The reliance on inclusive living thing in inductive inference among 5-year-olds: the role of access to nature and the size of receptive vocabulary

Anggoro, F. K., Waxman, S.R. & Medin, D. L. (2008). Naming practices and the acquisition of key biological concepts: Evidence from English and Indonesian. Psychological Science, 19, 314-319.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02086.xSearch in Google Scholar

Backscheider, A. G., Schatz, M., & Gelman, S. A. (1993). Preschoolers’ ability to distinguish living kinds as a function of regrowth. Child Development, 64, 1242-1257.10.2307/1131337Search in Google Scholar

Barrett, H. C. (2001). On the functional origins of essentialism. Mind and Society, 3, 1-30.10.1007/BF02512073Search in Google Scholar

Bartoszeck, A. B., Cosmo, C. R., da Silva, B. R., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2015). Concepts of Plants Held by Young Brazilian Children: An Exploratory Study. European Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 105-117.10.12973/eu-jer.4.3.105Search in Google Scholar

Booth, A. E. (2009). Causal supports for early word learning. Child Development, 80(4), 1243-1250. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01328.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371-99.10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233Search in Google Scholar

Brulé, L., Labrell, F., Megalakaki, O., Fouquet, N., & Caillies S. (2014). Children's justifications of plants as living things between 5 and 7 years of age. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 532-545.10.1080/17405629.2014.881283Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, N. A., Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., & Jackson, R. B. (2008). Biology. Eighth edition. San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings.Search in Google Scholar

Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Search in Google Scholar

Coley, J. D. (2012). Where the Wild Things Are: Informal Experience and Ecological Reasoning. Child Development, 83: 992-1006. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-8624.2012.01751.xSearch in Google Scholar

Coley, J. D., Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (1997). Does rank have its privilege? Inductive inferences within folkbiological taxonomies. Cognition, 64, 73-112.10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00017-6Search in Google Scholar

Craighero, L., Leo, I., Umiltà, C., & Simion, F. (2011). Newborns’ preference for goal-directed actions. Cognition, 120, 26-32.10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.011Search in Google Scholar

Csibra, G., Biro, S., Koos, O., & Gergely, G. (2003). One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively. Cognitive Science, 27(1), 111-133.10.1207/s15516709cog2701_4Search in Google Scholar

Czapiński, J., & Panek, T. (Eds) (2015). Social diagnosis 2015. Objective and subjective quality of life in Poland. Warszawa: Rada Monitoringu SpołecznegoSearch in Google Scholar

Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A., & Weisleder, A. (2013). SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science, 16, 234-248. doi:10.1111/desc.12019Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, A. V., Godwin, K. E., & Matlen, B. J. (2015). Development of inductive generalization with familiar categories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22: 1149. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0816-5Search in Google Scholar

Geerdts, M. S., Van de Walle, G. A., & LoBue, V. (2015). Daily animal exposure and children’s biological concepts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 132-146.10.1016/j.jecp.2014.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. (1990). The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird: Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 26, 796-804.10.1037/0012-1649.26.5.796Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., & Kremer, K. E. (1991). Understanding natural cause: Children’s explanations of how objects and their properties originate. Child Development, 62, 396-414.10.2307/1131012Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A,. & Markman, E. M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23, 183-209.10.1016/0010-0277(86)90034-XSearch in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., & O’Reilly, A. W. (1988). Children’s inductive inferences within superordinate categories: The role of language and category structure. Child Development, 59, 876-887.10.2307/1130255Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., & Opfer J. E. (2002). Development of the Animate-Inanimate Distinction. In: U. Goswami (Ed) Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (pp. 151-166). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: Early understanding of the nonobvious. Cognition, 38, 213-244.10.1016/0010-0277(91)90007-QSearch in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg R. F., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Developmental ''roots'' in mature biological knowledge. Psychological Science, 20: 480-487.Search in Google Scholar

Haman E., & Fronczyk K. (2012). Obrazkowy Test Słownikowy - Rozumienie (OTSR), Gdańsk: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych i Pedagogicznych.Search in Google Scholar

Hatano, G., Siegler, R. S., Richards, D. D., Inagaki, K., Stavy, R., & Wax, N. (1993). The development of biological knowledge: A multi-national study. Cognitive Development, 8, 47-62.10.1016/0885-2014(93)90004-OSearch in Google Scholar

Inagaki, K. (1990). The effects of raising animals on children's biological knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(2), 119-129.10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00827.xSearch in Google Scholar

Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (1996). Young children’s recognition of commonalities between animals and plants. Child Development, 67, 2823-2840.10.2307/1131754Search in Google Scholar

Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Young children's naive thinking about the biological world. New York, NY: Psychology PressSearch in Google Scholar

Keil, F. (1989). Concepts, kinds and conceptual development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kerbe, W. (2016). What is Life-in Everyday Understanding? A Focus Group Study on Lay Perspectives on the Term Life. Artificial Life, 22, 119-133.10.1162/ARTL_a_00181Search in Google Scholar

Laurendeau, M., & Pinard, A. (1962). Causal thinking in the child. New York, NY: International Universities Press.Search in Google Scholar

Leddon, E. M., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D.L. (2008). Unmasking “alive:” Children’s appreciation of a concept linking all living things. Journal of Cognition and Development. 9, 461-473.Search in Google Scholar

Longbottom S. E., & Slaughter V. (2016). Direct Experience With Nature and the Development of Biological Knowledge. Early Education and Development, 27, 1145-1158.10.1080/10409289.2016.1169822Search in Google Scholar

Machery, E. (2012). Why I stopped worrying about the definition of life… and why you should as well. Synthese, 185, 145-164.10.1007/s11229-011-9880-1Search in Google Scholar

Majcher, I., & Suska-Wróbel, R. (2005). Zasób osobistej wiedzy przyrodniczej dzieci dziewięcioletnich. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.Search in Google Scholar

Mandler, J. M., & McDonough, L. (1996). Drinking and driving don’t mix: Inductive generalization in infancy. Cognition, 59(3), 307-335.10.1016/0010-0277(95)00696-6Search in Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111, 960-983.Search in Google Scholar

Medin, D. L., Waxman, S. R., Woodring, J., & Washinawatok, K. (2010). Human-centeredness is not a universal feature of young children's reasoning: Culture and experience matter when reasoning about biological entities. Cognitive Development, 25(3), 197-207.10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Miller, P., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2013). Early academic skills and childhood experiences across the urban-rural continuum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 234-248.10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.12.005Search in Google Scholar

Muzyka-Furtak, E., & Haman, E. (2015). Polish Picture Vocabulary Test - Comprehension (OTSR) in logopedic diagnosis of hearing-impaired children. Logopedia, 43-44, 83-100.Search in Google Scholar

Neuman, S. B., Newman, E. H., & Dwyer, J. (2011). Educational Effects of a Vocabulary Intervention on Preschoolers' Word Knowledge and Conceptual Development: A Cluster-Randomized Trial. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 249-272. doi:10.1598/RRQ.46.3.3Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, S. P., & Gelman, S. A. (2002). Four and 6-year olds’ biological concept of death: The case of plants. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 495-513.10.1348/026151002760390918Search in Google Scholar

Opfer, J. E., & Siegler, R. S. (2004). Revisiting preschoolers’ living things concept: A microgenetic study of conceptual change in basic biology. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 301-332.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world (J. and A. Tomlinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace and Co.Search in Google Scholar

Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2008). Effects of keeping animals as pets on children's concepts of vertebrates and invertebrates. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 431-449.10.1080/09500690701206686Search in Google Scholar

Ross, N., Medin, D. L., Coley, J. D., & Atran, S. (2003). Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cognitive Development, 18, 25-47.10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00142-9Search in Google Scholar

Rybska, E., Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Sajkowska Z. A. (in press). Children’s ideas about the internal structure of trees: cross-age studies. Journal of Biological Education, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.125750010.1080/00219266.2016.1257500Search in Google Scholar

Samorzad.pap.pl. Ranking najbogatsze i najbiedniejsze gminy 2016. http://samorzad.pap.pl/depesze/redakcyjne.praca.akty/161553/Ranking--Najbogatsze-i-najbiedniejsze-gminy-2016--czesc-1-1-499-Retrieved 27.1.2017Search in Google Scholar

Simion, F., Regolin, L., & Bulf, H. (2008). A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 809-813.10.1073/pnas.0707021105Search in Google Scholar

Stavy, R., & Wax, N. (1989). Children's conceptions of plants as living things. Human Development, 32, 88-94.10.1159/000276367Search in Google Scholar

Sutherland, S. L., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Inductive generalization relies on category representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 632-636.10.3758/s13423-015-0951-zSearch in Google Scholar

Tarlowski, A. (2006). If it’s an animal it has axons: Experience and culture in preschool children’s reasoning about animates. Cognitive Development, 21, 249-265.10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Taverna, A. S., Waxman, S. A., Medin, D. L., Moscoloni, N., & Peralta, O. A. (2014). Naming the living things: Linguistic, experiential and cultural factors in Wichí and Spanish speaking children. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 14, 213-233.10.1163/15685373-12342122Search in Google Scholar

Venville, G. (2004). Young children learning about living things: A case study of conceptual change from ontological and social perspectives. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 449-480.10.1002/tea.20011Search in Google Scholar

Waxman, S. R. (2005). Why is the concept “living thing” so elusive? Concepts, languages, and the development of folkbiology. In W. Ahn, R.L. Goldstone, B.C. Love, A.B. Markman, & P. Wolff (Eds.), Categorization Inside and Outside the Laboratory: Essays in Honor of Douglas L. Medin. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, W., Goodale, E., & Chen, J. (2014). How contact with nature affects children’s biophilia, biophobia and conservation attitude in China. Biological Conservation, 177, 109-116. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.011Search in Google Scholar