Transition Towards Transradial Approach Improves Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction PCI

1. Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trials: the first decade. J Interv Cardiol. 1995; 8(2):117–135.10.1111/j.1540-8183.1995.tb00526.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Bahit MC, Cannon CP, Antman EM, et al. Direct comparison of characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients enrolled versus patients not enrolled in clinical trial at centers participating in the TIMI 9 Trial and TIMI 9 Registry. Am Heart J. 2003; 145: 109–117.10.1067/mhj.2003.43Search in Google Scholar

3. Hartzler GO, Rutherford BD, Mc Conahy DR, et all. : Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with and without thrombolytic therapy for treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1983, 106: 965-97310.1016/0002-8703(83)90639-7Search in Google Scholar

4. Kaev M, Kalpak O,: Pharmacological Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction: , Mak Med Pregled No 44, 1-135, Skopje 2000Search in Google Scholar

5. Stone GW. Stenting and IIb/IIIa receptor blockade in acute myocardial infarction: an introduction to the CADILLAC trial. J Invas Cardiol 1998;10(suppl B):36B-47BSearch in Google Scholar

6. Mehran R, Pocock S, Nikolsky E, et al. Impact of bleeding on mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention results from a patient-levelpooled analysis of the REPLACE-2 (Randomized Evaluation of PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events), ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy), and HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trials. J Am Coll CardiolIntv 2011; 4:654–64.10.1016/j.jcin.2011.02.011Search in Google Scholar

7. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: The ACCESS study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29:1269–1275.10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00064-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Kedev S. Radial or femoral approach for patients with acute coronary syndrome. Cardiology International, 2012:45-49.Search in Google Scholar

9. Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H, et al. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(7):698-70610.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.011Search in Google Scholar

10. Doyle BJ, Ting HH, Bell MR, et al. Major femoral bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predictors, and impact on long-term survival among 17,901 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2005. JACC Cardiovasc Interv.2008;1(2):202-20910.1016/j.jcin.2007.12.006Search in Google Scholar

11. Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C, et al. Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the EAPCI and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention. 2013; 8(11):1242-1251.10.4244/EIJV8I11A192Search in Google Scholar

12. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHAguideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: report of the American College оf Cardiology-Foundation/AmericanHeart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am CollCardiol 2013;61:e78–140Search in Google Scholar

13. Bernat I, Horak D, Stasek J, Mates M, et al. STEMI-RADIAL: a prospective randomized trial of radial vs. femoral access in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Paper presented at: Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) Scientific Symposium; October 26, 2012; Miami, FL.Search in Google Scholar

14. Altman DG. Relation between several variables. In: Altman DG, ed. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991. p. 325-61.Search in Google Scholar

15. Popma JJ, Bashore TD. Qualitative and quantitative angiography. In: Topol E, editor. Textbook of interventional cardiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1994. p. 1052-68Search in Google Scholar

16. Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, et al. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes (CURRENT-OASIS 7): a randomized factorial trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1233–124310.1016/S0140-6736(10)61088-4Search in Google Scholar

17. Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, Bertrand OF, Gilchrist IC. The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol2010; 55:2187–95.10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.03920466199Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitionsfor cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the BleedingAcademic Research Consortium. Circulation 2011;123:2736–4710.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449Search in Google Scholar

19. Moher D, Dulberg S C, Wells G. Statistical Power, Sample Size, and Their Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials. JAMA. 1994;272:122-12410.1001/jama.1994.03520020048013Search in Google Scholar

20. Tushar Vijay Sakpal. Sample Size Estimation in Clinical Trial. PICR April-June 2010 Vol 1 Issue 2:67-69.Search in Google Scholar

21. Hetherington S L et al. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: changing patterns of vascular access, radial versus femoral artery. Heart 2009 95: 1612-161810.1136/hrt.2009.170233Search in Google Scholar

22. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60:2481–9.10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409-142010.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2Search in Google Scholar

24. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2009;157:132–14010.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.02319081409Search in Google Scholar

25. Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY, et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: A report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008; 1:379–386.10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.00719463333Search in Google Scholar

26. Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H, et al. Influence of access site selection on PCI-related adverse events in patients with STEMI: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Heart. 2012;98(4):303-31110.1136/heartjnl-2011-30055822147900Search in Google Scholar