New Developments in Publishing Related to Authorship

1. Neill US. Publish or perish, but at what cost? J Clin Invest. 2008; 118: 2368.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bilić-Zulle L. Research integrity - a cornerstone of existence and development of science [In Croatian]. Biochemia Medica. 2007; 17: 143-50.Search in Google Scholar

3. Donev D. Scientific and Publication Ethics and Misconduct. [In Macedonian]. Vox Medici. Dec 2012; 77: 235-40. Available at: http://www.lkm.org.mk/VoxMedici/77.pdf Accessed: June 30, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

4. Donev D. Principles and ethics in scientific communication in biomedicine. Acta Informatica Medica. 2013; 21 (4): 228-33. Available at: http://www.scopemed.org/?jid=6 Accessed: June 30, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

5. Dobric S. Authorship misusing in scientific publiccations. Vojnosanitetski pregled. 2012; 69(12): 1028-30.Search in Google Scholar

6. Ignjatovic M. The authors and “authors”. Vojnosanitetski pregled. 2006; 63(3): 239-46.Search in Google Scholar

7. Hwang K. How to Write a Scientific Paper: Three Tips to Remember. Arch Plast Surg. 2012 January; 39(1): 77. Available at: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3385294/pdf/aps- 39-77A.pdf Accessed: June 30, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

8. Eggert LD. Best Practices for Allocating Appropriate Credit and Responsibility to Authors of Multi- Authored Articles. Front Psychol. 2011; 2: 196. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3164 109/ Accessed: Jun 24, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

9. Horner J, Minifie F. D. Research ethics III: publiccation practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2011; 54: S346-S362.10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263)Search in Google Scholar

10. Wager E, Kleinert S. Why do we need international standards on responsible research publication for authors and editors? Journal of Global Health. 2013; 3(2): 1-7. Available at: http://jogh.org/documents/forthcoming/V1%20Wage r%20FINAL.pdf Accessed: Sept 12, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

11. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2011). Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research: Authorship and Contributorship. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1 author.html Accessed: June 30, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

12. ICMJE. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals* - Updated December 2013. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf Accessed: Apr 7, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

13. Claxton LD. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud? Mutat. Res. 2005 Jan; 589(1): 17-30. 14 Steneck N, Mayer T. Singapore Statement on Research Integrity. Available at: http://www.singaporestatement.org/ Accessed: Apr 7, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

15. Council of Science Editors. CSEs White paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications. 2012 Update. Available at: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resourcelibrary/ editorial-policies/white-paper-on-publicationethics/ Accessed: Aug 14, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

16. Committee on Publication Ethics. Promoting integrity in research publication. Available at: http://publicationethics.org/ Accessed: Jul 20, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

17. American Medical Association. Manual of Style. Available at: http://www.amamanualofstyle.com/ Accessed: Jul 20, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

18. Smith E, Smith E, William-Jones B. Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: a review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multiauthor studies. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012; 18(2): 199-212.10.1007/s11948-011-9263-521312000Search in Google Scholar

19. Bhopal R, Rankin J, McColl E, et al. The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ. 1997; 314: 1009-12. Available at: http://www.bmj.com/content/314/7086/1009?ijkey=b d3d533c7224960ab169a64e4ecdf00808154574&keyt ype2=tf_ipsecsha Accessed: Sept 20, 2014Search in Google Scholar

20. Kakkar N. Authorship trends in the Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology: going the global way? - Correspondence. J Clin Pathol. 2004; 57: 670. Available at: http://jcp.bmj.com/content/57/6/670.1.full Accessed: Apr 20, 2014Search in Google Scholar

21. Marusic A, Bates T, Anic A, Marusic M. How the structure of contribution disclosure statements affects validity of authorship: a randomized study in a general medical journal. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2006 Jun; 22(6): 1035-44.10.1185/030079906X10488516862642Search in Google Scholar

22. Seeman JI, House MC. Influences on authorship issues: an evaluation of giving credit. Account. Res. 2010; 17(3): 146-69.Search in Google Scholar

23. Godlee F. More than 20% of medical articles have a “guest” author. British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition). 2009; 339(7722): p652. Available at: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/44376071/ more-than-20-medical-articles-have-a-guest-author Accessed: Sept 12, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

24. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Authorship and disputes. Available at: http://search.nih.gov/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&aff iliate=nih&query=Authorship+and+disputes&commi t.x=31&commit.y=6 Accessed: Jul 18, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

25. WAME. The Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing. Available at: http://www.wame.org/News/Details/2 Accessed: Jul 18, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

26. European Association of Science Editors. EASE Guidelines for authors and translators of scientific articles to be published in English. June 2013. Available at: http://www.ease.org.uk/sites/default/files/ease_guidel ines-june2013-english.pdf Accessed: Apr 8, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

27. The Office of Research Integrity. Annual Report 2010. Available at: http://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/ori_annual_report_ 2010.pdf Accessed: Jul 18, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

28. American Psychological Association (2011). Publication Practices and Responsible Authorship. Available at: http://www.apa.org/research/responsible/publication/ index.aspx Accessed: Aug 26, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

29. Science. General Information for Authors. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/contribinfo/p rep/gen_info.xhtml Accessed: Sept 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

30. PLoS ONE. Guidelines for Authors. Available at: http://www.plosone.org/static/guidelines Accessed: Sept 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

31. Nature. Authorship Policies. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v458/n7242/fu ll/4581078a.html Accessed: Sept 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

32. Masic I, Kujundzic E. Science editing of academic periodicals in biomedical and social sciences. Avicena. Sarajevo, 2013: 278.Search in Google Scholar

33. Montreal 4th World Conference on Research Integrity. Montreal Statement on Research Integrity. Available at: http://www.cehd.umn.edu/olpd/MontrealStatement.pdf Accessed: Sept 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

34. Wager E. Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters. Maturitas. 2009 Feb 20; 62(2): 109-12.10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.00119147308Search in Google Scholar

35. Katavić V. Responsible conduct of research. In: Marušić M (ed.) Principles of research in medicine. Zagreb: Medicinska naklada. 2008: 234-45.Search in Google Scholar

36. Albert T, Wager E. How to Handle Authorship Disputes: A Guide For New Researchers. The COPE Report 2003 (July 1). Available at: http://www.publicationethics.org/resources/guidelinesSearch in Google Scholar

37. Heitman E, Litewka S. International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urol. Oncol. 2011; 29(1): 104-8.Search in Google Scholar

38. Scheetz M. The Teaching Scholars Program: a proposed approach for promoting research integrity. In: Carmi A, Ferris L, Nachshon D, eds. Medicine and law - Theme issue on scientific misconduct. World Association for Medical Law. Medicine and Law. 2007; 26(3): 599-614.Search in Google Scholar

39. Wagena E.J. The scandal of unfair behaviour of senior faculty. J. Med. Ethics. 2005 May; 31(5): 308.10.1136/jme.2004.009308173414715863695Search in Google Scholar

40. Marusic A, Katavic V, Marusic M. Role of editors and journals in detecting and preventing scientific misconduct: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. In: Carmi A, Ferris L, Nachshon D, eds. Medicine and law - Theme issue on scientific misconduct. World Association for Medical Law. Medicine and Law. 2007; 26(3): 545-66.Search in Google Scholar