[Adeli Z., Khorshiddoustb A., 2011. Application of geomorphology in urban planning: Case study in landfill site selection. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 19: 662–667, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.18310.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.183]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Baud D., Reynard E., 2015. Géohistoire d’une trajectoire paysagère dans la plaine du Rhône valaisan. Analyse du secteur entre Riddes et Martigny (1840-1965) (Geohistory of landscape trajectory in the Rhone River plain. Analysis of the sector Riddes-Martigny (1840–1965)). Norois 237: 15–31.10.4000/norois.5761]Search in Google Scholar
[Bethemont J., Bravard J.P., 2016. Pour saluer le Rhône (To greet the Rhone River). Libel, Lyon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Billi A., De Filippis L., Poncia P.P., Sella P., Faccenna C., 2016. Hidden sinkholes and karst cavities in the travertine plateau of a highly-populated geothermal seismic territory (Tivoli, central Italy). Geomorphology 255: 63–80, doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.12.01110.1016/j.geomorph.2015.12.011]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Boivin P., Thouret J.C., 2014. The volcanic Chaîne des Puys: A unique collection of simple and compound monogenetic edifices. In: Fort M., André M.F. (eds), Landscapes and Landforms of France. Springer, Dordrecht: 81–91, doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7022-5_910.1007/978-94-007-7022-5_9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bondesan A., 2017. Geomorphological processes and landscape evolution of the Lagoon of Venice. In: Soldati M., Marchetti M. (eds), Landscapes and Landforms of Italy. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland: 181–191, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_1510.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_15]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Borghi A., d’Atri A., Martire L., Castelli D., Costa E., Dino G., Favero Longo S.E., Ferrando S., Gallo L.M., Giardino M., Groppo C., Piervittori R., Rolfo F., Rossetti P., Vaggelli G., 2014. Fragments of the Western Alpine chain as historic ornamental stones in Turin (Italy): enhancement of urban geological heritage through geotourism. Geoheritage 6: 41–55, doi: 10.1007/s12371-013-0091-7.10.1007/s12371-013-0091-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bravard J.P., 1997. Tectonique et dynamique fluviale du Würm à l’Holocène à la confluence Saône-Rhône (France) (Tectonics and fluvial dynamics from Würm to Holocene at the confluence Saône River – Rhone River, France). Géographie physique et Quaternaire 51(3): 315–326.10.7202/033130ar]Search in Google Scholar
[Brilha J., 2016. Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage 8(2): 119–134.10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown A.G., Tooth S., Bullard J.E., Thomas D.S.G., Chiverrell R.C., Plater A.J., Murton J., Thorndycraft V.R., Tarolli P., Rose J., Wainwright J., Downs P., Aalto R., 2017. The geomorphology of the Anthropocene: emergence, status and implications. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 42: 71–90, doi: 10.1002/esp.394310.1002/esp.3943]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cayla N., 2014. An overview of new technologies applied to the management of geoheritage. Geoheritage 6: 91-102. doi: 10.1007/s12371-014-0113-010.1007/s12371-014-0113-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chin A., 2006. Urban transformation of river landscapes in a global context. Geomorphology 79: 460–487.10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.033]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chin A., O’Dowd A.P., Gregory K.J., 2013. Urbanization and river channels. In: Shroder J., Wohl E.E. (eds), Treatise on Geomorphology, Vol. 9, Fluvial Geomorphology. Academic Press, San Diego: 809–827.10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00266-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Clivaz M., Reynard E., 2017. How to integrate invisible geomorphosites in an inventory: A case study in the Rhone River valley (Switzerland). Geoheritage, doi:10.1007/s12371-017-0222-7.10.1007/s12371-017-0222-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cooke R.U., 1976. Urban geomorphology. Geographical Journal 142: 59–65.10.2307/1796025]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooke R.U., 1984. Geomorphological hazards in Los Angeles: A study of slope and sediment problems in a metropolitan county. Allen & Unwin, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooke R.U., Brunsden D., Doornkamp J.C., Jones D.K.C., 1982. Urban geomorphology in Drylands. Oxford University Press, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coratza P., Hobléa F., 2017. The specificities of geomorphological heritage. In: Reynard E., Brilha J. (eds), Geoheritage: Assessment, protection, and management. Elsevier, Waltham, in press.10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00005-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Côté A., Joly M.C., Verner A., 2009). Géotourisme urbain. Le cas de Montréal (Urban geotourism. The case of Montreal). Téoros 28(2): 97–99.10.7202/1024813ar]Search in Google Scholar
[Cousins S.A.O., 2001. Analysis of land-cover transitions based on 17th and 18th century cadastral maps and aerial photographs. Landscape Ecology 16: 41–54, doi:10.1023/A:1008108704358.10.1023/A:1008108704358]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Del Lama E.A., de La Corte Bacci D., Martins L., da Glória Motta Garcia M., Kazumi Dehira L., 2015. Urban geotourism and the old centre of São Paulo City, Brazil. Geoheritage 7: 147–164, doi: 10.1007/s12371-014-0119-7.10.1007/s12371-014-0119-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Del Monte M., Fredi P., Pica A., Vergari F., 2013. Geosites within Rome City center (Italy): a mixture of cultural and geomorphological heritage. Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quaternaria 36: 241–257, doi: 10.4461/GFDQ.2013.36.0.10.4461/GFDQ.2013.36.0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Del Monte M., D’Orefice M., Luberti G.M., Marini R., Pica A., Vergari F., 2016. Geomorphological classification of urban landscapes: the case study of Rome (Italy). Journal of Maps 12: 178–189.10.1080/17445647.2016.1187977]Search in Google Scholar
[Dóniz-Páez J., Becerra-Ramírez R., 2015. Geoturismo urbano en Puerto de la Cruz (Tenerife, Canarias, España) (Urban geotourism in Puerto de la Cruz). In: Hilario A., Mendia M., Monge-Ganuzas M., Fernández E., Vegas J., Belmonte A. (eds), Patrimonio geológico y geoparques, avances de un camino para todos. Publicaciones del Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Serie: Cuadernos Del Museo Geominero 18: 347–352.]Search in Google Scholar
[Douglas I., 2005. The urban geomorphology of Kuala Lumpur. In: Gupta A. (ed.), The Physical Geography of South-East Asia. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 344–357.10.1093/oso/9780199248025.003.0032]Search in Google Scholar
[Douglas I., James P., 2015. Urban ecology. An introduction. Routledge, London.10.4324/9780203108703]Search in Google Scholar
[Douglas I., Lawson N., 2015. The human dimensions of geomorphological work in Britain. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(2): 9–33.10.1162/108819800569771]Search in Google Scholar
[Dowling R.K., Newsome D. (eds), 2006. Geotourism: sustainability, impacts and management. Elsevier, Oxford.10.4324/9780080455334]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellis E.C., 2011. Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369: 1010–1035.10.1098/rsta.2010.033121282158]Search in Google Scholar
[Fernandes N.F., Tupinambá M., Mello C.L., de Peixoto M.N.O., 2010. Rio de Janeiro: A metropolis between granite-gneiss massifs. In: Migoń P. (ed.), Geomorphological landscapes of the World. Springer, Dordrecht: 89–100.10.1007/978-90-481-3055-9_10]Search in Google Scholar
[Gierlinger S., Haidvogel G., Gingrich S., Krausmann F., 2013. Feeding and cleaning the city: the role of the urban waterscape in provision and disposal in Vienna during the industrial transformation. Water History 5: 219–239.10.1007/s12685-013-0075-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Gomez-Heras M., Smith B.J., Viles H.A., 2010. Oxford stone revisited: causes and consequences of diversity in building limestone used in the historic centre of Oxford, England. In: Přikryl R., Török Á (eds), Natural stone resources for historical monuments. The Geological Society, London, Special Publications 333: 101–110.10.1144/SP333.10]Search in Google Scholar
[Gordon J.E., Barron H.F., Hansom J.D., Thomas, M.F., 2012. Engaging with geodiversity – why it matters. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 123: 1–6.10.1016/j.pgeola.2011.08.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Goudie A.S., Viles H.A., 2016. Geomorphology in the Anthropocene. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781316498910]Search in Google Scholar
[Grandgirard V., 1997. Géomorphologie, protection de la nature et gestion du paysage (Geomorphology, nature protection and landscape management). PhD Thesis in Geography, University of Fribourg.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gray M., Gordon J.E., Brown E.J., 2013. Geodiversity and the ecosystem approach – the contribution of geoscience in delivering integrated environmental management. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 124: 659–73.10.1016/j.pgeola.2013.01.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Gross M., Zimmerman R., 2002. Interpretive centers. The history, design, and development of nature and visitor centers. UW-SP Foundation Press, Stevens Point.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haidvogel G., Guthyne-Horvath M., Gierlinger S., Hohensinner S., Sonnlechner C., 2013. Urban land for a growing city at the banks of a moving river: Vienna’s spread into the Danube island Unterer Werd from the late 17th to the beginning of the 20th century. Water History 5: 195–217.10.1007/s12685-013-0078-y481129227069521]Search in Google Scholar
[Halsall T.J., 2000. Geological constraints on the siting of fortifications: examples from medieval Britain. In: Rose E.P.F., Nathanail C.P. (eds), Geology and warfare: Examples of the influence of terrain and geologists on military operations. The Geological Society, London: 3–31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hohensinner S., Sonnlechner C., Schmid M., Winiwarter V., 2013a. Two steps back, one step forward: reconstructing the dynamic Danube riverscape under human influence in Vienna. Water History 5: 121–143.10.1007/s12685-013-0076-0481129127069519]Search in Google Scholar
[Hohensinner S., Lager B., Sonnlechner C., Haidvogel G., Gierlinger S., Schmid M., Krausmann F., Winiwarter V., 2013b. Changes in water and land: the reconstructed Viennese riverscape from 1500 to the present. Water History 5: 145–172.10.1007/s12685-013-0074-2481129027069520]Search in Google Scholar
[Hose T.A., 1995. Selling the story of Britain’s stone. Environmental Interpretation 10(2): 16–17.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hose T.A, 2012. 3G’s for modern geotourism. Geoheritage 4: 7–24.10.1007/s12371-011-0052-y]Search in Google Scholar
[James L.A., Hodgson M.E., Ghoshal S., Latiolais M.M., 2012. Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis. Geomorphology 137: 181–198, doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.039.10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.039]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jamot C., 2001. Clermont-Ferrand. Mappemonde 64: 30–35.10.3406/mappe.2001.1704]Search in Google Scholar
[Jordan H., Hamilton K., Lawley R., Price S.J., 2014. Anthropogenic contribution to the geological and geomorphological record: A case study from Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK. Geomorphology 253: 534–546.10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.07.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Kasprzak M., Traczyk A., 2014. LiDAR and 2D Electrical Resistivity Tomography as a supplement of geomorphological investigations in urban areas: a case study from the City of Wrocław (SW Poland). Pure and Applied Geophysics 171: 835–855.10.1007/s00024-013-0693-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Lamich D., Marschalko M., Yilmaz I., Bednářová P., Niemiec D., Durďák J., Kubečka K., Duda R., 2016. Utilization of engineering geology in geo-tourism: few case studies of subsidence influence on historical churches in Ostrava-Karvina District (Czech Republic). Environmental Earth Sciences 75: 128, doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4993-310.1007/s12665-015-4993-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lave R., Wilson M.W., Barron E.S., Biermann C., Carey M.A., Duvall C.S., Johnson L., Lane K.M., McClintock N., Munroe D., Pain R., Proctor J., Rhoads B.L., Robertson M.M., Rossi J., Sayre N.F., Simon G., Tadaki M., Van Dyke C., 2014. Intervention: Critical physical geography. The Canadian Geographer 58: 1–10, doi: 10.1111/cag.1206110.1111/cag.12061]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Li P., Qian H., Wu J., 2014. Accelerate research on land creation. Nature 510: 29-31.10.1038/510029a24910868]Search in Google Scholar
[Lucchesi S., Giardino M., 2015. Historical archives data for the reconstruction of geomorphological modifications in the urban area of Turin (NW Italy). In: Lollino G. et al. (eds), Engineering geology for society and territory, vol. 8. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland: 447–452, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09408-3_46.10.1007/978-3-319-09408-3_46]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin S., 2014. Interactive visual media for geomorphological heritage interpretation. Theoretical approach and examples. Geoheritage 6(2): 149–157.10.1007/s12371-014-0107-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin S., Regolini-Bissig G., Perret A., Kozlik L., 2010. Elaboration et évaluation de produits géotouristiques. Propositions méthodologiques (Elaboration and evaluation of geotouristic products. Methodological proposals). Téoros 29(2): 55–66.10.7202/1024871ar]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin S., Reynard E., Pellitero Ondicol R., Ghiraldi L., 2014. Multi-scale web mapping for geoheritage visualisation and promotion. Geoheritage 6: 141–148.10.1007/s12371-014-0102-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Martín-Díaz J., Nofre J., Oliva M., Palma P., 2011. Geomorphological risks, suburbanisation and neoliberalisation of the urban space in post-war Sarajevo. Area 47:371–378.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCall G.J.H., De Mulder E.F.J., Marker B.R., 1996. Urban Geoscience. Balkema, Rotterdam.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meadows M.E., Compton J.S., 2015. Table Mountain: Wonder of nature at the foot of Africa. In: Grab S., Knight J. (eds), Landscapes and landforms of South Africa. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland: 95–102.10.1007/978-3-319-03560-4_11]Search in Google Scholar
[Migoń P., Pijet-Migoń E., 2017. Viewpoint geosites – values, conservation and management issues. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, doi:10.1016/j.pgeola.2017.05.00710.1016/j.pgeola.2017.05.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mohapatra S.N., Pani P., Sharma M., 2014. Rapid urban expansion and its implications on geomorphology: A remote sensing and GIS based study. Geography Journal 2014: ID 361459, doi: 10.1155/2014/361459.10.1155/2014/361459]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Moscariello A., 2017. The geomorphological landscapes in the Geneva Basin. In: Reynard E. (ed.), Landscapes and Landforms of Switzerland. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, in press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mozzi P., Fontana A., Ferrarese F., Ninfo A., Campana S., Francese R., 2016. The Roman City of Altinum, Venice Lagoon, from remote sensing and geophysical prospection. Archaeol. Prospect. 23: 27–44, doi:10.1002/arp.152010.1002/arp.1520]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Onde H., 1966. Réflexions sur quelques sites urbains (Reflections on some urban sites). Cahiers de géographie de Besançon 14: 107–113.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ortega-Guerrero A., Rudolph D.L., Cherry J.A., 1999. Analysis of long-term land subsidence near Mexico City: Field investigations and predictive modeling. Water Resources Research 35(11): 3327–3341, doi: 10.1029/1999WR90014810.1029/1999WR900148]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ortiz-Zamora D., Ortega-Guerrero A., 2010. Evolution of long-term land subsidence near Mexico City: Review, field investigations, and predictive simulations. Water Resources Research 46: W01513, doi: 10.1029/2008WR00739810.1029/2008WR007398]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Panizza M., 2001. Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and example of geomorphological survey. Chinese Science Bulletin 46, Suppl. Bd: 4–6.10.1007/BF03187227]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Palacio-Prieto J.L., 2015. Geoheritage within cities: Urban geosites in Mexico City. Geoheritage 7: 365–373, doi:10.1007/s12371-014-0136-610.1007/s12371-014-0136-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pelfini M., Bollati I., 2014. Landforms and geomorphosites ongoing changes: Concepts and implications for geoheritage promotion. Quaestiones Geographicae 33(1): 131–143.10.2478/quageo-2014-0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Perez-Monserrat E.M., Buergo M.A., Gomes-Heras M., Muriel M.J.V., Gonzalez R.F., 2013. An urban geomonumental route focusing on the petrological and decay features of traditional building stones used in Madrid, Spain. Environmental Earth Sciences 69: 1071–1084.10.1007/s12665-012-2164-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Pica A., Vergari F., Fredi P., Del Monte M., 2016. The Aeterna Urbs geomorphological heritage (Rome, Italy). Geoheritage 8(1): 31–42, doi: 10.1007/s12371-015-0150-310.1007/s12371-015-0150-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pica A., Reynard E., Grangier L., Kaiser C., Ghiraldi L., Perotti L., Del Monte M., 2017. GeoGuides, urban geotourism offer powered by mobile application technology. Geoheritage, doi: 10.1007/s12371-017-0237-010.1007/s12371-017-0237-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pickett S.T.A., Cadenasso M.L., Grove J.M., Nilon C.H., Pouyat R.V., Zipperer W.C., Costanza R., 2001. Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32: 127–157.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Price S.J., Ford J.R., Cooper A.H., Neal C., 2011. Humans as major geological and geomorphological agents in the Anthropocene: the significance of artificial ground in Great Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369: 1056–1084.10.1098/rsta.2010.029621282160]Search in Google Scholar
[Přikryl R., Török Á. (eds), 2010. Natural stone resources for historical monuments. The Geological Society, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynard E., 2005a. Géomorphosites et paysage (Geomorphosites and Landscape). Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement 3: 181–188.10.4000/geomorphologie.338]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynard E., 2005b. Geomorphological sites, public policies and property rights. Conceptualization and examples from Switzerland. Il Quaternario 18(1): 321–330.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynard E., 2009. Geomorphosites: definitions and characteristics. In: Reynard E., Coratza P., Regolini-Bissig G. (eds), Geomorphosites. Pfeil Verlag, München: 9–20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynard E., 2017. La géomorphologie urbaine au service du projet (Urban geomorphology at the service of the project). In: Delabarre M., Dugua B. (eds), Faire la ville par le projet. Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, Lausanne: 185–203.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynard E., Coratza P., 2013. Scientific research on geomorphosites. Areview of the activities of the IAG working group on geomorphosites over the last twelve years. Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat. 36: 159–168.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynard E., Coratza P., Regolini-Bissig G. (eds.), 2009. Geomorphosites. Pfeil Verlag, München.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynard E., Hobléa F., Cayla N., Gauchon C., 2011. Iconic sites for Alpine geology and geomorphology. Rediscovering heritage?. Revue de Géographie Alpine | Journal of Alpine Research [on-line], 99(2), doi: 10.4000/rga.143510.4000/rga.1435]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Reynard E., Kaiser C., Martin S., Regolini G., 2015. An application for Geosciences communication by smartphones and tablets. In: Lollino G. et al. (eds), Engineering geology for society and territory, vol. 8. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland: 265–268, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09408-3_4610.1007/978-3-319-09408-3_46]Search in Google Scholar
[Robinson E., 1982. A geological walk around the City of London – royal exchange to Aldgate. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 93: 225–246.10.1016/S0016-7878(82)80001-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Robinson E., 1984. London: illustrated geological walks, vol. 1. Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh.]Search in Google Scholar
[Robinson E., 1985. London: illustrated geological walks, vol. 2. Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodrigues M.L., Machado C.R., Freire E., 2011. Geotourism routes in urban areas: a preliminary approach to the Lisbon geoheritage survey. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 8(2): 281–294.]Search in Google Scholar
[San-Antonio-Gómez C., Velilla C., Manzano-Agugliaro F., 2014. Urban and landscape changes through historical maps: The Real Sitio of Aranjuez (1775–2005), a case study. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 44: 47–58.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.12.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider A., Fried M.A., Potere D., 2009. A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data. Environmental Research Letters 4: 1–11.10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sherlock R.L., 1922. Man as a geological agent: an account of his action on inanimate nature. Whitherby, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shimizu, E., Fuse T., 2003. Rubber-sheeting of historical maps in GIS and its application to landscape visualization of old-time cities: focusing on Tokyo of the past. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, 11A-3, CD-ROM.]Search in Google Scholar
[Siles G.L., Alcérreca-Huert, J.C., López-Quiroz P., Niemeier W., 2015. Long term subsidence analysis and soil fracturing zonation based on InSAR time series modelling in Northern Zona Metropolitana del Valle de Mexico. Remote Sensing 7: 6908–6931, doi: 10.3390/rs7060690810.3390/rs70606908]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sivaplan M., Savenije H.H.G., Blöschl G., 2012. Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water. Hydrological Processes 26(8): 1270–1276, doi: 10.1002/hyp.842610.1002/hyp.8426]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith M., Paron P., Griffiths J., 2011. Geomorphological mapping. Methods and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steffen W., Grinevald J., Crutzen P., McNeill J., 2011. The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369: 842–867.10.1098/rsta.2010.032721282150]Search in Google Scholar
[Szabó J., Dávid L., Loczy D. (eds), 2010. Anthropogenic geomorphology: A guide to Man-made landforms. Springer, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-90-481-3058-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Stäuble S., Martin S., Reynard E., 2008. Historical mapping for landscape reconstruction: examples from the Canton of Valais (Switzerland). In: Mountain Mapping and Visualisation. Proceedings of the 6th ICA Mountain Cartography Workshop, 11–15 February 2008, Lenk, Switzerland: 211–217.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tarolli P., Sofia G., 2016. Human topographic signatures and derived geomorphic processes across landscapes. Geomorphology 255: 140–161.10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.12.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Thornbush M., 2015. Geography, urban geomorphology and sustainability. Area 47: 350–353.10.1111/area.12218]Search in Google Scholar
[Tilden F., 1957. Interpreting our heritage. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Valette P., Carozza J.M., 2013. Toulouse face à la Garonne: emprise de l’urbanisation dans la plaine inondable et géohistoire des aménagements fluviaux (Toulouse facing the Garonne River: influence of urbanization in the floodplain and geohistory of river developments). Geographicalia 63–64: 77–203.10.26754/ojs_geoph/geoph.201363-64859]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilczkiewicz M.Z., 2016. The role of artificial landscape in recreational parks – selected examples. Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape 1: 105–117, doi: 10.15576/GLL/2016.1.10510.15576/GLL/2016.1.105]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Williams D.B., 2015. Too high and too steep. Reshaping Seattle’s topography. University of Washington Press, Seattle.]Search in Google Scholar
[Winiwarter V., Schmid M., Dressel G., 2013a. Looking at half a millennium of co-existence: the Danube in Vienna as a socio-natural site. Water History 5: 101–119.10.1007/s12685-013-0079-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolman M.G., 1967. A cycle of sedimentation and erosion in urban river channels. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography 49: 385–395.10.1080/04353676.1967.11879766]Search in Google Scholar
[Yamaguchi K., Nakajima I., Kawasaki M., 2008. The application of the surrounding landform to the landscape design in japanese gardens. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development 8(4): 655–665.]Search in Google Scholar