First Case of Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Using Stent Assisted Coiling at the Department of Neurosurgery in Skopje

1. Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, et al: Intracranial berry aneurysms: NAgiographic and clinical results after endovascular treatment. Radiology 206: 499-510, 1998.10.1148/radiology.206.2.94572059457205Search in Google Scholar

2. Guimond JG, Chagnon PM, Bojanowski MW. Clipping vs. coiling in acute aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: Should the patient's medical condition influence treatment modality? Neurochirurgie. 2012 Apr-Jun; 58(2-3): 115-24.10.1016/j.neuchi.2012.02.01222464600Search in Google Scholar

3. Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Dion J, et al: Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2: preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg. 75: 8-14, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

4. Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Sepetka I, et al: Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1: electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg. 75: 1-7, 1991 20. Hieshima GB, Higashida.Search in Google Scholar

5. Konczalla J, Platz J, Brawanski N, Güresir E, Lescher S, Senft C, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Berkefeld J, Seifert V. Endovascular and surgical treatment of internal carotid bifurcation aneurysms: comparison of results, outcome, and mid-term follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2015 May; 76(5): 540-50.10.1227/NEU.000000000000067225635884Search in Google Scholar

6. Lad SP, Babu R, Rhee MS, Franklin RL, Ugiliweneza B, Hodes J, et al. Long-term economic impact of coiling vs clipping for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2013 Jun; 72(6): 1000-11.10.1227/01.neu.0000429284.91142.5623612602Search in Google Scholar

7. Lot G, Houdart E, Cophignon J: Combined management of intracranial aneurysms by surgical and endovascular treatment: Modalities and results from a series of 395 cases. Acta neurochir (Wien). 1999; 141: 557-562.10.1007/s00701005034310929719Search in Google Scholar

8. Mutoh T, Kazumata K, Yokoyama Y, Ishikawa T, Taki Y, Terasaka S, Houkin K. Comparison of postoperative volume status and hemodynamics between surgical clipping and endovascular coiling in patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015 Jan; 27(1): 7-15.10.1097/ANA.000000000000006624733051Search in Google Scholar

9. Park KY, Kim BM, Lim YC, Chung J, Kim DJ, Joo JY, et al. The role of endovascular treatment for ruptured distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms: comparison with microsurgical clipping. J Neuroimaging. 2015 Jan-Feb; 25(1): 81-6.10.1111/jon.1207324299470Search in Google Scholar

10. Ruan C, Long H, Sun H, He M, Yang K, Zhang H, Mao B. Endovascular coiling vs. surgical clipping for unruptured intracranial aneurysm: A meta-analysis. Br J Neurosurg. 2015; 29(4): 485-92.10.3109/02688697.2015.102377126037936Search in Google Scholar

11. Sekhar LN, Tariq F, Morton RP, Ghodke B, Hallam DK, Barber J, Kim LJ. Basilar tip aneurysms: a microsurgical and endovascular contemporary series of 100 patients. Neurosurgery. 2013 Feb; 72(2): 284-98.10.1227/NEU.0b013e318279795223147787Search in Google Scholar

12. Shakir HJ, Levy EI. The blunt truth behind coiling vs clipping: consumers as decision-drivers. Neurosurgery. 2014 Jan; 74(1): E145-6.10.1227/NEU.000000000000015924030174Search in Google Scholar

13. Vanninen R, Koivisto T, Saari T, Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Acute endovascular treatment with electroliticalkly detachable coils-a prospective randomized study. Radiology. 1999; 211: 325-336.10.1148/radiology.211.2.r99ap0632510228510Search in Google Scholar

14. Yassine Kanaan, BS, David Kaneshiro, BS, Kenneth Fraser, MD, David Wang, DO, and Giuseppe Lanzino, MD: Evolution of endovascular therapy for aneurysm treatment, Neurosurgical Focus Feb 2005 / Vol. 18 / No. 2, Pages 1-4.10.3171/foc.2005.18.2.315715447Search in Google Scholar

15. Young Il Jeon, M.D. and Do Hoon Kwon, M.D.: Current Status and Future Prospect of Endovascular Neurosurgery: J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008 Feb; 43(2): 69-78.10.3340/jkns.2008.43.2.69258822719096608Search in Google Scholar