[Bauer Michael, Pitschel Diana and Philip Studinger. Governance Preferences of Sub-national Administrative Elites in the European Union, Lehrstuhl Politik und Verwaltung, Working Paper Series 2010, Vol. 4.]Search in Google Scholar
[Benz Arthur. Linking multiple demoi. Inter-parliamentary relations in the EU, Institut für Europäische Verfassungswissenschaften, IEV-Online, 2011/110.5771/9783845233109-267]Search in Google Scholar
[Borońska-Hryniewiecka Karolina. [a]. Regional parliaments and subsidiarity after Lisbon: Overcoming the regional blindness?, Democracy and Subsidiarity in the EU. National Parliaments, Regions and Civil Society in the Decision-Making Process, (red.) M. Cartabia, N. Lupo and A. Simoncini, ‘Il Mulino - Percorsi’, Series of Nova Universitas, 2013, pp. 337-364.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borońska-Hryniewiecka Karolina. [b]. Subnational parliaments in EU Policy-control. Explaining the variations across Europe. Robert Schuman Working Paper Series, 2013/38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borońska-Hryniewiecka Karolina. [c]. The role of regional and local authorities in EU development policies in the perspective of the Committee of the Regions. Multi-level governance revisited in the times of crisis. Studia Regionalne i lokalne 2013, vol 3 (53), pp. 21-38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruun Niklas and Andreas Bücker. European Economic, Employment and Social Policy, Critical assessment of the proposed Monti II regulation – more courage and strength needed to remedy the social imbalances. ETUI Policy Brief, N° 4/2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burrows Noreen, Carter Caitriona and Scott Andrew. Subsidiarity and the Draft Treaty. Discussion Paper for Sub Rosa 2004. [online].[accessed 19.05.2013] available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/1071/0003543.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Bursens, Peter, Maes Frederic and Vileyn Matthias. Playing the Next Level of the Multilevel Parliamentary Game. Let’s Add Subnational Parliaments to the Scene, Paper prepared for the Political Studies Association Specialist Group Territorial Politics Biennial Conference, 13 - 14 September 2012 Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christiansen Thomas and Pamela Lintner. The CoR after 10 Years. Lessons from the Past and Challenges for the Future. EIPAScope 2005, Vol. 1, pp. 7-13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooper Ian. A “Virtual Third Chamber” for the European Union? National Parliaments after the Treaty of Lisbon, West European Politics 2012, 35/3, pp. 441-465.10.1080/01402382.2012.665735]Search in Google Scholar
[De Wilde Pieter. Why the Early Warning Mechanism does not Alleviate the Democratic Deficit, OPAL Online Paper 2012, no. 6.10.2139/ssrn.2128463]Search in Google Scholar
[Duff Andrew. Subsidiarity within the European Community: a Federal Trust report. 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. White paper on European governance. 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fabbrini Federico and Katarzyna Granat. Yellow card, but no foul: The role of the national parliaments under the subsidiarity protocol and the Commission proposal for an EU regulation on the right to strike. Common Market Law Review 2013, Issue 1, pp. 115–14310.54648/COLA2013006]Search in Google Scholar
[Follesdal Andreas and Simon Hix. Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies 2006, Vol. 44. No. 3, pp. 533–62.10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hanberger Anders. Democratic governance and evaluation. Paper presented at the Sixth EES (European Evaluation Society) Conference in Berlin, September 30-October 2, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[Horsley Thomas. Subsidiarity and the European Court of Justice: Missing Pieces in the Subsidiarity Jigsaw? Journal of Common Market Studies 2012, Vol. 50, Issue 2, pp. 267-282.10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02221.x]Search in Google Scholar
[House of Commons. How much legislation comes from Europe? Research Paper 10/62, 13 October 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaczyński Maciej. Paper tigers or sleeping beauties? National Parliaments in the post-Lisbon European Political System. CEPS Special Report 2011.10.2139/ssrn.1756817]Search in Google Scholar
[Kiiver Philip. The Early Warning System for the Principle of Subsidiarity: Constitutional Theory and Empirical Reality, 2012, London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203127001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kousser Thad. Retrospective Voting and Strategic Behaviour in European Parliament Elections. Electoral Studies 2004, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1–2110.1016/S0261-3794(02)00030-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Moravcsik Andrew. Europe after the crisis. How to sustain a Common Currency. 91 Foreign Affairs, 54/2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nicolaïdis Kalypso. Our European Demoï-cracy: Is this Constitution a Third Way for Europe?‘ in Nikolaides, Kalypso & Weatherill Stephen. Whose Europe? National Models and the Constitution of the European Union, European Studies at Oxford Series 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Brenan John and Tapio Raunio. Deparliamentarisation and European Integration, in (eds.) J. O’Brennan, T. Raunio, National Parliaments within the Enlarged European Union. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007. pp.1-26.10.4324/9780203962121]Search in Google Scholar
[Palomares Amat Miguel. La participación del parlamento de Cataluña en la aplicación y el control del principio de subsidiariedad. Revista de Derecho Comuniatrio Europeo 2011, núm. 38, pp. 19-59.]Search in Google Scholar
[Popelier Patricia and Werner Vandenbruwaene. The Subsidiarity Mechanism as a Tool for Inter-Level Dialogue in Belgium: On ‘Regional Blindness’ and Co-operative Flaws. European Constitutional Law Review 2011. Vol 7. pp. 204-22810.1017/S157401961120004X]Search in Google Scholar
[Raunio Tapio. National Parliaments and European Integration: What we know and what we should know. ARENA - Centre of European Studies Working Paper, University of Oslo, 9/2009.10.1080/13572330903302430]Search in Google Scholar
[Reif Karlheinz and Hermann Schmitt. Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results, European Journal of Political Research, 1980, 8:1, 3–44.10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Scharpf Fritz Wilhelm. Governing Europe: effective and democratic? New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. ISBN: 978019829545710.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295457.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Scharpf Fritz Wilhelm. Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Preemption of Democracy. LEQS Annual Lecture Papers 2011, No. 36/201110.2139/ssrn.1852316]Search in Google Scholar
[Weatherill Stephen. The challenge of the regional dimension in the European Union. in: Weatherill, Stephen and Bernitz, Ulf (eds.): The role of regions and sub-national actors in Europe 2005, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp.1-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiler Joseph. Europe in crisis—on ‘political messianism’, ‘legitimacy’and the ‘rule of law’. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, December 2012, pp. 248-268.10.2139/ssrn.2255263]Search in Google Scholar