google Scholar
[Barańska, A. M. (2019a). Correlation Analysis in the Process Of Weighting Real Property Attributes. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 27(4), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2019-003710.2478/remav-2019-0037]Search in Google Scholar
[Barańska, A. M. (2019b). Linear and Nonlinear Weighing of Property Features. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 27(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2019-000610.2478/remav-2019-0006]Search in Google Scholar
[Dmytrów, K., Gdakowicz, A., & Putek-Szeląg, E. (2019). Statistical Relations of the Qualitative Attributes of Real Properties Subject oo Mass Appraisal. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 19(2), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2019-001110.2478/foli-2019-0011]Search in Google Scholar
[Doszyń, M. (2017). Statistical Determination of Impact of Property Attributes for Weak Measurement Scales. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 25(4), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/remav-2017-003110.1515/remav-2017-0031]Search in Google Scholar
[Doszyń, M. (2019). Individual Capacities of Hellwig’s Information Carriers and the Impact of Attributes in the Szczecin Algorithm of Real Estate Mass Appraisal. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 27(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2019-000210.2478/remav-2019-0002]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaca, R., & Sawiłow, E. (2014). Zastosowanie współczynników korelacji rang Spearmana do ustalenia wag cech rynkowych nieruchomości, Rzeczoznawca Majątkowy, nr 82, pp. 24-30 (Application of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient for establishing ranks of real estate characteristics. Real Estate Appraiser, (82), 24–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1963). Measures of association for cross classification. III: Approximate sampling theory. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 310–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.1050085010.1080/01621459.1963.10500850]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaca, R. (2018). Parametric and Non-Parametric Statistical Methods in the Assessment of the Effect of Property Attributes on Prices. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 26(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2018-001810.2478/remav-2018-0018]Search in Google Scholar
[Foryś, I., & Gaca, R. (2016). Application of the Likert and Osgood Scales to Quantify the Qualitative Features of Real Estate Properties. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 16(2), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/foli-2016-002110.1515/foli-2016-0021]Search in Google Scholar
[Foryś, I., & Gdakowicz, A. (2004). Wykorzystanie metod ilościowych do badania rynku nieruchomości (The application of quantitative methods for real estate market analysis). Studia i Materiały Towarzystwa Naukowego Nieruchomości, 12(1).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hozer, J., Foryś, I., Zwolankowska, M., Kokot, S., & Kuźmiński, W. (1999). Ekonometryczny algorytm masowej wyceny nieruchomości gruntowych (An Econometric Algorithm for Land Mass Appraisal). Katedra Ekonometrii i Statystyki Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Stowarzyszenie Pomoc i Rozwój.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hozer, J., Gnat, S., Kokot, S., & Kuźmiński, W. (2019). The Problem of Designating Elementary Terrains for the Purpose of Szczecin Algorithm of Real Estate Mass Appraisal. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 27(3), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2019-002410.2478/remav-2019-0024]Search in Google Scholar
[Kendall, M. G. (1948). Rank Correlation Methods. Charles Griffin & Company Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006 PMID:2149651310.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Powszechne Krajowe Zasady Wyceny. (2008). Nota Interpretacyjna, Zastosowanie podejścia porównawczego w wycenie nieruchomości (Common National Valuation Rules, Interpretative Note, Application of the Comparative Approach to Property Valuation), Polska Federacja Stowarzyszeń Rzeczoznawców Majątkowych. http://wycena.net.pl/standardy/NIZastosowanie.podejscia.porownawczego.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1988). Nonparametrics statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Doszyń, M. (Ed.). (2020). System kalibracji macierzy wpływu atrybutów w szczecińskim algorytmie masowej wyceny nieruchomości (Calibration system of attribute impact matrix in Szczecin algorithm of real estate mass appraisal). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walesiak, M. (2016). Uogólniona miara odległości GDM w statystycznej analizie wielowymiarowej z wykorzystaniem programu R. Wydanie drugie poprawione i rozszerzone (A General Dissimilarity Measure in Multi-variate Statistical Analysis with Application of R Program. Second revised and extended edition). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego.]Search in Google Scholar