[Aikin, Scott and J. Caleb Clanton (2010): Developing Group-Deliberative Virtues. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4): 409–422.10.1111/j.1468-5930.2010.00494.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, Elizabeth (2006): The Epistemology of Democracy. Episteme 3 (2): 9–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, Elizabeth (2008): An Epistemic Defense of Democracy: David Estlund’s Democratic Authority. Episteme 5 (1): 129–139.10.3366/E1742360008000270]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, Elizabeth (2011): Democracy, Public policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony. Episteme 8 (2): 144–64.10.3366/epi.2011.0013]Search in Google Scholar
[Aristotle (1998): Politics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bohman, James (2006): Deliberative Democracy and the Epistemic Benefits of Diversity. Episteme 3 (3): 175–191.10.3366/epi.2006.3.3.175]Search in Google Scholar
[Bohman, James and Henry Richardson (2009): Liberalism, Deliberative Democracy, and Reasons that All Can Accept. The Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (3): 253–274.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00330.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Chappell, Zsuzsanna (2011): Justifying Deliberative Democracy: Are Two Heads Always Wiser Than One? Contemporary Political Theory 10 (1): 78–101.10.1057/cpt.2010.8]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, Joshua (1986): An Epistemic Conception of Democracy. Ethics 97 (1): 26–38.10.1086/292815]Search in Google Scholar
[Coleman, Jules and John Ferejohn (1986): Democracy and Social Choice. Ethics 97 (1): 6–25.10.1086/292814]Search in Google Scholar
[Dewey, John (1984): The Public and Its Problems. The Later Works, 1925–1953, vol. 2, edited J. A. Boydston. Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dresser, Rebecca (2001): When Science Offers Salvation: Patient Advocacy and Research Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Druckman, James (2004): Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects. American Political Science Review 98 (4): 671–686.10.1017/S0003055404041413]Search in Google Scholar
[Dryzek, John (2010): Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562947.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Elster, John (1998): Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139175005]Search in Google Scholar
[Estlund, David (1993): Making Truth Safe for Democracy. The Idea of Democracy. Edited David Copp, Jean Hampton, and John Roemer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 71–100.]Search in Google Scholar
[Estlund, David (1997): Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Edited James Bohman and William Rehg. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Estlund, David (2008): Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400831548]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodin, Robert E (2008): Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547944.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodin, Robert and Christian List (2001): Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem. Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (3): 277–306.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gutmann, Amy and Dennis Thompson (1996): Democracy and Disagreement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Habermas, Jürgen (2006): Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory 16 (4): 411–426.10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hayek, Friedrich. A (1945): The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review 35 (4): 519–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Landemore, Helene (2012): Democratic Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691155654.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Lippmann, Walter (1925): The Phantom Public. The MacMillan Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knight, Jack, and James Johnson (2012): The Priority of Democracy: The Political Consequence of Pragmatism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mansbridge, Jane and John Parkinson, eds. (2012): Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy on Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mill, John Stuart (1972): On Liberty. Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government. Ed. H.B. Acton. J. M. Dent and Sons LTD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mill, John Stuart (1991): Considerations on Representative Government. On Liberty and Other Essays. Ed. John Gray. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hong, Lu and Scott Page (2004): Groups of Diverse Problem Solvers Can Outperform Groups of High-Ability Problem Solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101 (46):16385–16389.10.1073/pnas.0403723101]Search in Google Scholar
[Plato (2008): Republic. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rawls, John (1971): A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042605]Search in Google Scholar
[Schumpeter, Joseph A (1950): Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sen, Amartya (1999): Development as Freedom. New York: A. A. Knopf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sunstein, Cass (2003): Why Societies Need Dissent. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sunstein, Cass (2006): Deliberating Groups versus Prediction Markets (or Hayek’s Challenge to Habermas). Episteme 3 (3): 192–213.10.3366/epi.2006.3.3.192]Search in Google Scholar
[Surowiecki, James (2004): The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations. New York: Doubleday.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tetlock, Philip (2005): Expert Political Judgment: How Good is it? How Can we Know? Princeton: Princeton University Press]Search in Google Scholar
[Trout, J. D. (2009): The Empathy Gap: Building Bridges to the Good Life and the Good Society. New York: Penguin Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman (1981): The Framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211 (4481): 453–458.10.1126/science.7455683]Search in Google Scholar
[Warren, Mark and H. Pearse (2008): Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511491177]Search in Google Scholar
[Young, Iris Marion (2000): Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
