[Aichholzer G., 2005. Service take-up and impacts of e-government in Austria. In: Wimmer M.A., Traunmüller R., Grönlund Å., Andersen K.V. (eds), Electronic government. 4th International Conference, EGOV 2005, Proceedings, 3591/2005, Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 93-104.10.1007/11545156_9]Search in Google Scholar
[Amoretti F., 2007. Digital international governance. In: Anttiroiko A-V., Mälkiä M. (eds), Encyclopedia of digital government. Idea Group Reference, Hershey, London: 365-370.10.4018/978-1-59140-789-8.ch056]Search in Google Scholar
[Anttiroiko A.-V., 2005. Urban e-government in Finland. In: Drüke H. (ed.), Local electronic government. A comparative study. Routledge, London-New York: 19-58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Anttiroiko A.-V., 2008. Introductory chapter. A brief introduction to the field of e-government. In: Anttiroiko A.-V. (ed.), Electronic government: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Information Science Reference, Hershey- New York: xli-lxxv.10.4018/978-1-59904-947-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldersheim H., Øgård M., 2008. Innovation in e-government: Analysis of municipal web pages in the Nordic countries. Information Polity 13(3-4): 125-137.10.3233/IP-2008-0133]Search in Google Scholar
[Bélanger F., Carter L., 2008. Trust and risk in e-government adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17(2): 165-176.10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Bertot J.C., Jaeger P.T., 2008. The e-government paradox: Better customer service doesn’t necessarily cost less. Government Information Quarterly 25(2): 149-154.10.1016/j.giq.2007.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonina C.M., Cordella A., 2008. The new public management, e-government and the notion of ‘public value’: Lessons from Mexico. AIS Special Interest Group on ICT and Global Development Workshop, Paris, December 13, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carbo T., Williams J.G., 2004. Models and metrics for evaluating local electronic government systems and services. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 3(2): 95-104.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carter L., Weerakkody V., 2008. E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers 10(4): 473-482.10.1007/s10796-008-9103-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Castells M., 2010. The rise of the network society. The information age: Economy, society and culture. Vol. 1, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cellary W., 2002. organizacja administracji publicznej na potrzeby obywateli (organisation of public administration for the needs of citizens). In: Cellary W. (ed.), Polska w drodze do globalnego społeczeństwa informacyjnego. Raport o rozwoju społecznym. UNDP Program Narodów Zjednoczonych ds. Rozwoju, Warszawa: 94-97.]Search in Google Scholar
[Centeno C., van Bavel R., Burgelman J.C., 2005. A prospective view of e-government in the European Union. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 3(2): 59-66.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chojnicki Z., 1993. Postmodernistyczne zmiany globalnego porządku społeczno-gospodarczego (Postmodern changes in the global socio-economic order). In: Kukliński A. (ed.), Polonia, quo vadis? Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 12(45): 167-204.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen G., Nijkamp P., 2004. City, ICT and policy. Investigaciones Regionales 4(1): 29-51.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cordella A., 2007. e-government: Towards the e-bureaucratic form? Journal of Information Technology 22(3): 265-274.10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000105]Search in Google Scholar
[Corey K.e., Wilson M.I., 2009. e-business and e-commerce. In: Kitchin R., Thrift N. (eds), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography 3: 285-290.10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00148-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Cotterill S., 2009. Local e-government partnerships. In: Reddick C.G. (ed.), Handbook of research on strategies for local e-government adoption and implementation: Comparative studies. Information Science Reference, Hershey-New York: 105-121.10.4018/978-1-60566-282-4.ch006]Search in Google Scholar
[van Deursen A., van Dijk J., 2009. Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly 26(2): 333-340.10.1016/j.giq.2008.11.002]Search in Google Scholar
[van Dijk J., 2006. The network society. Social aspects of new media. SAGE, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Dijk J., Peters o., ebbers W., 2008. explaining the acceptance and use of government Internet services: A multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly 25(3): 379-399.10.1016/j.giq.2007.09.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Draper N., Smith H., 1981. Applied regression analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Drüke H., 2005a. Introduction. In: Drüke H. (ed.), Local electronic government. A comparative study. Routledge, London- New York: 1-18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Drüke H., 2005b. Concluding remarks on national specifics and transfer and adoption of good practice. In: Drüke H. (ed.), Local electronic government. A comparative study. Routledge, London-New York: 269-292.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Duivenboden H., Lips M., 2005. Responsive e-government services: Towards ‘new’ public management. In: Bakkers V., Homburg V. (eds), The Information Ecology of e-Government. E-Government as Institutional and Technological Innovation in Public Administration. IOS Press: 141-154.]Search in Google Scholar
[Engel A., 2004. The economic evaluation of e-government: The right strategic decision? German Journal of Urban Studies (Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften DfK), 2/2004, Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik, Berlin (http://www.difu.de).]Search in Google Scholar
[European Governance and Cyberdemocracy, 2001. European Commision, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fairchild A., Vuyst de B., 2007. Governmental collaboration and infrastructural standards in Belgium. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 5(2): 145-152.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferro e., Sorrentino M., 2010. Can intermunicipal collaboration help the diffusion of e-government in peripheral areas? evidence from Italy. Government Information Quarterly 27(1): 17-25.10.1016/j.giq.2009.07.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Frissen P.H.A., 1998. Public administration in cyberspace. In: Snellen I.Th.M., van de Donk W.B.H.J. (eds), Public administration in an information age. A handbook. IOS Press, Amsterdam: 33-46.]Search in Google Scholar
[From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less, 1993, NPR 93-a Report of the National Performance Review (http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/stis1993/npr93a/npr93a.txt).]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallego-Álvarez I., Rodríguez-Domínguez L., García- Sánchez I.M., 2010. Are determining factors of municipal e-government common to a worldwide municipal view? An intra-country comparison. Government Information Quarterly 27(4): 423-430.10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Gil-Garcia J.R., Pardo T.A., 2005. E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly 22(2): 187-216.10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Grabow B., Drüke H., Siegfried C., 2004. Factors for success for local community e-government. German Journal of Urban Studies (Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften DfK), 2/2004, Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik, Berlin (http://www.difu.de).]Search in Google Scholar
[Harvey D., 1990. The condition of postmodernity. An enquiry into the origins of cultural changes. Blackwell, Cambridge- Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heeks R., 1998. Information systems for public sector management. Working Paper Series 5, Public Sector Management Information Systems, Institute for Development Policy and Management, Manchester.10.2139/ssrn.3540075]Search in Google Scholar
[Heeks R., 2006. Implementing and managing e-government. SAGE, London.10.4135/9781446220191]Search in Google Scholar
[Heeks R., Bailur S., 2007. Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly 24(2): 243-265.10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005]Search in Google Scholar
[van der Heijden J., 2007. How business changes government in the information age. In: Anttiroiko A.-V., Mälkiä M. (eds), Encyclopedia of Digital Government. Idea Group Reference, Hershey, London: 928-932.10.4018/978-1-59140-789-8.ch139]Search in Google Scholar
[Heller J., Farelnik e., 2013. Finanse i samodzielność ekonomiczna a ustrój samorządów terytorialnych w Polsce (Finances and economic independence versus the local government system in Poland). Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 2(52): 81-94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hill H., 2004. Transformation of the administration by e-government. German Journal of Urban Studies (Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften DfK), 2, Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik, Berlin (http://www.difu.de).]Search in Google Scholar
[Horst M., Kuttschreuter M., Gutteling J.M., 2007. Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior 23(4): 1838-1852.10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Inkinen T., Jauhiainen J.S., 2007. Public authorities and the local information society. In: Anttiroiko A.-V., Mälkiä M. (eds), Encyclopedia of digital government. Idea Group Publishing, Information Science Publishing, Hershey, London: 1370-1376.10.4018/978-1-59140-789-8.ch209]Search in Google Scholar
[Ivankova N.V., Creswell J.W., Stick S.L., 2006. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods 18(1): 3-20.10.1177/1525822X05282260]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaeger P.T., Thompson K.M., 2003. e-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly 20(3): 389-394.10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Jain A., 2004. Using the lens of Max Weber’s theory of bureaucracy to examine e-government research. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (www.hicss.hawaii.edu/diglib.htm).10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265321]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaczmarek T., 2005. Struktury terytorialno-administracyjne i ich reformy w krajach europejskich (Territorial-administrative structures and their reform in European countries). Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamal M., Weerakkody V., Irani Z., 2011. Analyzing the role of stakeholders in the adoption of technology integration solutions in UK local government: An exploratory study. Government Information Quarterly 28(2): 200-210.10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuk G., 2002. The digital divide and the quality of electronic service delivery in local government in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly 20(4): 353-363.10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Lucke J., 2007. Portals for the public sector. In: Anttiroiko A.-V., Mälkiä M. (eds), Encyclopedia of Digital Government. Idea Group Reference, Hershey, London: 1328-1333.10.4018/978-1-59140-789-8.ch203]Search in Google Scholar
[Luk S.C.Y., 2009. The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong. Government Information Quarterly 26(4): 594-604.10.1016/j.giq.2009.02.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Margetts H., 2009. Public management change and e-government: The emergence of digital-era governance. In: Chadwick A., Howard P.N. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics. Routledge, London: 114-127.]Search in Google Scholar
[van der Meer A., van Winden W., 2003. E-governance in cities: A comparison of urban information and communication technology policies. Regional Sudies 37(4): 407-419.10.1080/0034340032000074433]Search in Google Scholar
[Millard J., 2003. ePublic services in Europe: Past, present and future. Research findings and new challenges. Danish Technological Institute, Aarhus.]Search in Google Scholar
[Misra D.C., 2001. Select aspects of conceptual foundations of e-government: Clearing the fog for a better vision. Foundations of E-government, GIFT Publishing: 21-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moon M.J., 2002. The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review 62(4): 424-433.10.1111/0033-3352.00196]Search in Google Scholar
[Moon M.J., Norris D.F., 2005. Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal 15(1): 43-60.10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00185.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Musso J., Weare C., Hale M., 2000. Designing Web technologies for local governance reform: Good management of good democracy? Political Communication 17: 1-17.10.1080/105846000198486]Search in Google Scholar
[Paskaleva-Shapira K., 2009. Assessing local readiness for city e-governance in Europe. In: Reddick C.G. (ed.), Handbook of research on strategies for local e-government adoption and implementation: Comparative studies. Information Science Reference, Hershey-New York: 62-82.10.4018/978-1-60566-282-4.ch004]Search in Google Scholar
[Perdał R., 2014. Czynniki rozwoju elektronicznej administracji w samorządzie lokalnym w Polsce (Factors of e-government development in the local government in Poland). Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.]Search in Google Scholar
[Persson A., Goldkuhl G., 2010. Government value paradigms - bureaucracy, new public management, and e-government. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 27(4): 45-62.10.17705/1CAIS.02704]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodríguez-Domínguez L., García-Sánchez I.M., Gallego-Álvarez I., 2011. Determining factors of e-government development: A worldwide national approach. International Public Management Journal 14(2): 218-248.10.1080/10967494.2011.597152]Search in Google Scholar
[van Ryzin G.G. 2004. Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(3): 433-448.10.1002/pam.20020]Search in Google Scholar
[Sallmann R., 2005. ogólnokrajowy rozwój e-government. Austriackie formy rozwiązań (National development of e-government. Austrian solutions). In: Proniewicz J., Szczepańska K. (eds), Efektywna polityka i administracja. Strategie i instrumenty zarządzania miastami. Związek Miast Polskich, Österreichicher Städtebund, KDZ - Zentrum für Verwaltungsforschung, Poznań: 151-177.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schedler K., Summermatter L., 2007. Customer orientation in electronic government: Motives and effects. Government Information Quarterly 24(2): 291-311.10.1016/j.giq.2006.05.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Sirkemaa S., 2007. The role of partnerships in development of e-services - highlighting public sector organizations. International Journal of Public Information Systems 3(3): 201-212.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stiglitz J.E., 2002. Globalization and its discontents. W.W. Norton & Company, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stryjakiewicz T., 2000. Implications of globalisation for regions and localities in an economic transition: The case of Poland. In: Parysek J.J., Stryjakiewicz T. (eds), Polish economy in transition. Spatial perspectives. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań: 7-28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Swianiewicz P., 2001. Życzliwa obojętność. Władze lokalne i reforma samorządowa w oczach opinii publicznej w krajach Europy Środkowej (Friendly indifference. Local authorities and the local-government reform in the public opinion of Central European countries). EUROREG, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative of the open Society Institute, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[The Role of eGovernment for Europe’s Future, 2003. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 26 Sept. 2003, CoM 2003 (567) final, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weber M., 1976. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weerakkody V., el-Haddadeh R., Sabol T., Ghoneim A., Dzupka P., 2012. E-government implementation strategies in developed and transition economies: A comparative study. International Journal of Information Management 32(1): 66-74.10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.10.005]Search in Google Scholar
