Cite

Aaker, J.L. (2000). Accessibility or diagnosticity? Disentangling the infl uence of culture on persuasion processes and att itudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (4), 340-357.10.1086/209567Search in Google Scholar

Aaker, J.L. & Williams, P. (1998). Empathy versus pride: Th e infl uence of emotional appeals across cultures. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 241-261.10.1086/209537Search in Google Scholar

Carpenter, C.J. & Boster, F.J. (2009). Meta-analysis of the eff ectiveness of the disrupt-then-reframe compliance gaining technique. Communication Reports, 22 (2), 55-62. 10.1080/08934210903092590Search in Google Scholar

Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (5), 752-766.10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752Search in Google Scholar

Cialdini, R., Wosinska, W., Barrett , D., Butner, J., & Gornik-Durose, M. (1999). Compliance with a request in two cultures: Th e differential influence of social proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25 (10), 1242-1253.10.1177/0146167299258006Search in Google Scholar

Courbet, D. & Marchioli, A. (in press). Risques et communication de sante publique en contexte mediterraneen. Deux experimentations en region PACA. In F. Bernard & M. Durampart (Eds.), Savoirs en action, cultures et réseaux méditerranéens. Paris: CNRS editions.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, B.P. & Knowles, E.S. (1999). A disrupt-then-reframe technique of social infl uence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (2), 192-199.10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.192Search in Google Scholar

Dolinski, D. & Szczucka, K. (2012). Fear-then-relief-then argument: How to sell goods using the EDTR technique of social infl uence. Social Infl uence, 7 (3), 251-267.10.1080/15534510.2012.669987Search in Google Scholar

Dolinski, D. & Szczucka, K. (2013). Emotional disrupt-then-reframe technique of social infl uence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43 (10), 2031-2041.10.1111/jasp.12156Search in Google Scholar

Fayol, M. & Monteil, J.-M. (1988). Th e notion of script: From general to developmental and social psychology. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 8 (4), 335-361.Search in Google Scholar

Fennis, B.M., Das, E.H.H.J., & Pruyn, A.T.H. (2004). “If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffl e them with nonsense”: Extending the impact of the disruptthen- reframe technique of social infl uence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (3), 280-290.10.1207/s15327663jcp1403_9Search in Google Scholar

Fennis, B.M., Das, E.H.H.J., & Pruyn, A.T.H. (2006). Interpersonal communication and compliance: The disrupt-then-reframe technique in dyadic infl uence settings. Communication Research, 33 (2), 136-151.10.1177/0093650205285367Search in Google Scholar

Freedman, J.L. & Fraser, S.C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: Th e foot-inthe- door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 (2), 196-202.Search in Google Scholar

Guéguen, N. & Pascual, A. (2000). Evocation of freedom and compliance: Th e “but you are free of… ” technique. Current Research in Social Psychology, 5 (18), 264-270.Search in Google Scholar

Han, S. & Shavitt , S. (1994). Persuasion and culture: Advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30 (4), 326-350.10.1006/jesp.1994.1016Search in Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International diff erences in work-related values (Abridged). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Howell, D.C. (2008). Donnees categorielles et khi-carre. In D.C. Howell (Ed.), Méthodes statistiques en sciences humaines (pp. 139-172). Brussels: DeBoeck.Search in Google Scholar

Kardes, F.R., Fennis, B.M., Hirt, E.R., Tormala, Z.L., & Bullington, B. (2007). The role of the need for cognitive closure in the eff ectiveness of the disrupt-thenreframe influence technique. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 377-385. 10.1086/518541Search in Google Scholar

Kleinke, C. (1977). Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in fi eld sett ings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13 (3), 218-223.10.1016/0022-1031(77)90044-0Search in Google Scholar

Kraut, R.E. (1973). Eff ects of social labelling on giving to charity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9 (6), 551-562.10.1016/0022-1031(73)90037-1Search in Google Scholar

Lee, A.Y. & Labroo, A.A. (2004). Th e eff ect of conceptual and perceptual fl uency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (2), 151-165.10.1509/jmkr.41.2.151.28665Search in Google Scholar

Liberman, N. & Trope, Y. (1998). Th e role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (1), 5-18.10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5Search in Google Scholar

Meng, H. (2008). Social script theory and cross-cultural communication. Intercultural Communication Studies, 12 (1), 132-138.Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, A. & Valenzuela, A. (2005). How banner ads aff ect brand choice without click-through. In C.P. Haugtveldt, K.A. Machleit, & R.F. Yalch (Eds.), Online consumer psychology: understanding and influencing consumer behaviour in the virtual world (pp. 125-142). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Morling, B. & Lamoreaux, M. (2008). Measuring culture outside the head: A metaanalysis of individualism-collectivism in cultural products. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 199-221.10.1177/1088868308318260Search in Google Scholar

Pascual, A. & Guéguen, N. (2004). Cultural differences in altruistic behaviour: Quasi-replication of Uranowitz’ foot-in-the-door with implicit demand. Psychological Reports, 94 (3), 767-770.10.2466/pr0.94.3.767-770Search in Google Scholar

Pascual, A., Oteme, C., Samson, L., Wang, Q., Halimi-Falkowicz, S., Souchet, L., Girandola, F., Gueguen, N., & Joule, R.-V. (2012). Cross cultural investigation of compliance without pressure: the “you are free to… ” technique in France, Ivory Coast, Romania, Russia and China. Cross-Cultural Research: Th e Journal of Comparative Social Science, 46 (4), 394-416.10.1177/1069397112450859Search in Google Scholar

Petrova, P.K., Cialdini, R.B., & Sills, S.J. (2007). Consistency-based compliance across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43 (1), 104-111.10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.002Search in Google Scholar

Ranney, S. (1992). Learning a new script: An explanation of sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 13 (1), 25-50.10.1093/applin/13.1.25Search in Google Scholar

Schank, R.C. & Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An Inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Schwarz, N. & Clore, G.L. (1983). Mood, misatt ribution, and judgements of wellbeing: informative and directive functions of aff ective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (3), 513-523.10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513Search in Google Scholar

St Clair, R.N., Th ome-Williams, A.C., & Su, L. (2005). Th e role of social script theory in cognitive blending. Intercultural Communication Studies, 15 (2), 58-76.Search in Google Scholar

St. Clair, R.N. (2006). Th e framing of culture: Interdisciplinary essays on culture theory. Course available through Blackboard for Beijing Foreign Studies University students, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.Search in Google Scholar

Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal Construal. Psychological Review, 110 (3), 403-421. Vallacher, R.R. & Selz, K. (1991). Who’s to blame? Action identification in allocating responsibility for alleged rape. Social Cognition, 9 (2), 194-219.Search in Google Scholar

Vallacher, R.R., & Wegner, D.M. (1985). A theory of action identifi cation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Vallacher, R.R. & Wegner, D.M. (2012). Action identifi cation theory. In P.A.M.Search in Google Scholar

Van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Th eories of Social Psychology (pp. 327-348). Th ousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Wegner, D.M., Vallacher, R.R., Kiersted, G.W., & Dizadji, D. (1986). Action identifi cation in the emergence of social behaviour. Social Cognition, 4 (1), 18-38.10.1521/soco.1986.4.1.18Search in Google Scholar

Wegner, D.M., Vallacher, R.R., Macomber, G., Wood, R., & Arps, K. (1984). Th e emergence of action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (2), 269-279. 10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.269Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-8506
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Social Sciences, Psychology, Applied Psychology