[1. OECD/NEA. (2007). Source term assessment, containment atmosphere control systems and accident consequences. (Report CSNI 87/135). Paris.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. OECD/NEA. (1999). SOAR on containment thermalhydraulics and hydrogen distribution. (Report NEA/CSNI(R) 99/16). Paris.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Preußer G., Freudenstein, K. F., & Reinders, R. (1996). Concept for the analysis of hydrogen problems in nuclear power plants after accidents. In Proceedings of the OECD/NEA/CSNI Workshop on the Implementation of Hydrogen Mitigation Techniques (pp. 113–127). Winnipeg, Manitoba.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Arnould, F., Bachellerie, E., & et al. (2001). State of the art on hydrogen passive autocatalytic recombiner. In Proceedings of the FIssion SAfety (FISA’2001). EU research in reactor safety. Luxembourg.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Bachellerie, E., Arnould, F., Auglaire, M., de Boeck, B., Braillard, O., Eckardt, B., Ferroni, F., & Moffett, R. (2003). Generic approach for designing and implementing a passive autocatalytic recombiner PAR-system in nuclear power plant containments. Nucl. Eng. Des., 221, 151–165.10.1016/S0029-5493(02)00330-8]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Reinecke, E. -A., Boehm, J., Drinovac, P., & Struth, S. (2005). Modeling of catalytic recombiners: Comparison of REKO-DIREKT calculations with REKO-3 experiments. In Proceedings of International Conference on Nuclear Energy for New Europe, September 5–8, 2005. Bled.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Reinecke, E. -A., Tragsdorf, I. M., & Gierling, K. (2004). Studies on innovative hydrogen recombiners as safety devices in the containments of light water reactors. Nucl. Eng. Des., 230, 49–59.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2003.10.009]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Levine, R. D. (2005). Molecular reaction dynamics. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614125]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Launder, B. E. (1978). Heat and mass transport. In P. Bradshaw (Ed.) Topics in applied physics: turbulence (Vol. 12). Berlin: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Kays, W. M., & Crawford, M. E. (1980). Convective heat and mass transfer. McGraw Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Tominaga, Y., & Stathopoulos, T. (2007). Turbulent Schmidt numbers for CFD analysis with various types of flowfield. Atmos. Environ., 41(37), 8091–8099.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.054]Search in Google Scholar
[12. CHEMKIN. (2000). Reaction design: TRANSPORT, a software package for the evaluation of gas-phase, multicomponent transport properties. CHEMKIN Collection Release 3.6. (Document No. TRA-036-1).]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Chapman, S., & Cowling, T. G. (1970). The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases: an account of the kinetic theory of viscosity, thermal conduction and diffusion in gases (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Dabbene, F., & Paillére, H. (2007). PARIS Benchmark Report. (CEA-Rapport DM2S – SMFE/LTMF/RT/07-003/A).]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Gera, B., Sharma, P. K., Singh, R. K., & Vaze, K. K. (2011). CFD analysis of passive autocatalytic recombiner and its interaction with containment atmosphere. BARC Newsletter, Founder’s Day Special Issue.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. AREVA Inc. (2011). AREVA passive autocatalytic recombiner. (Document No. G-008-V1PB-2011-ENG).]Search in Google Scholar
