Open Access

Collaborative Relationships Among Couples: Frames of Interaction During Everyday Household Activities


Cite

Arcidiacono, F. (2007). Studying the practice of cooperation and collaboration within an international research project on the everyday lives of families. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 41 (2), 139-153.10.1007/s12124-007-9016-9Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F. (2010). The ethnographic observation of the everyday life in Italy: Collaborative interactions among working couples. In C.L. Goossens (Ed.), Family Life: Roles, Bonds, and Impact (pp. 99-118). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F. (2015). Argumentation and reflexivity. In G. Marsico, R. Andrisano- Ruggieri, & S. Salvatore (Eds.), Reflexivity and Psychology (pp. 196-193). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F., Baucal, A., & Budjevac, N. (2011). Doing qualitative research: The analysis of talk-in-interaction. In A. Baucal, F. Arcidiacono, & N. Budjevac (Eds.), Studying interaction in different contexts: A qualitative view (pp. 17-45). Belgrade: Institute of Psychology.Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F., Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., & Bradbury, T.N. (2010). Modalita interattive nella divisione del lavoro domestico: uno studio etnografico su famiglie italiane e statunitensi [Interactional modalities within the division of household labor: An ethnographic study among Italian and US families]. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 10 (1-2), 85-105.Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F. & Pontecorvo, C. (2004). Piu metodi per la pluridimensionalita della vita familiare [Diverse methods for a multidimensional study of family life]. Ricerche di Psicologia, 27 (3), 103-118.Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F. & Pontecorvo, C. (2010a). Where and how family members spend time at home? A quantitative analysis of the observational tracking on the everyday lives of Italian families. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4 (2), 113-129.10.5172/mra.2010.4.2.113Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F. & Pontecorvo, C. (2010b). The discursive construction of the fathers’ positioning within family participation frameworks. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25 (4), 449-472.10.1007/s10212-010-0024-7Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, F., Pontecorvo, C., & Greco Morasso, S. (2009). Family conversations: The relevance of context in evaluating argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9 (2), 79-92.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, G.S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, E. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale [Problems of general linguistics]. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2013). Invoking the authority of feelings as a strategic maneuver in family mealtime conversations. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23 (3), 206-224.10.1002/casp.2113Search in Google Scholar

Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2014). “You must eat the salad because it is nutritious”. Argumentative strategies adopted by parents and children in food-related discussions at mealtimes. Appetite, 73 (1), 81-94.Search in Google Scholar

Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2015). Beyond conflicts. Origin and types of issues leading to argumentative discussions during family mealtimes. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3 (2), 263-288.10.1075/jlac.3.2.02bovSearch in Google Scholar

Bradbury, T.N. (Ed.) (1998). The Developmental Course of Marital Dysfunction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511527814Search in Google Scholar

Bradbury, T.N. & Karney, B.R. (1993). Longitudinal study of marital interaction and dysfunction: Review and analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 13 (1), 15-27.10.1016/0272-7358(93)90005-7Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, K. (1988). Women and Home-Based Work: The Unspoken Contract. New York, NY: Holt.Search in Google Scholar

Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62 (4), 1208-1233.10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.xSearch in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Etelamaki, M. (2014). On divisions of labor in request and offer environments. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in Social Interaction (pp. 115-144). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Des Rivieres-Pigeon, C. (2002). Division of domestic work and psychological distress 1 year after childbirth: A comparison between France, Quebec and Italy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 12 (6), 397-409.10.1002/casp.697Search in Google Scholar

de Vaus, D. (Ed.) (2009). Family-work balance. Special issue. Journal of Family Studies, 15 (2), 118-187.Search in Google Scholar

Dunlap, E., Golub, A., & Benoit, E. (2010). The invisible partners: Cohabiting males as ‘caring daddies’ in inner-city ‘mother-only’ households. In C.L. Goossens (Ed.), Family Life: Roles, Bonds, and Impact (pp. 33-54). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Emigh, R.J. (2000). The gender division of labour: The case of Tuscan smallholders. Continuity and Change, 15 (1), 117-137.10.1017/S0268416099003501Search in Google Scholar

Goodnow, J.J. (1988). Children’s household work: Its nature and functions. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (1), 5-26.10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.5Search in Google Scholar

Goodnow, J.J. (1989). Work in households: An overview and three studies. In D. Ironmonger (Ed.), Households Work (pp. 38-58). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Goodnow, J.J. & Delaney, S. (1989). Children’s household work: Task differences, styles of assignment, and links to family relationships. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 10 (2), 209-225.10.1016/0193-3973(89)90005-1Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2006). Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves. Text & Talk, 26 (4-5), 443-461.10.1515/TEXT.2006.018Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, M.H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/ response sequences. Text & Talk, 26 (4-5), 515-543.10.1515/TEXT.2006.021Search in Google Scholar

Hochschild, A. (1997). Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.Search in Google Scholar

Hochschild, A. & Machung, A. (1989). The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York, NY: Viking.Search in Google Scholar

Hollway, W. (1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, L. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 227-263). London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, M.D., Cohan, C.L., Davila, J., Lawrence, E., Rogge, R. D., Karney, B.R., Sullivan, K.T., & Bradbury, T.N. (2005). Problem-solving skills and affective expressions as predictors of change in marital satisfaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73 (1), 15-27.10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.15Search in Google Scholar

Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., & Bradbury, T.N. (2004). Working relationships: Communicative patterns and strategies among couples in everyday life (Working Paper n. 28). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center on Everyday Lives of Families.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., Bradbury, T.N., & Arcidiacono, F. (2005). Collaboration and conflict: Insights into the division of household labor among working couples in the United States and Italy (Working Paper n. 36). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center on Everyday Lives of Families.Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, G.H. (1995). Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes, 19 (1), 111-131.10.1080/01638539109544907Search in Google Scholar

Oropeza-Escobar, M. (2011). Framing and collaboration in storytelling events: Forgetfulness, reflexivity and word search. Pragmatics, 21 (2), 213-230.10.1075/prag.21.2.03oroSearch in Google Scholar

Pasch, L.A. & Bradbury, T.N. (1998). Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66 (2), 219-230.10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.219Search in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In M.J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pontecorvo, C. & Arcidiacono, F. (2014). Social interactions in families and schools as contexts for the development of spaces of thinking. In T. Zittoun & A. Iannaccone (Eds.), Activity of Thinking in Social Spaces (pp. 83-97). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Riedinger, K. (2012). Family connections: Family conversations in informal learning environments. Childhood Education, 88 (2), 125-127.10.1080/00094056.2012.662136Search in Google Scholar

Rigotti, E. & Greco Morasso, S. (2011). Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: The procedural and material components. Argumentation, 24 (4), 489-512.Search in Google Scholar

Rossi, G. (2012). Bilateral and unilateral requests: The use of imperatives and Mi X? interrogatives in Italian. Discourse Processes, 49 (9), 426-458.10.1080/0163853X.2012.684136Search in Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. & Valsiner, J. (2009). Idiographic Science on its Way: Towards Making Sense of Psychology. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, S. Strout, & J. Clegg (Eds.), Yearbook of Idiographic Science. Volume 2 (pp. 9-19). Rome: Firera & Liuzzo Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, J. A. (2000). Daily Stressors in Families (Working Paper). Chicago, IL: Sloan Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester: Wiley- Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Stemplewska-Zakowicz, K., Zalewski, B., Suszek, H., Kobylinska, D., & Szymczyk, B. (2014). The discursive mind model. Psychology of Language and Communication, 18 (1), 1-21.10.2478/plc-2014-0001Search in Google Scholar

Wong, J. (2000). Repetition in conversation: A look at “first and second sayings”. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33 (4), 407-424.10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_03Search in Google Scholar

Zinken, J. & Borek, A. (2012). Working side by side? Interaction and interview data in research on household conflicts. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9 (2), 99-113.10.1080/14780880903342295Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-8506
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Social Sciences, Psychology, Applied Psychology