Preliminary Field Tests and Long-Term Monitoring as a Method of Design Risk Mitigation: A Case Study of Gdańsk Deepwater Container Terminal

1. Buca R., Mitrosz O.: Complex Geotechnical Engineering for Port of Gdansk Development – Gateway to Central-Eastern Europe. Proceedings of 13^th Baltic Sea Geotechnical Conference, Vilnius 2016, pp. 290-296.10.3846/13bsgc.2016.044Search in Google Scholar

2. Buca R., Mitrosz O.: Inżynieria geotechniczna a rozbudowa Portu Gdańsk (in Polish). Journal GDMT, October – December /4/2016/57, pp. 60-63.Search in Google Scholar

3. Chróścielewski J., Sabik A., Sobczyk B., Witkowski W.: Nonlinear FEM 2D failure onset prediction of composite shells based on 6-paramter shell theory. Journal Thin-Walled Structures 105, 2016, pp. 207-219.10.1016/j.tws.2016.03.024Search in Google Scholar

4. Code DIN 4125:1990. Ground anchorages. Design, construction and testing.Search in Google Scholar

5. Code PN-EN 1537:1999. Execution of special geotechnical work – Ground anchors.Search in Google Scholar

6. Code PN-EN 1997-1:2008. Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design – Part 1: General rules.Search in Google Scholar

7. DCT Gdańsk S.A.: Employer’s requirements. Gdańsk July 2014.Search in Google Scholar

8. Krasiński A.: Analiza jednostkowego oporu gruntu niespoistego wzdłuż pobocznicy i pod podstawą pala w zależności od średnicy pala oraz uziarnienia i stanu naprężenia w gruncie (in Polish). Doctoral Thesis, Gdańsk University of Technology, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

9. Miśkiewicz M., Meronk B., Brzozowski T., Wilde K.: Monitoring system of the road embankment. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering (in press).Search in Google Scholar

10. Miśkiewicz M., Pyrzowski Ł., Wilde K., Mitrosz O.: Technical monitoring system for a new part of Gdańsk Deepwater Container Terminal. Polish Maritime Research 2017, 24(S1), pp. 149-155. DOI: 10.1515/pomr-2017-0033.10.1515/pomr-2017-0033Search in Google Scholar

11. Miśkiewicz M., Okraszewska R., Pyrzowski Ł.: Composite footbridge – synergy effect in cooperation between universities and industry. ICERI2014: 7th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, ICERI Proceedings, 2014, pp. 2897-2903.Search in Google Scholar

12. Nicholson D., Tse C., Penny C.: The Observational Method in ground engineering – principles and applications. Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA) Report 185, London 1999.Search in Google Scholar

13. Ordinance of the Polish Ministry of Transport, Construction and Maritime Economy. Document no 2012.0.463 (in Polish), dated 25^th of April 2012.Search in Google Scholar

14. Ordinance of the Polish Ministry of Transport and Maritime Economy. Document no 1998.101.645 (in Polish), dated 1^st of June 1998.10.1080/07266472.1998.10878532Search in Google Scholar

15. Patel D., Nicholson D., Huybrechts N., Maertens J.: The observational method in geotechnics. Proceedings of XIV European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Madrid 2007, pp. 24-27.Search in Google Scholar

16. Peck R.B.: Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics. Journal Geotechnique 1969, 19(2), pp. 171-181.10.1680/geot.1969.19.2.171Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Pyrzowski, Ł., Miśkiewicz, M., Chróścielewski, J.: The effect of fishing basin construction on the behaviour of a footbridge over the port channel. Polish Maritime Research 2017, 24(S1), pp. 182-187. DOI: 10.1515/pomr-2017-003710.1515/pomr-2017-0037Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Topolnicki M., Buca R.: Możliwości zastosowania modelowania BIM w geotechnice (in Polish). Proceedings of seminar IBDiM i PZWFS „Głębokie Wykopy”, Warsaw 2016.Search in Google Scholar

19. Topolnicki M.: Ryzyko związane ze wzmacnianiem gruntu za pomocą kolumn o różnej sztywności (in Polish). Proceedings of XXVIII Ogólnopolskie Warsztaty Pracy Projektanta Konstrukcji, Wisła 2013.Search in Google Scholar