[Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. – Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumel, J. J. 1993. Handbook of avian anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium. – Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club (USA). no. 23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernard, N., Michelat, D., Raoul, F., Quéré, J-P., Delattre, P. & Giraudoux, P. 2010. Dietary response of Barn Owls (Tyto alba) to large variations in populations of Common Voles (Microtus arvalis) and European Water Voles (Arvicola terrestris). – Canadian Journal of Zoology 88(4): 416–426. DOI: 10.1139/Z10-01110.1139/Z10-011]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brusatte, S. L., O’Connor, J. K. & Jarvis, E. D. 2015. The origin and diversification of birds. – Current Biology 25(19): R888–R898. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.00310.1016/j.cub.2015.08.00326439352]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cramp, S. 1978. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 1. Ostrich to Ducks. – Oxford University Press, Oxford]Search in Google Scholar
[Coles, R. B., Guppy, A., Anderson, M. E. & Schlegel, P. 1989. Frequency sensitivity and directional hearing in the Gleaning Bat, Plecotus auritus (Linnaeus 1758). – Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 165(2): 269–280.10.1007/BF006192012746553]Search in Google Scholar
[Colwell, R. K. 2000. Rensch’s rule crosses the line: convergent allometry of sexual size dimorphism in hummingbirds and flower mites. – American Naturalist 156: 495–510. DOI: 10.1086/30340610.1086/30340629587514]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cracraft, J. 1981. Towards a phylogenetic classification of recent birds of the world (class Aves). – Auk 98: 681–714.]Search in Google Scholar
[del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. (eds.) 1999. Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 5. Barn-owls to Hummingbirds. – Lynx Edicions, Barcelona]Search in Google Scholar
[Derlink, M., Wernham, C., Bertoncelj, I., Kovács, A., Saurola, P., Duke, G. & Vrezec, A. 2018. A review of raptor and owl monitoring activity across Europe: its implications for capacity building towards pan-European monitoring. – Bird Study DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2018.144754610.1080/00063657.2018.1447546]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dyson, M. L., Klump, G. M. & Gauger, B. 1998. Absolute hearing thresholds and critical masking ratios in the European Barn Owl: a comparison with other owls. – Journal of Comparative Physiology A 182(5): 695–702.10.1007/s003590050214]Search in Google Scholar
[Ericson, P. G. P., Anderson, C. L., Britton, T., Elzanowski, A., Johansson, U., Källersjö, M., Ohlson, J. I., Parsons, T. J., Zuccon, D. & Mayr, G. 2006. Diversification of neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils. – Biological Letters 2: 543–547. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.052310.1098/rsbl.2006.0523183400317148284]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Feduccia, A. 1996. The origins and evolution of birds. – Yale University Press, New Haven]Search in Google Scholar
[Galeotti, P. & Sacchi, R. 2001. Turnover of territorial Scops Owls Otus scops as estimated by spectrographic analyses of male hoots. – Journal of Avian Biology 32(3): 256–262. DOI: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2001.320308.x10.1111/j.0908-8857.2001.320308.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Glue, D. & Scott, D. 1980. Breeding biology of the Little Owl. – British Birds 73(1): 167–180.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goffette, Q., Denis, M., Pöllath, N. & Van Neer, W. 2016. Change in historical range of the Ural Owl in Europe. – Belgian Journal of Zoology 146(1): 33–43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grant, P. R., Abbott, I., Schluter, D., Curry, R. L. & Abbott, L. K. 1985. Variation in the size and shape of Darwin’s finches. – Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 25(1): 1–39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1985.tb00384.x10.1111/j.1095-8312.1985.tb00384.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan P. D. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. – Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 1–9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hámori, D., Winkler, D. & Vadász, Cs. 2017. Demographic data on the Little Owl (Athene noctua) in Upper-Kiskunság (Hungary). – Ornis Hungarica 25(2): 11–22. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2017-001210.1515/orhu-2017-0012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hackett, S. J., Kimball, R. T., Reddy, S., Bowie, R. C. K., Braun, E. L., Braun, M. J., Chojnowski, J. L., Cox, W. A., Han, K-L., Harshman, J., Huddleston, Ch. J., Marks, B. D., Miglia, K. J., Moore, W. S., Sheldon, F. H., Steadman, D. W., Witt, Ch. C. & Yuri, T. 2008. A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. – Science 320: 1763–1768. DOI: 10.1126/science.115770410.1126/.1157704]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Holland, P. W. 1993. Avian skull. – In: Hanken, J. & Hall, B. K. (eds.) The Skull, Vol. 2. Patterns of Structural and Systematic Diversity. – University of Chicago Press, Chicago]Search in Google Scholar
[Horváth, A., Morvai, A. & Horváth, G. F. 2018. Food-niche pattern of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in intensively cultivated agricultural landscape. – Ornis Hungarica 26(1): 27–40. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2018-000210.1515/orhu-2018-0002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hounsome, T., O’Mahony, D. & Delahay, R. 2004. The diet of Little Owls Athene noctua in Gloucestershire, England. – Bird Study 51(3): 282–284. DOI: 10.1080/0006365040946136610.1080/00063650409461366]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kadochnikov, N. 1963. On the breeding biology of the Scops Owl in the Voronezh province. – Ornitologia 6: 104–110.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krüger, O. 2005. The evolution of reversed sexual size dimorphism in hawks, falcons and owls: a comparative study. – Evolutionary Ecology 19(5): 467–486. DOI: 10.1007/s10682-005-0293-910.1007/s10682-005-0293-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Laursen, J. T. 1981. Prey of the Little Owl (Athene noctua), East Jutland (Denmark). – Danish Ornithological Society Magazine 75(3–4): 105–110.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, Y. F. & Severinghaus, L. L. 2004. Sexual and seasonal differences in the diet of Lanyu Scops Owls based on fecal analysis. – Journal of Wildlife Management 68(2): 299–306. DOI: 10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0299:SASDIT]2.0.CO;210.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0299:SASDIT]2.0.CO;2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Marti, C. D. 1988. A long-term study of food-niche dynamics in the Common Barn Owl: comparisons within and between populations. – Canadian Journal of Zoology 66(8): 1803–1812. DOI: 10.1139/z88-26110.1139/z88-261]Search in Google Scholar
[Marti, C. D. 2010. Dietary trends of Barn Owls in an agricultural ecosystem in Northern Utah. – Wilson Journal of Ornithology 122(1): 60–67. DOI: 10.1676/09-025.110.1676/09-025.1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mayr, E. & Amadon, D. 1951. A classification of recent birds. – American Museum Novitates, American Museum of Natural History City of New York]Search in Google Scholar
[McGillivray, W. B. 1989. Geographic variation in size and reverse size dimorphism of the Great Horned Owl in North America. – Condor 91(4): 777–786. DOI: 10.2307/136806010.2307/1368060]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mikkola, H. 2014. Owls of the World – A Photographic Guide, 2nd edition. – Firefly Books Ltd., Buffalo, New York]Search in Google Scholar
[Milchev, B. 2015. Diet of Barn Owl Tyto alba in Central South Bulgaria as influenced by landscape structure. – Turkish Journal of Zoology 39(5): 933–940. DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1409-2410.3906/zoo-1409-24]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Milchev, B. & Spassov, N. 2017. First evidence for carrion-feeding of Eurasian Eagle-owl (Bubo bubo) in Bulgaria. – Ornis Hungarica 25(1): 58–69. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2017-000510.1515/orhu-2017-0005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mueller, H. C. 1990. The evolution of reversed sexual dimorphism in size in monogamous species of birds. – Biological Reviews 65: 553–585. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1990.tb01238.x10.1111/j.1469-185X.1990.tb01238.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mysterud, I. 2016. Range extensions of some boreal owl species: comments on snow cover, ice crusts, and climate change. – Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 48(1): 213–219. DOI: 10.1657/AAAR0015-04110.1657/AAAR0015-041]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Newton, I. (ed.) 2002. Ecology and conservation of owls. – Csiro Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia10.1071/9780643069886]Search in Google Scholar
[Nishikawa, K. C. 2002. Evolutionary convergence in nervous systems: insights from comparative phylogenetic studies. – Brain, Behavior and Evolution 59(5–6): 240–249. DOI: 10.1159/00006356110.1159/00006356112207081]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Norberg, R. Å. 1977. Occurrence and independent evolution of bilateral ear asymmetry in owls and implications on owl taxonomy. – Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 280(973): 375–408. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1977.011610.1098/rstb.1977.0116]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Norberg, R. Å. 1978. Skull asymmetry, ear structure and function, and auditory localization in Tengmalm’s Owl, Aegolius funereus (Linné). – Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 282(991): 325–410. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1978.001410.1098/rstb.1978.0014]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nybo, J. O. & Sonerud, G. A. 1990. Seasonal changes in diet of Hawk Owls Surnia ulula: importance of snow cover. – Ornis Fennica 67: 45–51.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olson, S. L. 1995. The genera of owls in the Asioninae. – Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 115(1): 35–39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Owens, I. P. F. & Hartley, I. R. 1998. Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are there so many different forms of dimorphism? – Proceedings of the Royal Society B 265: 397–407. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.030810.1098/rspb.1998.0308]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Papageorgiou, N. K., Vlachos, C. G. & Bakaloudis, D. E. 1993. Diet and nest site characteristics of Eagle Owl (Bubo bubo) breeding in two different habitats in north-eastern Greece. – Avocetta 17(1): 49–54.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pecsics, T., Laczi, M., Nagy, G. & Csörgő, T. 2017. The cranial morphometrics of the wildfowl (Anatidae). – Ornis Hungarica 25(1): 44–57. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2017-000410.1515/orhu-2017-0004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Penteriani, V., Gallardo, M. & Roche, P. 2002. Landscape structure and food supply affect Eagle Owl (Bubo bubo) density and breeding performance: a case of intra-population heterogeneity. – Journal of Zoology 257(3): 365–372. DOI: 10.1017/S095283690200096110.1017/S0952836902000961]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pérez-Camacho, L., García-Salgado, G., Rebollo, S., Martínez-Hesterkamp, S. & Fernández-Pereira, J. M. 2015. Higher reproductive success of small males and greater recruitment of large females may explain strong reversed sexual dimorphism (RSD) in the Northern Goshawk. – Oecologia 177(2): 379–387. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-3146-910.1007/s00442-014-3146-925424156]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pycraft, W. P. 1902. Contributions to the osteology of birds. Part II. Strigiiformes. – Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 20:1–46.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rohlf, F. J. 2010. TpsDig, version 2.16. – Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, USA]Search in Google Scholar
[Šálek, M., Chrenkova, M. & Kipson, M. 2013. High population density of Little Owl (Athene noctua) in Hortobagy National Park, Hungary, Central Europe. – Polish Journal of Ecology 61(1): 165–169.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sibley, C. G. & Ahlquist, J. E. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. – Yale University Press10.2307/j.ctt1xp3v3r]Search in Google Scholar
[Sonerud, G. A. 1986. Effect of snow cover on seasonal changes in diet, habitat, and regional distribution of raptors that prey on small mammals in boreal zones of Fennoscandia. – Ecography 9(1): 33–47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1986.tb01189.x10.1111/j.1600-0587.1986.tb01189.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sonerud, G. A. 1992. Search tactics of a pause-travel predator: adaptive adjustments of perching times and move distances by Hawk Owls (Surnia ulula). – Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30(3–4): 207–217.10.1007/BF00166705]Search in Google Scholar
[Tornberg, R., Mikkola, H. & Rytkönen, S. 2016. Morphometric sex determination of Great Grey Owls Strix nebulosa. – Ornis Norvegica 39: 6–10. DOI: 10.15845/on.v39i0.99110.15845/on.v39i0.991]Search in Google Scholar
[Uva, V., Päckert, M., Cibois, A., Fumagalli, L. & Roulin, A. 2018. Comprehensive molecular phylogeny of barn owls and relatives (Family: Tytonidae), and their six major Pleistocene radiations. – Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 125: 127–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.03.01310.1016/j.ympev.2018.03.01329535030]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Verwaijen, D., Van Damme, R. & Herrel, A. 2002. Relationships between head size, bite force, prey handling efficiency and diet in two sympatric lacertid lizards. – Functional Ecology 16(6): 842–850. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00696.x10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00696.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Volman, S. F. & Konishi, M. 1990. Comparative physiology of sound localization in four species of owls (Part 1 of 2). – Brain, Behavior and Evolution 36(4): 196–205. DOI: 10.1159/00011530710.1159/0001153072279234]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Voous, K. H. 1988. Owls of the Northern Hemisphere. – MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts]Search in Google Scholar
[Wink, M., Heidrich, P., Sauer-Gürth, H., El-Sayed, A-A. & Gonzalez, J. M. 2008. Molecular phylogeny and systematics of owls (Strigiformes). – In: König, C. & Weick, F. (eds.) Owls of the world, 2nd edition. – Christopher Helm, London, pp. 42–63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wink, M., El-Sayed, A. A., Sauer-Gürth, H. & Gonzalez, J. 2009. Molecular phylogeny of owls (Strigiformes) inferred from DNA sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b and the nuclear RAG-1 gene. – Ardea 97(4): 581–591. DOI: 10.5253/078.097.042510.5253/078.097.0425]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zelditch, M., Swiderski, D., Sheets, D. H. & Fink, W. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A primer: Elsevier Academic Press, Waltham, MA.]Search in Google Scholar