Dosimetric proprieties of FBX dosimeter for high energy photon and electron beams

[1] Gupta BL. Low-level dosimetric studies with the FeSO4–benzoic acid–xylenol orange system. In: Dosimetry in agriculture, industry, biology and medicine. Proceedings of a symposium organized by the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] 17021 April 1972; Vienna, Austria. Vienna: IAEA; 1973: 4210432.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Gupta BL, Gomathy KR. Consistency of ferrous sulfate-benzoic acid-xylenol orange dosimeter. Int J Appl Radiat Isot. 1974;25(11–12):509-513.10.1016/0020-708X(74)90077-5Search in Google Scholar

[3] Gupta BL, Bhat RM, Gomathy KR Suseela B. Radiation chemistry of the ferrous sulphate-benzoic acid-xylenol orange dosimeter. Radiat Res. 1978;75(2):269-277.10.2307/3574902Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Gupta BL, Kini UR, Bhat RM, Madhvanath U. Use of the FBX dosimeter for the calibration of cobalt-60 and high energy teletherapy machines. Phys Med Biol. 1982;27(2):235-245.10.1088/0031-9155/27/2/005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Gupta BL, Narayan GR, Bhat RM, Kini UR, et al. Use of the FBX dosimeter for the quality assurance of ⁶⁰Co and high-energy teletherapy machines by mail. Phys Med Biol. 1992;37(11):2095-2102.10.1088/0031-9155/37/11/006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Madhvanath U, Kini UR, Gupta BL. Calibration of brachytherapy sources using ferrous sulfate-benzoic acid-xylenol orange dosimeter. Int J Appl Radiat Isot. 1976;27(8):443-446.10.1016/0020-708X(76)90063-6Search in Google Scholar

[7] Semwal MK, Bansal AK, Thakur PK, Vidyasagar PB. In-vivo (entrance) dose measurements in external beam radiotherapy with aqueous FBX dosimetry system. J Med Phys. 2005;30(1):32-35.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Semwal MK, Bansal AK, Thakur PK, Vidyasagar PB. FBX aqueous chemical dosimeter for measurement of virtual wedge profiles. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008;9(2):206-210.10.1120/jacmp.v9i4.2809Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[9] IAEA. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, Technical Reports Series TRS-398; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[10] ISO. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement: International Organization for Standardization, ISO 1993.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Bhat AA, Choudhary D, Sarma A, et al. Response of an FBX dosimeter to high LET ⁷Li and ¹²C ions. Radiat Phys Chem. 2003;68(5):909-916.10.1016/S0969-806X(03)00112-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[12] Gupta BL, Nilekani SR. Ferrous ion oxidation by H, OH and H₂O₂ in aerated FBX dosimetry system. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1998;53(6):643-650.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Smith CW. Orthovoltage x-ray beams (0.5 mm-4.0 mm Cu HVL). Br J Radiol Suppl. 1996;25:24-38.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Jordan TJ. Megavoltage x-ray beams: 2-50 MV. Br J Radiol Suppl. 1996;25:62-109.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Brindha S, Rose JV, Sathyan S, et al. Modified ferrous ammonium sulfate benzoic acid xyelenol orange (MFBX) and thermoluminescent dosimeters – a comparative study. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47(11):N153-N158.10.1088/0031-9155/47/11/40312108783Search in Google Scholar

[16] Klassen NV, Shortt KR, Seuntjens J, Ross CK. Fricke dosimetry: the difference between G(Fe3+) for 60Co-rays and high-energy x-rays. Phys Med Biol. 1999 44(7): 1609-1624.10.1088/0031-9155/44/7/30310442700Open DOISearch in Google Scholar