Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical Properties between the Fiber-Reinforced Composite and Zirconium Posts

1. Kovacevska G. Stomatoprosthetic rehabilitation of remaining radix with metal post and core restorations as abutments of fixed structures, Skopje, 1995th 2.Search in Google Scholar

2. Jovanovski S., Evaluation of the impact of surface treatment of ceramic post and core restorations and their effect on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, Skopje. 2012, 102-124.Search in Google Scholar

3. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 39: 400-405.10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80156-5Search in Google Scholar

4. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63: 529-536.10.1016/0022-3913(90)90070-SSearch in Google Scholar

5. Rosen H. Operative procedures on mutilated endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1961; 11: 973-986.10.1016/0022-3913(61)90158-5Search in Google Scholar

6. Silverstein WH. The reinforcement of weakened pulpless teeth. J. Prosthet Dent. 1964; 14: 372-381.10.1016/0022-3913(64)90098-8Search in Google Scholar

7. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984a; 51: 780-784.10.1016/0022-3913(84)90376-7Search in Google Scholar

8. Peroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange K-P, Naumann M. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores-a review. Quintessence Int. 2005; 36: 737-746.Search in Google Scholar

9. Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endopost reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent. 1979; 42:39-44.10.1016/0022-3913(79)90328-7Search in Google Scholar

10. Trabert KC, Caput AA, Abou-Rass M. Tooth fracture- a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod. 1978; 4: 341-345.10.1016/S0099-2399(78)80232-5Search in Google Scholar

11. Tjan AH, Whang SB. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53: 496-500.10.1016/0022-3913(85)90633-XSearch in Google Scholar

12. Naumann M, Preuss A, Rosentritt M. Effect of incomplete crown ferrules on load capacity of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with fiber posts, composite build-ups, and all-ceramic crowns: an in vitro evaluation after chewing simulation. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006; 64: 31-36.10.1080/0001635050033112016428180Search in Google Scholar

13. Lang H, Korkmaz Y, Schneider K, Raab WH-M. Impact of endodontic treatments on the rigidity of the root. J Dent Res. 2006; 85: 364-368.10.1177/15440591060850041616567560Search in Google Scholar

14. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Özcan M, Platzer U. Effect of length and diameter of tapered posts on the retention. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29: 28-34.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00806.xSearch in Google Scholar

15. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowelrestored teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94: 321-329.10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.07.003Search in Google Scholar

16. Qualtrough AJE, Chandler NP, Purton DG. A comparison of the retention of tooth-colored posts. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34: 199-201.Search in Google Scholar

17. Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the retentive and photoelastic properties of two prefabricated endodontic post systems. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26: 488-494.10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00420.xSearch in Google Scholar

18. Shillingburg Jr HT, Fisher DW, Dewhirst RB. Restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1970; 24: 401-409.10.1016/0022-3913(70)90081-8Search in Google Scholar

19. Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 69: 11-16.Search in Google Scholar

20. Hew YS, Purton DG, Love RM. Evaluation of prefabricated root canal posts. J Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28: 207-211.Search in Google Scholar

21. Morgano SM, Hashem AF, Fotoohi K, Rose L. A nationwide survey of contemporary philosophies and techniques of restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 72: 259-267.10.1016/0022-3913(94)90339-5Search in Google Scholar

22. Purton DG, Love RM, Chandler NP. Rigidity and retention of ceramic root canal posts. Oper Dent. 2000; 25: 223-227.Search in Google Scholar

23. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and force of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent. 1999; 27: 275-278.10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00066-9Search in Google Scholar

24. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. A new concept of corono-radicular econstruction: the Composipost (2). Chir Dent Fr. 1990; 60: 69-77.Search in Google Scholar

25. King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 1990; 17: 599-609.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb01431.x2283555Search in Google Scholar

26. Isidor F, Ödman P, Brøndum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1996; 9: 131-136.Search in Google Scholar

27. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000a; 13: 15B-18B.Search in Google Scholar

28. Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Influence of clinical baseline findings on the survival of 2 post systems: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2007; 20: 173-178.Search in Google Scholar

29. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NHJ. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal and ceramic postand- core systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 476-482.Search in Google Scholar