Editor, Executive and Entrepreneur

Ansoff, H. Igor (1991). Critique of Henry Mintzberg’s ‘The Design School: Reconsidering the Basic Premises of Strategic Management’. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 449-461.10.1002/smj.4250120605Search in Google Scholar

Ansoff, H. Igor (1994). Comment on Henry Mintzberg’s ‘Rethinking Strategic Planning’. Long Range Planning, 27(3), 31-32.10.1016/0024-6301(94)90187-2Search in Google Scholar

Benner, Mary J., & Tushman, Michael L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256.10.5465/amr.2003.9416096Search in Google Scholar

Birkinshaw, Julian, & Gupta, Kamini (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 287-298.10.5465/amp.2012.0167Search in Google Scholar

Brews, Peter J., & Hunt, Michelle R. (1999). Learning to plan and planning to learn: Resolving the planning school/learning school debate. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 889-913.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199910)20:10<889::AID-SMJ60>3.0.CO;2-FSearch in Google Scholar

Brown, Shona L., & Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1-34.10.2307/2393807Search in Google Scholar

Cao, Qing, Gedajlovic, Eric, & Zhang, Hongping (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20: 781-796.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Sea-Jin, van Wittleloostuijn, Arjen, & Eden, Lorraine (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 178-184.10.1057/jibs.2009.88Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, Clayton M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Search in Google Scholar

De Visser, Matthias, de Weerd-Nederhof, Petra, Faems, Dries L., Song, Michael, van Looy, Bart, & Visscher, Klaasjan (2010). Structural ambidexterity in NPD processes: A firm-level assessment of the impact of differentiated structures on innovation performance. Technovation 30, 291-299.10.1016/j.technovation.2009.09.008Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Christina B., & Birkinshaw, Julian (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209-226.10.2307/20159573Search in Google Scholar

He, Zi-Lin, & Wong, Poh Kam (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organizational Science, 15, 481-494.Search in Google Scholar

Hair, Joseph F., Anderson, Rolph E., Tatham, Ronald L., & Black, William C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Jansen, Justin J., Vera, Dusya, & Crossan, Mary (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 5-18.10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008Search in Google Scholar

Jansen, Justin J., Tempelaar, Michiel P., van den Bosch, Frans A., & Volberda, Henk W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20, 797-811.10.1287/orsc.1080.0415Search in Google Scholar

Judge, William Q., & Blocker, Christopher P. (2008). Organizational capacity for change and strategic ambidexterity. Flying the plane while rewiring it. European Journal of Marketing, 42(9/10), 915-926.10.1108/03090560810891073Search in Google Scholar

Junni, Paulina, Sarala, Riika M., Taras, Vas, & Tarba, Shlomo Y. (2013) Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299-312.10.5465/amp.2012.0015Search in Google Scholar

Kohtamäki, Marko, Kautonen, Teemu, & Kraus, Sascha (2010). Strategic planning and small business performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 11(3), 221-229.10.5367/000000010792217263Search in Google Scholar

Krosnick, Jon A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 213-236.10.1002/acp.2350050305Search in Google Scholar

Levinthal, Daniel, & March, James G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (Special Issue), 95-112.10.1002/smj.4250141009Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Marianne W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760-776.10.5465/amr.2000.3707712Search in Google Scholar

Lubatkin, Michael H., Simsek, Zeki, Ling, Yan, Veiga, John F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32, 646-672.10.1177/0149206306290712Search in Google Scholar

March, James G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2, 71-87.10.1287/orsc.2.1.71Search in Google Scholar

Markides, Constantinos C. (2013). Business model innovation: What can the ambidexterity literature teach us? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 311-323.10.5465/amp.2012.0172Search in Google Scholar

Mintzberg, Henry (1991) Learning 1, Planning 0: Reply to Igor Ansoff. Strategic Management Journal 12, 463-466.10.1002/smj.4250120606Search in Google Scholar

Mintzberg, Henry (1994). Rethinking strategic planning, Part I: Pitfalls and fallacies. Long Range Planning, 27(3). 12–21.10.1016/0024-6301(94)90185-6Search in Google Scholar

Mom, Tom J. M., van den Bosch, Frans A. J., & Volderda, Henk W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 812-828.10.1287/orsc.1090.0427Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, Charles A., & Tushman, Michael L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, Charles A., & Tushman, Michael L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53, 1-18.10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, Charles A., & Tushman, Michael L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-33810.5465/amp.2013.0025Search in Google Scholar

Papachroni, Angeliki, Heracleous, Loizos, & Paroutis, Sotirios (2015). Organizational ambidexterity through the lens of paradox theory: Building a novel research agenda. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1-23.10.1177/0021886314553101Search in Google Scholar

Podsakoff, Philip M., & Organ, Dennis W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.10.1177/014920638601200408Search in Google Scholar

Podsakoff, Philip M., MacKenzie, Scott B., Lee, Jeong-Jeon, & Podsakoff, Nathan P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879Search in Google Scholar

Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 539-569.10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452Search in Google Scholar

Podsakoff, Philip M., Todor, William D., Grover, Richard A., & Huber, Vandra L. (1984). Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: Fact or fiction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(1), 1-63.10.1016/0030-5073(84)90036-9Search in Google Scholar

PricewaterhouseCoopers Global Media Outlook 2013-2017 (2012). Accessed online at: https://www.pwc.no/no/innsikt/entertainment-media/global-media-outlook-2013.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Raisch, Sebastian, & Birkinshaw, Julian (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375-409.10.1177/0149206308316058Search in Google Scholar

Raisch, Sebastian, Birkinshaw, Julian, Probst, Gilbert, & Tushman, Michael L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20, 685-695.10.1287/orsc.1090.0428Search in Google Scholar

Revilla, Elena, Rodríguez-Prado, Beatriz, & Prieto, Isabel (2009). Information technology as a knowledge management enabler in product development: Empirical evidence. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3), 346-363.10.1108/14601060910974228Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Wendy K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leader managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623.10.5465/amj.2011.0932Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Wendy K., & Lewis, Marianne W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381-403.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Wendy K., & Tushman, Michael L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16, 522-536.10.1287/orsc.1050.0134Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Wendy K., Binns, Andy, & Tushman, Michael (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 43, 448-461.10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.003Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Alva, & Helfat, Constance E. (2009). Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organizational Science, 20(4), 718-739.10.1287/orsc.1090.0429Search in Google Scholar

Teece David J., Pisano Gary, & Shuen, Amy (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-ZSearch in Google Scholar

Tushman, Michael, & Romanelli, Elaine (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7, (pp. 171-222), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tushman, Michael L., & O’Reilly, Charles A. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4): 8-30.Search in Google Scholar

Wilberg, Erik (2010). Mediaprospect 2011 – Analyses for the coming year. Oslo: BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo.Search in Google Scholar

Wilberg, Erik (2011). Mediaprospect 2012 – Analyses for the coming year. Oslo: BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo.Search in Google Scholar

Wilberg, Erik (2012). Mediaprospect 2013 – Analyses for the coming year. Oslo: BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo.Search in Google Scholar