Open Access

Auto Mission Planning System Design for Imaging Satellites and Its Applications in Environmental Field

Polish Maritime Research's Cover Image
Polish Maritime Research
Special Issue Title: Marine Processes Studies and Marine Engineering

Cite

1. J. C. Li, Album of world satellites in orbit, Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1-32. ( In Chinese) (2014).Search in Google Scholar

2. B. N. Zhang, Survey on technical development of optical remote sensor on Chinese resource satellite, Chinese Space Science and Space Exploration Society of Professional Committee of Twenty-Sixth National Symposium on Space Exploration, 327-333(In Chinese) (2013).Search in Google Scholar

3. S. Baek, S. Han, K. Cho, et al., “Development of a scheduling algorithm and GUI for autonomous satellite missions.” Acta Astronaut. 68(7), 1396-1402 (2011).10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.08.011Search in Google Scholar

4. C. Pralet, G. Verfaillie. “Using Constraint Networks on Timelines to Model and Solve Planning and Scheduling Problems,” in ICAPS 8, 272-279 (2008).Search in Google Scholar

5. L. Shumin, Z. Zheng, C. Kai-Yuan. Robust task scheduling of multi-satellite parallel test. Control Conference (CCC), 2011 30th Chinese. IEEE, 2152-2157 (2011).Search in Google Scholar

6. S. Chien, R. Sherwood, D. Tran, et al., “Using autonomy flight software to improve science return on Earth Observing One,” J. Aeros. Comp, Inf. Commun. 2(4), 196-216 (2005).10.2514/1.12923Search in Google Scholar

7. S. J. Delany, S. Ontañón. Case-based reasoning research and development, 8th International Conference on Case- Based Reasoning. Washinton, USA. 20-23 (2009).Search in Google Scholar

8. Z. Lian, Y. Tan, Y. Xu, Static and Dynamic Models of Observation Toward Earth by Agile Satellite Coverage, Proceedings of International Workshop on Planning and Scheduling for Space. Darmstadt, Germany: ESOC. 1-6 (2011).Search in Google Scholar

9. R. L. Sherwood, S. Chien, D. Tran et al., Intelligent systems in space: the EO-1 Autonomous Sciencecraft. Pasadena, CA: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2005).Search in Google Scholar

10. H. J. You, W. N. Chen, X. G. Zhou et al., “Scalable architecture model for Spacecraft‘s electronic system,” Syst. Eng. Electron. 35(2):263-269 (2013) (In Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

11. S. Laubach. Calculation of Operations Efficiency Factors for Mars Surface Missions, SpaceOps 2014, Pasadena, CA. AAIA, 1778-1786 (2014).10.2514/6.2014-1778Search in Google Scholar

12. M. L. Pinedo, Scheduling: theory, algorithms, and systems. Springer Science & Business Media, 252-374 (2012).Search in Google Scholar

13. R. Knight, G. Rabideau, S. Chien et al. “Casper: Space exploration through continuous planning,” Intelligent Systems, IEEE 16(5), 70-75 (2001).Search in Google Scholar

14. S. Chien, D. Tran, G. Rabideau et al., “Planning Operations of the Earth Observing Satellite EO-1: Representing and reasoning with spacecraft operations constraints,” ( 2009).Search in Google Scholar

15. F. Ip, J. M. Dohm, V. R. Baker et al., “Flood detection and monitoring with the Autonomous Sciencecraft Experiment onboard EO-1,” Remote Sens. Env. 101(4), 463-481 (2006).10.1016/j.rse.2005.12.018Search in Google Scholar

16. G. Rabideau, R. Knight, S. Chien, A. Fukunaga, A. Govindjee, Iterative Repair Planning for Spacecraft Operations in the ASPEN System, International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence Robotics and Automation in Space, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, (1999).Search in Google Scholar

17. B. Zhukov, E. Lorenz, D. Oertel et al., “Spaceborne detection and characterization of fires during the bi-spectral infrared detection (BIRD) experimental small satellite mission (2001-2004),” Remote Sens. Env. 100(1), 29-51 (2006).10.1016/j.rse.2005.09.019Search in Google Scholar

18. G. Ruecker, E. Lorenz, A. A. Hoffmann et al., High Resolution Active Fire Monitoring for Global Change Analysis: The Upcoming FireBIRD Satellite Mission, The 5th International Wildland Fire Conference, Sun City, South Africa. 134-144 (2011).Search in Google Scholar

19. W. Jiang, H. C. Hao, Y. J. Li, “Review of task scheduling research for the Earth observing satellites,” Syst. Eng. Electron. 35(9):1878-1885 (2013) ( In Chinese ).Search in Google Scholar

20. M. A. Gleyzes, L. Perret, P. Kubik, “Pleiades system architecture and main performances,” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci, 39: B1, 537-542 (2012).10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B1-537-2012Search in Google Scholar

21. D. Greslou, F. de Lussy, J. M. Delvit, et al., “Pleiades-HR innovative techniques for geometric image quality commissioning,” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci, 39: B1, 543-547 (2012).10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B1-543-2012Search in Google Scholar

22. G. Beaumet, G. Verfaillie, M. C. Charmeau, “Autonomous planning for an agile earth-observing satellite,” in iSAIRAS, pp. 1-6, (2008).Search in Google Scholar

23. M. K. Griffin, K. B. Hsiao-hua, D. Mandl et al., Cloud cover detection algorithm for EO-1 Hyperion imagery, AeroSense 2003. International Society for Optics and Photonics 483-494 (2003).10.1117/12.487297Search in Google Scholar

24. Y. H. Guo. Research on the key technology of combining multiple types of EOSs with multiple types of data transmitting resources. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2009. (In Chinese)Search in Google Scholar

25. A. G. Davies, S. Chien, D. Tran et al., “The NASA Volcano Sensor Web, advanced autonomy and the remote sensing of volcanic eruptions: a review,” Geological Society, London, Special Publications 426, SP426. 3 (2015).Search in Google Scholar

26. G. Beaumet, G. Verfaillie, M. C. Charmeau, “Feasibility of autonomous decision making on board an agile earthobserving satellite,” Comput. Intelligence, 27(1): 123-139, (2011).10.1111/j.1467-8640.2010.00375.xSearch in Google Scholar

27. D. Izzo, L. Pettazzi, “Autonomous and distributed motion planning for satellite swarm,” J. Guid. Control Dynam. 30(2), 449-459 (2007).10.2514/1.22736Search in Google Scholar

28. Y. Long, P. Wang, Z. Zhang et al., “Uplink Task Scheduling Model and Heuristic Algorithm of Satellite Navigation System,” Adv. Inf. Sci. Service Sci. 4(16), 450-461 (2012).10.4156/aiss.vol4.issue16.43Search in Google Scholar

29. G. Beaumet, “Continuous planning for the control of an autonomous agile satellite,” ICAPS 2006, 13 (2006).Search in Google Scholar

30. N. Chen, X. Wang, X. Yang, “A direct registry service method for sensors and algorithms based on the process model,” Comp. Geosci. 56, 45-55 (2013).Search in Google Scholar

31. D. S. Qiu, J. J. Wang, C. B. Wu et al., “Emergency scheduling method of earth observation satellites based on task merging,” Syst. Eng. Electron. 35(7), 1430-1437 (2013) ( In Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

32. S. Bernardini, M. Fox, D. Long, et al. Autonomous Search and Tracking via Temporal Planning, ICAPS. 481-489 (2013).10.1609/icaps.v23i1.13582Search in Google Scholar

33. S. A. Chien, R. Knight, A. Stechert et al., Using Iterative Repair to Improve the Responsiveness of Planning and Scheduling, AIPS. 300-307 (2000).Search in Google Scholar

34. G. Beaumet, G. Verfaillie, M. C. Charmeau, “Decisionmaking on-board an autonomous agile Earth-observing satellite,” ICAPS (SPARK) (2008).Search in Google Scholar

35. A. Altinok, D. R. Thompson, B. Bornstein et al., “Real-Time Orbital Image Analysis Using Decision Forests, with a Deployment Onboard the IPEX Spacecraft,” J. Field Robot (2015).10.1002/rob.21627Search in Google Scholar

36. M. Lemaître, G. Verfaillie, “Interaction between reactive and deliberative tasks for on-line decision-making”, in International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS’07 Workshop on Planning and Plan Execution for Real-World Systems, Providence, RI, USA (2007).Search in Google Scholar

37. P. F. Maldague, A. Y. Ko, JIT planning: an approach to autonomous scheduling for space missions, Aerospace Conference, 1999. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE. IEEE, 1: 339-349 (1999).Search in Google Scholar

38. R. Knight, S. Chien, Producing Large Observation Campaigns Using Compressed Problem Representations, International Workshop on Planning and Scheduling for Space, Space Telescope Science Institute, Maryland (2006). Search in Google Scholar

39. S. Chien, R. Knight, G. Rabideau, An empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of local search for replanning. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2001).10.1007/3-540-45612-0_5Search in Google Scholar

40. E. Gat, “On three-layer architectures,” Artificial intelligence and mobile robots, 195: 210 (1998).Search in Google Scholar

41. Adnan, F.A.F.; Hamylton, S.M.; Woodroffe, C.D., Surf- Swash Interactions on a Low-Tide Terraced Beach, Journal of Coastal Research, SI75, 348-352 (2016).10.2112/SI75-070.1Search in Google Scholar

42. D. R. Thompson, A. Altinok, B. Bornstein, et al., “Onboard machine learning classification of images by a cubesat in Earth orbit,” AI Matters, 4, 38-40 (2015).Search in Google Scholar

43. Zieja, M; Wazny, M. A model for service life control of selected device systems. Polish Maritime Research, 21(2) 45-49 (2014). 10.2478/pomr-2014-0018Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-7429
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Engineering, Introductions and Overviews, other, Geosciences, Atmospheric Science and Climatology, Life Sciences