Dynamic CT angiography for cyberknife radiosurgery planning of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a technical/ feasibility report

1. Fleetw ood IG, Steinberg GK. Arteriovenous malformations. Lancet 2002; 359: 863-73.10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07946-1Search in Google Scholar

2. Brown RD Jr., Wiebers DO, Forbes GS. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations: frequency of intracranial hemorrhage and relationship of lesions. J Neurosurg 1990; 73: 859-63.10.3171/jns.1990.73.6.08592230969Search in Google Scholar

3. Ondra SL, Troupp H, George ED, Schwab K. The natural history of symptomatic arteriovenous malformations of the brain: a 24-year follow-up assessment. J Neurosurg 1990; 73: 387-91.10.3171/jns.1990.73.3.03872384776Search in Google Scholar

4. van Be ijnum J, van der Worp HB, Buis DR, Al-Shahi Salman R, Kappelle LJ, Rinkel GJ, et al. Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011; 306: 2011-9.10.1001/jama.2011.163222068993Search in Google Scholar

5. Kano H , Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Yang HC, Flannery TJ, Niranjan A, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations, Part 4: management of basal ganglia and thalamus arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2012; 116: 33-43.10.3171/2011.9.JNS1117522077451Search in Google Scholar

6. Kano H , Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Yang HC, Flannery TJ, Niranjan A, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations, Part 5: management of brainstem arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2012; 116: 44-53.10.3171/2011.9.JNS1117622077450Search in Google Scholar

7. Kano H , Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC, Yang HC, Flannery TJ, Awan NR, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations, Part 1: management of Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2012; 116: 11-20.10.3171/2011.9.JNS10174022077452Search in Google Scholar

8. Ellis TL, Friedman WA, Bova FJ, Kubilis PS, Buatti JM. Analysis of treatment failure after radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1998; 89: 104-10.10.3171/jns.1998.89.1.01049647180Search in Google Scholar

9. Polloc k BE, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, Maitz A, Kondziolka D. Factors associated with successful arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 1998; 42: 1239-44; Discussion 44-7.10.1097/00006123-199806000-000209632181Search in Google Scholar

10. Matsum oto M, Kodama N, Endo Y, Sakuma J, Suzuki K, Sasaki T, et al. Dynamic 3D-CT angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 299-304.Search in Google Scholar

11. Willem s PW, Taeshineetanakul P, Schenk B, Brouwer PA, Terbrugge KG, Krings T. The use of 4D-CTA in the diagnostic work-up of brain arteriovenous malformations. Neuroradiology 2012; 54: 123-31.10.1007/s00234-011-0864-0326139821465177Search in Google Scholar

12. Timmer man RD. An overview of hypofractionation and introduction to this issue of seminars in radiation oncology. Semin Radiat Oncol 2008; 18: 215-22.10.1016/j.semradonc.2008.04.001Search in Google Scholar

13. Buis D R, Lagerwaard FJ, Barkhof F, Dirven CM, Lycklama GJ, Meijer OW, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain AVMs: role of interobserver variation in target definition on digital subtraction angiography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62: 246-52.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.080Search in Google Scholar

14. Veerav agu A, Hansasuta A, Jiang B, Karim AS, Gibbs IC, Chang SD. Volumetric analysis of intracranial arteriovenous malformations contoured for CyberKnife radiosurgery with 3-dimensional rotational angiography vs computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 2013; 73: 262-70. 10.1227/01.neu.0000430285.00928.30Search in Google Scholar

15. Zhang XQ, Shirato H, Aoyama H, Ushikoshi S, Nishioka T, Zhang DZ, et al. Clinical significance of 3D reconstruction of arteriovenous malformation using digital subtraction angiography and its modification with CT information in stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 57: 1392-9.10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00780-6Search in Google Scholar

16. Colomb o F, Cavedon C, Casentini L, Francescon P, Causin F, Pinna V. Early results of CyberKnife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2009; 111: 807-19.10.3171/2008.10.JNS08749Search in Google Scholar

17. Wowra B, Muacevic A, Tonn JC, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M, Herrmann KA. Obliteration dynamics in cerebral arteriovenous malformations after cyberknife radiosurgery: quantification with sequential nidus volumetry and 3-tesla 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Neurosurgery 2009; 64: A102-9.10.1227/01.NEU.0000339201.31176.C9Search in Google Scholar

18. Bednar z G, Downes B, Werner-Wasik M, Rosenwasser RH. Combining stereotactic angiography and 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in treatment planning for arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 46: 1149-54.10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00530-1Search in Google Scholar

19. Gauvri t JY, Oppenheim C, Nataf F, Naggara O, Trystram D, Munier T, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of radiosurgically treated cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 583-91.10.1007/s00330-005-0011-616220210Search in Google Scholar

20. Zacest AC, Caon J, Roos DE, Potter AE, Sullivan T. LINAC radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a single centre prospective analysis and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 21: 241-5.10.1016/j.jocn.2013.03.04024148692Search in Google Scholar

21. Blamek S, Tarnawski R, Miszczyk L. Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2011; 23: 525-31.10.1016/j.clon.2011.03.01221501954Search in Google Scholar

22. Yen CP , Khaled MA, Schwyzer L, Vorsic M, Dumont AS, Steiner L. Early draining vein occlusion after gamma knife surgery for arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 2010; 67: 1293-302; discussion 302. 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f2b39620871437Search in Google Scholar