[1. Thorpe A, Neal D. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Lancet. 2003; 361(9366): 1359-67.10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13073-5]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Nickel J. C. Inflammation and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am. 2008; 35(1): 109-1510.1016/j.ucl.2007.09.012]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Garraway W. M, Collins G. N, Lee R. J. High prevalence of benign prostatic hypertrophy in the community. Lancet. 1991; 338(8765): 469-71.10.1016/0140-6736(91)90543-X]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofman R. Complications of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) - Incidence, Management, and Prevention. Eur Urol 2006; 50(5): 969-80.10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.042]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Anson K, Nawrocki J, Buckley J, Fowler C, Kirby R, Lawrence W, et al. A multicenter, randomized, prospective study of endoscopic laser ablation versus transurethral resection of the prostate. Urology. 1995; 46(3): 305-10.10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80211-8]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Ali MN. The outcome of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2001; 11(12): 743-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Rajput M. J, Memon A. S, Shaikh N. A. Transurethral Resection of Prostate versus Transvesical Approach: Frequency of Postoperative Urinary Incontinence: Two Year Study. J Liaquat Uni Med Health Sci 2009; 8(2): 139-142.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. D’Ambrosio D. J, Ruth K, Horwitz E. M, Chen D. Y, Pollack A, Buyyounouski M. K. Does Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) Affect Outcome in Patients Who Subsequently Develop Prostate Cancer?. Urology. 2008; 71(5): 938-41.10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.04918279939]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Оestring J. E. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: medical and minimally invasive treatment options. N Engl J Med. 1995; 332: 99-110.10.1056/NEJM1995011233202077527494]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Hahn R. G. Fluid absorption in endoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2006; 96: 8-20.10.1093/bja/aei27916317031]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Gravenstein D. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) syndrome : a review of the pathophysiology and management. Anesth Analg. 1997; 84: 438-46.10.1213/00000539-199702000-00037]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Okamura K, Terai A, Nojiri Y, Okumura K, Saito S, Ozawa H, et al. Evolution of common clinical path for transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2007; 98(1): 3-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Hawary A, Mukhtar K, Sinclair A, Pearce I. Transurethral resection of the prostate syndrome: almost gone but not forgotten. J Endourol. 2009 Dec; 23(12): 2013-20. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.012910.1089/end.2009.012919821694]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Hurlbert B. J, Wingard D. W. Water intoxication after 15 minutes TURP. Anestesiologhy. 1979; 50: 355-356.10.1097/00000542-197904000-00014]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Hahn R. G. Intravesical pressure during fluid absorption in TURP. Scand Urol Nephrol. 2000; 34: 102-8.10.1080/003655900750016706]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Moorthy H. K, Philip S. Serum electrolytes in turp syndrome - is the role of potassium under estimated? Indian J Anaesth. 2002; 46(6): 441-444.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Shiou Sheng Chen, Alex Tong-Long Lin, Kuang Kuo Chen, Luke S. Chang Hemolysis in Transurethral Resection of the prostate using Distilled Water as the Irrigant. /Chin med assoc. June 2006, Vol. 69, No. 610.1016/S1726-4901(09)70255-2]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Schreingraber S, Heitmann L, Weder W, Finsterer U. Are there acid-base changes during TURP? Anesth Analg. 2000; 90: 946-50.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Hahn R. G. Fluid and electrolyte dynamics during development of the TURP syndrome. Br J Urol. 1990; 66: 79-84.10.1111/j.1464-410X.1990.tb14869.x]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Ayus J. C, Arieff A. I. Glycine-induced hypo-osmolar hyponatremia. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157: 223-6.10.1001/archinte.1997.00440230101013]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Madsen P. O, Naber K. G. The importance of the pressure in the prostatic fossa and absorption of irrigating fluid during transuretheral resection of the prostate. J Urol. 1973; 109: 446-52.10.1016/S0022-5347(17)60449-X]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Dobson P. M, Caldicott L. D, Gerrish S. P, Cole J. R, Channer K. S. Changes in hemodynanic variables during transuretheral resection of the prostate: Comparison of general and spinal anesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1994; 72: 267-71.10.1093/bja/72.3.267]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Basnal S, Afzal L, Mammen K, Osahan N. K, Abraham J. Transient blindness-An unusal symptom of Transuretheral prostatic resection reaction-A Case report. Indian J Anaesth. 2002; 46: 221-3.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Ismail Demirel, Ayse B. Ozer, M. K. Bayar, O. L. Erhan TURP syndrome and severe hyponatremia under general anesthesia. BMJ Case Reports 2012;doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-00689910.1136/bcr-2012-006899]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Boukata B, Sbai H, Messaoudi F, Lafrayiji Z, Bouazzaoui A. E., Kanjaa N. Transurethral Resection of the prostate syndrome: Report of a case. Pan Afr Med J. 2013; 14: 14.10.11604/pamj.2013.14.14.1906]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Oku S, Kadowaki T, Uemura T, Nishioka H. Early detection of absorption of irrigating fluid during transuretheral resection of the prostate with alcohol gas detector tube. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1993; 84: 374-81.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Hammadeh M. Y, Madaan S, Hines J, Philp T. 5-year outcome of a prospective randomized trial to compare transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate and standard transurethral resection. Urology. 2003; 61: 1165-71.10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00109-2]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Charalampos Mamoulakis, Dirk T. Ubbink, Jean J. de la Rosette. Bipolar versus monopolar Transurethral resection of the prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. European Association of Urology 56 (2009) 798-809.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Issa M. M, Young M. R, Bullock A. R, Bouet R, Petros J. A. Dilutional Hyponatremia of TURP syndrome : A historical event in the 21st century. Urology. 2004; 64: 298-301.10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.023]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Stock C, Teber D, de la Rossete J. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate technical modifications and early clinical experience. Minim Invasive Ther Alliet Technol. 2007; 16: 11-21.10.1080/13645700601159410]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Starkman J. S, Santucci R. A. Comparison of bipolar thransurethral resection of the prostate with standard thransurethral prostatectomy: Shorter Stay, earlyier catheter removal and fewer complications. BJU Int. 2005; 95: 69-71.10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05253.x]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Ho H. S, Cheng C. W. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate : A new reference standard? Curr Opion Urol. 2008; 18: 50-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Issa M. M. Technological advances in transurethral resection of the prostate:bipolar versus monopolar TURP. J Endourol. 2008; 22: 1587-95.10.1089/end.2008.0192]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Reuter M, Reuter H. J. Prevention of irrigant absorption during TURP: continuous low-pressure irrigation. Int Urol Nephrol. 1978; 10: 293-30.10.1007/BF02082368]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Agarwal R, Emmett M. The post transurethral resection of prostate syndrome - therapeutic proposals.Am J Kidney Dis. 1994; 24: 108-11. 10.1016/S0272-6386(12)80169-7]Search in Google Scholar