[Allen, R. (1998) ‘This is not Television …’, in Steemers, J. (ed.) Changing Channels. The Prospects for Television in a Digital World. Luton: John Libbey Media.]Search in Google Scholar
[Allern, S. (1996) Kildens makt. Ytringsfrihetens politiske økonomi. Oslo: Pax Forlag A/S]Search in Google Scholar
[Andenæs, I. (2002) ‘Dagspresse’, in Bjørnstad, N. (ed.) Medienorge 2002. Fakta om norske massemedier. Kristiansand: IJ-Forlaget.]Search in Google Scholar
[Andrejevic, M. (2004) Reality TV: The Work of Being Watched. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakøy, E. & T. Syvertsen (eds.) (2001) Sjekking på TV. Offentlig ydmykelse eller bare en lek. En studie av Reisesjekken – programformtat, deltakere, produsenter, sponsorer og publikum. Oslo: Unipub forlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beyer, Y., G. Enli, A. Maasø & E. Ytreberg (2007) ‘Small Talk Makes a Big Difference. Recent Developments in Interactive, SMS-Based Television’, Television & New Media 8(3): 213-234.10.1177/1527476407301642]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruns, A. (2005) Gatewatching Collaborative online News Production. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Caldwell, J.T. (2000) ‘Introduction: Theorizing the Digital Landrush’, in Caldwell, J.T. (ed.) Electronic Media and Technoculture. New Brunswick (N.J.): Rutgers University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Couldry, N. (2000) The Place of Media Power: Pilgrims and Witnesses of the Media Age. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Docherty, D. (1995) ‘Confessions of a Justified Scheduler’, in Hargrave, A.M. (ed.) The Scheduling Game. London: John Libbey/Broadcasting Standards Council.]Search in Google Scholar
[Engelstad, M. (2003) ‘Makt i det norske samfunnet’, in Frønes, I. & L. Kjølsrød (eds.) Det norske samfunn. Oslo: Gyldendal Norske Forlag AS.]Search in Google Scholar
[Enli, G.S. (2002) ‘”På din side.” Folkelighet og alliansebygging i TV 2s aktualitetsprogram’, in Enli, G.S., T. Syvertsen & S. Østby Sæther (eds.) Et hjem for oss – et hjem for deg? Analyser av TV 2 1992-2002. Kristiansand: IJ-Forlaget.]Search in Google Scholar
[Enli, G.S. (2005) ‘Fenomenet SMS-TV. Institusjonelle strategier og semiprivate interaksjon’, Norsk Medietidskrift 12(2): 116-135.10.18261/ISSN0805-9535-2005-02-03]Search in Google Scholar
[Enli, G.S. (2007) The Participatory Turn in Broadcast Television. Institutional, Editorial and Textual Challenges and Strategies. PhD thesis submitted at the Department of Media and Communication, University of Oslo.]Search in Google Scholar
[Enli, G.S. & T. Syvertsen (2007) ‘Participation, Play and Socialising in New Media Environments’. To be published in Virginia Nightingale & Tim Dwyer (eds.) New Media Worlds. Challenges for Convergence. Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gans, H.J. (1980) Deciding What’s News. New York: Vintage Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grindstaff, L. (1997) ‘Producing Trash, Class and the Money Shot: A Behind-The-Scenes Account of Daytime TV Talk Shows’, in Lull, J. & S. Hinerman (eds.) Media Scandals: Morality and Desire in the Popular Culture Marketplace. Cambridge: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gripsrud, J. (1995) The Dynasty Years: Hollywood Television and Critical Media Studies. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hibberd, M., R. Kilborn, B. McNair, S. Marriott & P. Schlesinger (2000) Consenting Adults? Stirling Media Research Institute. London: Broadcasting Standards Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hujanen, T. (2002) The Power of Schedule. Tampere: Tampere University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacka, E. (2003) ‘”Democracy as Defeat” – The Impotence of Arguments for Public Service Broadcasting’, Television & New Media 4(2): 177-191.10.1177/1527476402250675]Search in Google Scholar
[Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence Culture. Where Old and New Media Collide. New York and London: New York University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jones, J. (2004) ‘Emerging Platform Identities: Big Brother UK and Interactive Multi-Platform Usage’, in Mathijs, E. & J. Jones (eds.) Big Brother International. Formats, Critics and Publics. London & New York: Wallflower Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Livingstone, S. & P. Lunt (1994) Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Livingstone, S. (1999) ‘New Media, New Audience?’, New Media & Society 1(1): 59-66.10.1177/1461444899001001010]Search in Google Scholar
[LPSPS (2004) Telecom Services Indicators 2004. Produced for the European Commission, DG Information Society. Available online: http://europa.eu.int/information_society/policy/ecomm/info_centre/documentation/studies_ext_consult/index_en.htm [03.04.06].]Search in Google Scholar
[Maasø, A., V.S. Sundet & T. Syvertsen (2007) “’Fordi de fortjener det’ – Publikumsdeltakelse som strategisk utviklingsområde i mediebransjen”, Norsk medietidsskrift 14(2): 126-154.10.18261/ISSN0805-9535-2007-02-03]Search in Google Scholar
[NRK (2005) NRKs allmennkringkastingsregnskap 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democracy Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720444]Search in Google Scholar
[Priest, P.J. (1995) Public Intimacies: Talk ShowPparticipants and Tell-all TV. Cresskill, NJ.: Hampton Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Qvortrup, L. (1991) ‘Publikums iscenesættelse’, in Jensen, J.F. (ed.) Analyser af tv og tv-kultur. København: Medusa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Roscoe, J. (2004) ‘Multi-Platform Event Television: Reconceptualising our Relationship with Television’, The Communication Review 7: 363-369.10.1080/10714420490886961]Search in Google Scholar
[Seiter, E. (1999) Television and New Media Audiences. London: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198711421.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Siapera, E. (2004) ‘From Couch Potatoes to Cybernauts? The Expanding Notion of the Audience on TV Channels’ Websites’, New Media & Society 6(2): 155-172.10.1177/1461444804041446]Search in Google Scholar
[Søndergaard, H. (2003) ‘Programfladestyring og organisationsforandringer i nordisk public service-fjernsyn’, Mediekultur 35: 5-22.10.7146/mediekultur.v19i35.1228]Search in Google Scholar
[SSB (2005) Norwegian Media Barometer 2004. Norwegian Statistic. Available online: http://www.ssb.no/emner/07/02/30/medie [20.09.05].]Search in Google Scholar
[Sundet, V.S. and E. Ytreberg (2006) ‘Born to Participate: Conceptions of the Active Participant in the Norwegian Media Industry’, paper presented at the 12th Norwegian Media Research Conference, Bergen 19-20 October 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[Syvertsen, T. & E. Ytreberg (2006) ‘Participation and Play in Converging Media: Institutional Perspective and Text-user Relations’, Nordicom Review 27(1): 107-110.10.1515/nor-2017-0223]Search in Google Scholar
[Syvertsen, T. (1992) Public Television in Transition. A Comparative Historical Analysis of the BBC and the NRK. Thesis, Department of Media and Communication, University of Oslo.]Search in Google Scholar
[Syvertsen, T. (2001) ‘Ordinary People in Extraordinary Circumstances: A Study of Participants in Television Dating Games’, Media, Culture & Society 23(3): 319-337.10.1177/016344301023003003]Search in Google Scholar
[Syvertsen, T. (2006) ’Public Television and Multi-platform Media Hybrids: Strategies for Involving Viewers and Generating New Revenue’, in Marcinkowski, F., W.A. Meier & J. Trappel (eds.) Media and Democracy. Experience from Europe. Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Haupt Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Whannel, G. (1990) ‘Winner Takes All: Competition’, in Goodwin, A. & G. Whannel (eds.) Understanding Television. London: Rutledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ytreberg, E. (2006) ‘Premeditations of Performance in Recent Live Television: A Scripting Approach to Media Production Studies’, European Journal of Cultural Studies 9(4): 421-440.10.1177/1367549406069066]Search in Google Scholar