Processing Fluency and Decision-Making: The Role of Language Structure

Alter, A.L. & Oppenheimer, D.M. (2006). Predicting short-term stock fl uctuations by using processing fl uency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103 (24), 9369-9372.10.1073/pnas.0601071103Search in Google Scholar

Alter, A.L., & Oppenheimer, D.M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fl uency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219-235.10.1177/1088868309341564Search in Google Scholar

Alter, A.L., Oppenheimer, D.M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R.N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive diffi culty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136 (4), 569-576.10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569Search in Google Scholar

Alter, A.L. & Oppenheimer, D.M. (2008). Eff ects of fl uency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle). Psychological Science, 19 (2), 161-167.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02062.xSearch in Google Scholar

Alter, A.L. & Oppenheimer, D.M. (2009). Suppressing secrecy through metacognitive ease: Cognitive fluency encourages self-disclosure. Psychological Science, 20 (11), 1414-1420.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02461.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bornstein, R.F. & D’Agostino, P.R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure eff ect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 (4), 545-552.10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545Search in Google Scholar

Brown, R. (1965). Social Psychology. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (1967). Truth and meaning. Synthese, 17 (1), 304-323.10.1007/BF00485035Search in Google Scholar

Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D.M., & Vaughan, E. (2011). Fortune favors the Bold (and the Italicized): Eff ects of disfl uency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118 (1), 111-115.10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.012Search in Google Scholar

Downing, P. (1977). On ‘basic levels’ and the categorization of objects in English discourse. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 3, 475-487.10.3765/bls.v3i0.2256Search in Google Scholar

Duchon, D., Dunegan, K.J., & Barton, S.L. (1989). Framing the problem and making decisions: Th e facts are not enough. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36 (1), 25-27.10.1109/17.19979Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49 (8), 709-724.10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In T. Millon & M.J. Lerner (Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology. Volume 5: Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 159-184). Search in Google Scholar

Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Erickson, T.D. & Matt son, M.E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20 (5), 540-551.10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90165-1Search in Google Scholar

Evans, J.S.B.T. (1984). Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 75 (4), 451-468.10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb01915.xSearch in Google Scholar

Evans, J.S.B.T. (1996). Deciding before you think: Relevance and reasoning in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 87 (2), 223-240.10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02587.xSearch in Google Scholar

Evans, J.S.B.T. (2010). Th inking Twice: Two Minds in one Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, J.S.B.T. & Over, D.E. (1996). Rationality and Reasoning. Hove: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, J.S.B.T. & Stanovich, K.E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8 (3), 223-241, 263-271.10.1177/1745691613483774Search in Google Scholar

Frankish, K. & Evans, J.S.B.T. (2009). The duality of mind: An historical perspective. In J.S.B.T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond (pp. 1-29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (4), 25-42.10.1257/089533005775196732Search in Google Scholar

Geeraerts, D. (1995). Cognitive linguistics. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman & J. Blommaert (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 111-116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (2007). Introducing Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 3-21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, J.H. (1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J.H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of Language (pp. 73-113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haiman, J. (1983). Iconic and economic motivation. Language, 59 (4), 781-819.10.2307/413373Search in Google Scholar

Jacoby, L.L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118 (2), 115-125.10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.115Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Kamas, E.N., Reder, L.M., & Ayers, M.S. (1996). Partial matching in the Moses Illusion: Response bias not sensitivity. Memory and Cognition, 24 (6), 687-699.10.3758/BF03201094Search in Google Scholar

Klein, G. (1999). Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff , G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff , G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Landsberg, M.E. (Ed.) (1995). Syntactic Iconicity and Linguistic Freezes: Th e Human Dimension. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110882926Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. (2007). Cognitive Grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 421-462). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Langacker, R.W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Levin, I.P., Schneider, S.L., & Gaeth, G.J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing eff ects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76 (2), 149-188.10.1006/obhd.1998.2804Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, S.C. (1995). Interactional biases in human thinking. In E.N. Goody (Ed.), Social Intelligence and Interaction: Expressions and Implications of the Social Bias in Human Intelligence (pp. 221-260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McGlone, M.S. & Tofi ghbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11 (5), 424-428.10.1111/1467-9280.00282Search in Google Scholar

Moray, N. (1967). Where is capacity limited? A survey and a model. Acta Psychologica, 27, 84-92.10.1016/0001-6918(67)90048-0Search in Google Scholar

Oppenheimer, D.M. & Frank, M.F. (2007). A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: Effects of perceptual fluency on categorization. Cognition, 106 (3), 1178-1194.Search in Google Scholar

Park, H. & Reder, L.M. (2003). Moses illusion. In R.F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive Illusions (pp. 275-292). New York: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Posner, R. (1986). Iconicity in syntax: Th e natural order of attributes. In P. Bouissac, M. Herzfeld, & R. Posner (Eds.), Iconicity: Essays on the Nature of Culture (pp. 305-337). Tübingen: Stauff enburg Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, C.S. (1982). Th e Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition. Volumes 1: Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, C.S. (1998). Th e Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Volume 2: Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Posner, M.I. & Snyder, C.R.R. (1975). Att ention and cognitive control. In R.L. Solso (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: Th e Loyola Symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Reber, R. & Schwarz, N. (1999). Eff ects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8 (2), 338-342.10.1006/ccog.1999.0386Search in Google Scholar

Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fl uency on aff ective judgments. Psychological Science, 9 (1), 45-48.10.1111/1467-9280.00008Search in Google Scholar

Reder, L.M. & Kusbit, G.W. (1991). Locus of the Moses Illusion: Imperfect encoding, retrieval, or match? Journal of Memory and Language, 30 (4), 385-406.10.1016/0749-596X(91)90013-ASearch in Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de. (1916/1967). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, H.-J. (forthcoming). A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association.Search in Google Scholar

Shah, A.K. & Oppenheimer, D.M. (2007) Easy does it: Th e role of fl uency in cue weighting. Judgment and Decision Making, 2 (6), 371-379Search in Google Scholar

Shiffrin, R.M. & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 127-190.Search in Google Scholar

Sloman, S.A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (1), 3-22.10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3Search in Google Scholar

Song, H. & Schwarz, N. (2008a). If it’s hard to read, it’s hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science, 19 (10), 986-988.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.xSearch in Google Scholar

Song, H. & Schwarz, N. (2008b). Fluency and the detection of misleading questions: Low processing fluency attenuates the Moses illusion. Social Cognition, 26 (6), 791-799.10.1521/soco.2008.26.6.791Search in Google Scholar

Song, H. & Schwarz, N. (2009). If it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychological Science, 20 (2), 135-138.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02267.xSearch in Google Scholar

Stanovich, K.E. (2011). Rationality and the Reflective Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211 (4481), 453-458.Search in Google Scholar

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59 (4), 251-278.10.1086/296365Search in Google Scholar

Van Langendonck, W. (2007). Iconicity. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 394-418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Whitt lesea, B.W.A. & Leboe, J.P. (2000). The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: fluency, generation, and resemblance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129 (1), 84-106.Search in Google Scholar

Yue, C.L., Caster, A.D., & Bjork, R.A. (2013). When disfluency is - and is not - a desirable difficulty: the influence of typeface clarity on metacognitive judgments and memory. Memory and Cognition, 41 (2), 229-241. 10.3758/s13421-012-0255-8Search in Google Scholar