<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p> Studies investigating the relation between risk and return occupy an important place in the discussion about the effectiveness of investing in real estate. A review of the available studies shows that real estate investments are less profitable than stocks, but in terms of risk and return, are usually the best option. This worldwide regularity may not necessarily be presented in Poland, as the Polish market is not fully fledged yet. The analysis presented in this article was performed with a view to reducing a research gap resulting from the lack of comprehensive Polish studies in this field. In the article, data spanning the years from 2006 to 2016 are examined by means of descriptive statistics, measures of risk, and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine which of the following investment vehicles - bonds, real estate or stocks - offer the best risk-return ratio. The article has two parts. The analytical part is a review of studies on risk measurement methods and of earlier studies investigating risk and return by a class of assets (particularly real estate). In the empirical part, assets are compared with the use of statistical methods. The results of the risk-return analysis point to the money market as the best option for investors. Stocks and real estate ranked second and third, respectively.</p></abstract>

Studies investigating the relation between risk and return occupy an important place in the discussion about the effectiveness of investing in real estate. A review of the available studies shows that real estate investments are less profitable than stocks, but in terms of risk and return, are usually the best option. This worldwide regularity may not necessarily be presented in Poland, as the Polish market is not fully fledged yet. The analysis presented in this article was performed with a view to reducing a research gap resulting from the lack of comprehensive Polish studies in this field. In the article, data spanning the years from 2006 to 2016 are examined by means of descriptive statistics, measures of risk, and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine which of the following investment vehicles - bonds, real estate or stocks - offer the best risk-return ratio. The article has two parts. The analytical part is a review of studies on risk measurement methods and of earlier studies investigating risk and return by a class of assets (particularly real estate). In the empirical part, assets are compared with the use of statistical methods. The results of the risk-return analysis point to the money market as the best option for investors. Stocks and real estate ranked second and third, respectively.

RISK AND RETURN IN THE REAL ESTATE, BOND AND STOCK MARKETS

Real Estate Management and Valuation

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

{"article-title":"RISK AND RETURN IN THE REAL ESTATE, BOND AND STOCK MARKETS"}

Studies investigating the relation between risk and return occupy an important place in the discussion about the effectiveness of investing in real estate. A...

RISK AND RETURN IN THE REAL ESTATE, BOND AND STOCK MARKETS

Published Online: Oct 21, 2017

Page range: 15 - 22

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/remav-2017-0018

Keywords
risk, real estate market, standard deviation, semi-standard deviation

© 2017

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

RISK AND RETURN IN THE REAL ESTATE, BOND AND STOCK MARKETS

Published Online: Oct 21, 2017

Page range: 15 - 22

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/remav-2017-0018

Keywordsrisk, real estate market, standard deviation, semi-standard deviation

© 2017

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Keywords
risk, real estate market, standard deviation, semi-standard deviation