Only Cheap Talk after All? New Experimental Psychological Findings on the Role of Verbal Proficiency in Mate Choice

Apicella, C.L. & Feinberg, D.R. (2009). Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter-gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 276 (1659), 1077-1082.Search in Google Scholar

Bratko, D. (1996). Twin study of verbal and spatial abilities. Personality and Individual Differences, 21 (4), 621-624.10.1016/0191-8869(96)00091-8Search in Google Scholar

Brinsmead-Stockham, K., Johnston, L., Miles, L., & Macrae, C.N. (2008). Female sexual orientation and menstrual influences on person perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (3), 729-734.10.1016/j.jesp.2007.05.003Search in Google Scholar

Brown, D.E. (1991). Human Universals. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Burling, R. (1986). The selective advantage of complex language. Ethology and Sociobiology, 7 (1), 1-16.10.1016/0162-3095(86)90011-7Search in Google Scholar

Buss, D.M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses testing in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12 (01), 1-14.10.1017/S0140525X00023992Search in Google Scholar

Buss, D.M. (2016). Evolutionary Psychology. The New Science of the Mind (5th Edition). New York: Routledge Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Buss, D.M. & Schmitt, D. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100 (2), 204-232.10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204Search in Google Scholar

Ceci, S.J. & Williams, W.M. (1997). Schooling, intelligence, and income. American Psychologist, 52 (10), 1051-1058.10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1051Search in Google Scholar

Clark, R.D. & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 2 (1), 39-55.10.1300/J056v02n01_04Search in Google Scholar

Curtin, R., Presser, S., & Singer, E. (2000). The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64 (4), 413-428.10.1086/318638Search in Google Scholar

Darwin, C.R. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Search in Google Scholar

Darwin, C.R. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Search in Google Scholar

Dissanayake, E. (2009). The artification hypothesis and its relevance to cognitive science, evolutionary aesthetics, and neuroaesthetics. Cognitive Semiotics, 5, 148-173.10.1515/cogsem.2009.5.fall2009.136Search in Google Scholar

Dissanayake, E. (2014). A bona fide ethological view of art: The artification hypothesis. In C. Sutterlin, W. Schiefenhovel, C. Lehmann, J. Forster, & G. Apfelauer (Eds.), Art as Behaviour: An Ethological Approach to Visual and Verbal Art, Music and Architecture (pp. 42-60). Oldenburg: Bis.Search in Google Scholar

Dunbar, R.I.M. (1996). Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. London: Faber and Faber.Search in Google Scholar

Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M., & Schmitt, M. (2010). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden [Statistics and research methods]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.Search in Google Scholar

Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112 (1), 125-139.10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.125Search in Google Scholar

Fernandez-Duque, E., Valeggia, C.R., & Mendoza, S.P. (2009). The biology of paternal care in human and nonhuman primates. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38 (1), 115-130.10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164334Search in Google Scholar

Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th Edition). London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Fitch, W.T. (2004). Kin selection and “mother tongues”. A neglected component in language evolution. In D.K. Oller & U. Griebel (Eds.), Evolution of Communication Systems. A Comparative Approach (pp. 275-296). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gangestad, S.W. & Simpson, J.A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58 (1), 69-96.10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00908.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gangestad, S.W. & Simpson, J.A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23 (4), 573-644.10.1017/S0140525X0000337XSearch in Google Scholar

Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R.B., & Kenrick, D.T. (2006). Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: The effects of romantic motives on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (1), 63-76.10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.63Search in Google Scholar

Haselton, M.G. & Miller, G.F. (2006). Women’s fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Human Nature, 17 (1), 50-73.10.1007/s12110-006-1020-0Search in Google Scholar

Hussy, W. & Jain, A. (2002). Experimentelle Hypothesenprufung in der Psychologie [Experimental hypothesis testing in psychology]. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Search in Google Scholar

Hyde, J.S. & Linn, M.C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104 (1), 53-69.10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, L. (2000). Biolinguistics. Exploring the Biology of Language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605765Search in Google Scholar

Kanazawa, S. (2003). Why productivity fades with age: The crime-genius connection. Journal of Research in Personality, 37 (4), 257-272.10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00538-XSearch in Google Scholar

Kanazawa, S. (2007). Mating intelligence and general intelligence as independent constructs. In G. Geher & G.F. Miller (Eds.), Mating Intelligence. Sex, Relationships, and the Mind’s Reproductive System (pp. 283-309). New York: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, H.S. & Gangestad, S.W. (2005). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D.M. Buss (Ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (pp. 68-95). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Kemper, S. & Sumner, A. (2001). The structure of verbal abilities in young and older adults. Psychology & Aging, 16 (2), 312-322.10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.312Search in Google Scholar

Lange, B.P. (2011). Male proneness to verbal display production. Acta Linguistica, 5 (2), 97-104.Search in Google Scholar

Lange, B.P. (2012). Verbal proficiency as fitness indicator. Experimental and comparative research on the evolutionary psychology of language and verbal displays. Saarbrucken: Sudwestdeutscher Verlag fur Hochschulschriften.Search in Google Scholar

Lange, B.P. & Euler, H.A. (2014). Writers have groupies, too: High quality literature production and mating success. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 8 (1), 20-30.10.1037/h0097246Search in Google Scholar

Lange, B.P., Schwarz, S., & Euler, H.A. (2013). The sexual nature of human culture. The Evolutionary Review: Art, Science, Culture, 4 (1), 76-85.Search in Google Scholar

Lange, B.P., Schwarz, S., Zaretsky, E., & Euler, H.A. (2014). Sounding hot? Experimental research on verbal proficiency as a menstrual cycle-dependent female mate choice criterion. Acta Linguistica, 8 (3), 133-139.Search in Google Scholar

Lange, B.P., Zaretsky, E., & Euler, H.A. (2016). Pseudo names are more than hollow words: Sex differences in the choice of pseudonyms. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35 (3), 287-304.10.1177/0261927X15587102Search in Google Scholar

Lange, B.P., Zaretsky, E., Schwarz, S., & Euler, H.A. (2014). Words won’t fail: Experimental evidence on the role of verbal proficiency in mate choice. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33 (5), 482-499.10.1177/0261927X13515886Search in Google Scholar

Maestripieri, D. (1997). The evolution of communication. Language & Communication, 17 (3), 269-277.10.1016/S0271-5309(97)00009-8Search in Google Scholar

Mascie-Taylor, C.G.N. (1988). Assortative mating for psychometric characters. In C.G.N. Mascie-Taylor & A.J. Boyce (Eds.), Human Mating Patterns (pp. 61-82). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, G.F. (1998). How mate choice shaped human nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution. In C. Crawford & D. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology: Ideas, Issues, and Applications (pp. 87-130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, G.F. (2000a). The Mating Mind. How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. New York: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, G.F. (2000b). Mental traits as fitness indicators: Expanding evolutionary psychology’s adaptationism. In D. LeCroy & P. Moller (Eds.), Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Reproductive Behavior (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Volume 907) (pp. 62-74). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06616.xSearch in Google Scholar

Miller, G.F. (2002). How did language evolve? In H. Swain (Ed.), Big Questions in Science (pp. 79-90). London: Jonathan Cape.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, G.F. (2013). Mutual mate choice models as the red pill in Evolutionary Psychology: Long delayed, much needed, ideologically challenging, and hard to swallow. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 24 (3), 207-210.10.1080/1047840X.2013.817937Search in Google Scholar

Miller, G.F. & Todd, P.M. (1998). Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2 (5), 190-198.10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01169-3Search in Google Scholar

Penke, L. & Asendorpf, J.B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95 (5), 1113-1135.10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct. New York: Morrow.Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, S. & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13 (4), 707-784.10.1017/S0140525X00081061Search in Google Scholar

Puts, D.A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31 (3), 157-175.10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Ramsay, M.C. & Reynolds, C.R. (2003). Relations between intelligence and achievement test. In G. Goldstein & S.R. Beers (Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment (pp. 25-50). New York: John Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Re, D.E., O’Connor, J.J.M., Bennett, P.J., & Feinberg, D.R. (2012). Preferences for very low and very high voice pitch in humans. PLoS ONE, 7 (3), e32719.10.1371/journal.pone.0032719Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberg, J. & Tunney, R.J. (2008). Human vocabulary use as display. Evolutionary Psychology, 6 (3), 538-549.10.1177/147470490800600318Search in Google Scholar

Schwarz, S. & Hassebrauck, M. (2012). Sex and age differences in mate selection preferences. Human Nature, 23 (4), 447-466.10.1007/s12110-012-9152-xSearch in Google Scholar

Singer, E., van Hoewyk, J., & Maher, M.P. (2000). Experiments with incentives in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64 (2), 171-188.10.1086/317761Search in Google Scholar

Stromswold, K. (2001). The heritability of language: A review and metaanalysis of twin, adoption, and linkage studies. Language, 77 (4), 647-723.10.1353/lan.2001.0247Search in Google Scholar

Stromswold, K. (2005). Genetic specificity of linguistic heritability. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones (pp. 121-140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Trivers, R.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B.B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (pp. 136-179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Search in Google Scholar

Watson, D., Klohnen, E.C., Casillas, A., Nus Simms, E., Haig, J., & Berry, D. (2004). Match makers and deal breakers: analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 72 (5), 1029-1068.10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00289.xSearch in Google Scholar