Social robotics to help children with autism in their interactions through imitation

Ackermann, E. (2002). Ambienti di gioco programmabili: cos’è possibile per un bambino di quattro anni. TD-Tecnologie Didattiche, 27, 48-55.Search in Google Scholar

Ansuini, C., Cavallo, A., Bertone, C. & Becchio, C. (2015). Intentions in the Brain: The Unveiling of Mister Hyde. The Neuroscientist 21(2), 126–135. DOI: 10.1177/107385841453382710.1177/1073858414533827Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Battegazzorre, P. (2009). Bee-bot, fare robotica con un giocattolo programmabile a banalità limitata. Atti Didamatica: Retrieved from http://www.itctannoia.it/Didamatica/2009/lavori/battegazzore.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness, An essay on blindness and theory of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Benitez, A., Cala A. (2007). Market research. Report del progetto IROMEC. www.iromec.orgSearch in Google Scholar

Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 167-175.10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00373-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Caci, B. (2004). Laboratorio di robotica: una palestra per la mente. Proceeding del Congresso Nazionale dell’Associazione Italiana di Psicologia (AIP), Sezione di Psicologia Sperimentale, Sciacca.Search in Google Scholar

Cardaci, M., Caci, B.& D’Amico, A. (2004). La robotica nella riabilitazione di soggetti autistici e con deficit cognitivi. Proceedings of the conference “Tecnologie Digitali e l’Intelligenza Artificiale al Servizio dei Disabili”. Italy: University of Palermo.Search in Google Scholar

Cavallo, A., Koul, A., Ansuini, C., Capozzi, F. & Becchio, C. (2016). Decoding intentions from movement kinematics. Scientific Reports, 6:37036. DOI: 10.1038/srep3703610.1038/srep37036Search in Google Scholar

Conti, D., Di Nuovo, S., Buono, S., Trubia, G. & Di Nuovo, A. (2015). Use of robotics to stimulate imitation in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A pilot study in a clinical setting. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Kobe. Japan.10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333589Search in Google Scholar

Cook, A.M. & Polgar, J.M. (2008). Cook & Hussey’s Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, A.M, Adams, K., Volden, J., Harbottle, N. & Harbottle, C. (2011). Using Lego robots to estimate cognitive ability in children who have severe physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6 (4), 338-346.10.3109/17483107.2010.534231Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

D’Ambrosio, M. Mirabile, Miglino, O. (2003). Uno studio pilota sull’impiego di giocattoli robotici nella riabilitazione cognitiva. Proceedings of the National Congress of the Italian Psychology Association (AIP). Bari, Italy.Search in Google Scholar

Dautenhahn, K., Werry, I., Ogden, B. & Harwin, W. (2001). Can Social Interaction Skills Be Taught by a Social Agent? The Role of a Robotic Mediator. Autism Therapy, Proceedings CT, The Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Technology: Instruments of Mind (CT2001). University of Warwick, United Kingdom, Springer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Dautenhahn, K. & Robins, B. (2007). Learning and Interaction in Children with Autism. VI IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning, London, United Kingdom, July 11-13.Search in Google Scholar

Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C., Walters, M., Robins, B., Kose-Bagci, H., Mirza, A. & Blow, M. (2009). KASPAR - A Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot for Human-Robot Interaction Research, to appear. Special Issue on “Humanoid Robots” for Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 6, 3–4, 369–397.10.1155/2009/708594Search in Google Scholar

De Graaf, M.M.A. & Ben Allouch, S. (2013). Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Rob. Auton. Syst., 61, 1476–148610.1016/j.robot.2013.07.007Search in Google Scholar

Di Nuovo, S., De La Cruz, V., Conti, D., Buono, S., Di Nuovo, A. (2014). Mental Imagery: rehabilitation through simulation. Life Span and Disability 17, 1, 89-118Search in Google Scholar

Duquette, A., Michaud, F. & Mercier, H. (2008). Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism. Auton. Robots, 24, 147–15710.1007/s10514-007-9056-5Search in Google Scholar

Erwin, B. (2001). Creative Projects with LEGO Mindstorms. Boston: Addison-Wesley Pub Co.Search in Google Scholar

Feil-Seifer, D. & Matarić, M.J. (2005). Defining Socially Assistive Robotics. Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2005, 465-468.Search in Google Scholar

Feil-Seifer, D. & Matarić M.J. (2009). Toward Socially Assistive Robotics for Augmenting Interventions for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 54, 201-210.10.1007/978-3-642-00196-3_24Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I. & Dautenhahn K. (2003). A Survey of Socially Iteractive Robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42 (3-4), pp. 143-166.10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Garbati, M. (2012). Robotica: sempre più presente nella nostra vita. Retrieved from http://www.torinoscienza.it/dossier/robotica_sempre_piu_presente_nella_nostra_vita_22645.html 30/05/2014.Search in Google Scholar

Goodrich, M., Colton, M., Brinton, B. & Fujiki, M. (2011). A case for lowdose robotics in autism therapy. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human/Robot Interaction, 143-144.10.1145/1957656.1957702Search in Google Scholar

Gouaillier, D., Hugel, V., Blazevic, P., Kilner, C., Monceaux, J., Lafourcade, P., Marnier, B., Serre, J.& Maisonnier, B. (2009). Mechatronic design of NAO humanoid. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2124-212910.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152516Search in Google Scholar

Harel I. &Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Search in Google Scholar

IROMEC Consortium, Deliverable 1.0. User needs report, www.iromec.orgSearch in Google Scholar

Johnson, M.H. & Morton, J. (1991). Biology and Cognitive Development: The case of face recognition. Blackwell: Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, K.J., Park, E. & Shyam Sundar, S. (2013). Caregiving role in human-robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence. Computer Human Behavior 29, 1799–1806.10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.009Search in Google Scholar

Kulk, J. & Welsh, J. (2008). A Low Power Walk for the NAO Robot. Retrieved from http://www.araa.asn.au/acra/acra2008/papers/pap117s1.pdf?origin=publication_detail 10.03. 20172014Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, H., Marti, P. & Robins, B. (2011). Robots as social mediators for children with Autism - A preliminary analysis comparing two different robotic platforms. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) and the International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics (EpiRob), Frankfurt, Germany, 24-27 August.Search in Google Scholar

Leroux, P. (1999). Educational Robotics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, pp. 1080-1089.Search in Google Scholar

Marti, P. (2005). L’interazione Uomo-Robot. Ergonomia 2, 50-57.Search in Google Scholar

Marti, P. & Giusti, L. (2009). A robot Companion for Inclusive Games: a user-centred design perspective. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, 3-8 maggio.Search in Google Scholar

Norman, D.A. (1994). How Might People Interact with Agents. Communications of the ACM 37 (7), July 1994, 68-71.10.1145/176789.176796Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computer, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Papert, S. (1993). The Children’s Machine. Rethinking school in the age of computer. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Pearson, Y. & Borenstein, J. (2013). The Intervention of Robot Caregivers and the Cultivation of Children’s Capability to Play. Science and Engineering Ethics. 19 (1), 123-137.10.1007/s11948-011-9309-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1966). La Psychologie de l’enfant. Paris: PUF.Search in Google Scholar

Rabbitt, S.M, Kazdin, A.L & Scassellati, B. (2014). Integrating Socially Assistive Robotics into Mental Healthcare Interventions: Applications and Recommendations for Expanded Use. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Feb;35:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.07.00110.1016/j.cpr.2014.07.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rakison, D.H. & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2001). The developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 209-228.10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.209Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Robins, B. & Dautenhahn, K. (2014), Tactile Interactions with a Humanoid Robot: Novel Play Scenario Implementations with Children with Autism. International Journal of Social Robotics. Retrieved from http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/578/art%253A10.1007%252Fs12369-014-0228-0.pdf?auth66=1404289696_ff11915700c75528370176e76e39777f&ext=.pdf 12.03.201710.1007/s12369-014-0228-0Search in Google Scholar

Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K. & Dickerson, P. (2009). From isolation to communication: a case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot, Procs of 2nd Int Conf on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction: ACHI'09. vol. 2009, IEEE, 205-211. DOI: 10.1109/ACHI.2009.3210.1109/ACHI.2009.32Search in Google Scholar

Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Te Boekhorst, R. & Billard, A. (2005). Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills?, Univers. Access Inf. Soc., 4, 2, 105–12010.1007/s10209-005-0116-3Search in Google Scholar

Scassellati, B., Admoni, H. & Matarić, M. (2012). Robot for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14, 275-294.10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150036Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Scholl, B.J. &Tremoulet, P.D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Cognitive Science, 4, pp 22-28.10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0Search in Google Scholar

Shibata, T., Wada, K., Saito, T. & Tanie K. (2001). Mental Commit Robot and its Application to Therapy of Children. Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference On AIM 01, Como, Italy.10.1109/AIM.2001.936838Search in Google Scholar

Smith, L.B. & Heise, D. (1992). Perceptual similarity and conceptual structure. In Burn, B. Percepts, concepts and categories. Ed. Elseiver.10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61009-2Search in Google Scholar

Strollo, M.R. (2008). Scienze cognitive e aperture pedagogiche. Nuovi orizzonti nella formazione degli insegnanti, Franco Angeli, Milano.Search in Google Scholar

Tapus, A., Matarić, M.J.& Scassellati, B. (2007). Socially assistive robotics. Grand Challenges of Robotics, IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag.,14Search in Google Scholar

Villano M., Crowell C.R., Wier K., Tang K., Thomas B., Shea N., … Diehl J.J. (2011), DOMER: A Wizard of Oz interface for using interactive robots to scaffold social skills for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Human-Robot Interaction, 279-280.10.1145/1957656.1957770Search in Google Scholar