[Andreoni, J. 1991. “Reasonable Doubt and the Optimal Magnitude of Fines: Should the Penalty Fit the Crime ?” RAND Journal of Economics 22(3), 385–395.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biandi, T. and V. Guidi. 2010. The Comparative Survey on the National Public Procurement Systems Across the PNN. Autority for supervising public contracts. S. p. A. Roma.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bose, P. 1995. “Regulatory errors, optimal fines and the level of compliance. Journal of Public Economics.” 56 (3), 475–484.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bovis, Ch. (ed.). 2016. Research Handbook on European Public Procurement. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781781953266]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooter, R. and Th. Ulen. 2011. Law and Economics. 6th edn. Pearson Series in Economics. New York: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Domberger, S. and S. Rimmer. 1994. “Competitive Tendering and Contracting in the Public Sector: A Survey.” International Journal of the Economics of Business 1, 439–453.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commision. 2014. Public Procurement Indicators 2012. Brussels: European Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[Friedman, D. D. 2000. Law’s Order. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Graells, A. S. 2015. “New Rules for Health Care Procurement in the UK: A Critical Assessment from the Perspective of EU Economic Law.” Public Procurement Law Review 24, 16–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hastie, R. and R. N. Dawes. 2010. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World: The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. London: SAGE.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jurčík, R. 2014. Veřejné zakázky a koncese. 2nd edn. Praha: C. H. Beck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuhlman, J. R. and S. R. Johnson. 1983. “The Number of Competititors and Bid Prices.” Southern Economic Journal 50(1), 213–220.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lahr, M. L. and E. Dietzenbacher (eds). 2001. Input-Output Analysis: Frontiers and Extensions. London: Palgrave.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leontief, W. W. 1986. Input-Output Economics. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1072-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Lott, J. R. Jr. 1996. “The Level of Optimal Fines to Prevent Fraud When Reputations Exist and Penalty Clauses are Unenforceable.” Managerial and Decision Economics 17(4), 363–380.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lundsgaard, J. 2002. “Competition Efficiency in Publicy Funded Service.” OECD Economic Studies 35, 79–128.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikušová Meričková, B. and J. Nemec. 2013. “Contract Management and its Impact on Contracting Public Services: Slovak Republic.” Ekonomický časopis 61(7), 690–699.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, R. E. and P. D. Blair. 1985. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Cambridge: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ministry for Regional Development. (2015). Výroční zpráva o stavu veřejných zakázek v České republice za rok 2014. Prague: Ministry for Regional Development.]Search in Google Scholar
[Motchenkova, E. 2008. “Determination of Optimal Penalties for Antitrust Violations in Dynamic Setting.” European Journal of Operational Research 189(1), 269–291.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemec, J. and M. Grega. 2015. “Factors Influencing Final Price of Public Procurement: Evidence from Slovakia.” Procedia Economics and Finance. Praha: Elsevier B. V., 543–551.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemec, J, M. Grega, M. Orviská and M. Šumpíková. 2015. “Selected factors determining the performance of the Czech public procurement system”. In Hájek, P., Mumanachyt, P. and Jone, A. M (eds.). Conference Proceedings: CBU International Conference. Praha: Central Bohemia University Praha, 242–247.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemec, J., F. Ochrana, J. Pavel and V. Šagát. 2010. Kontrola ve veřejné správě. Praha: Wolters Kluver.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemec, J., M. Šumpíková, S. Klazar and M. Grega. 2014. “Efficiency versus Economy in Public Procurement.” In T. Löster and T. Pavelka (eds). Conference Proceedings: The 8thInternational Days of Statistics and Economics. Praha: Melandrium, 1054–1063.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niskanen, W. A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niskanen, W. A. 1994. Bureaucracy and Public Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ochrana, F. and J. Pavel. 2013. “Analysis of the Impact of Transparency, Corruption, Openness in Competion and Tender Procedures on Public Procurement in the Czech Republic.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 7(2), 116–137.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavel, J. 2009. Efektivnost fungování kontrolních systémů veřejných zakázek v České republice. Praha: Transparency International.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, M. 2014. “Pokuty za správní delikty ve veřejných zakázkách: ekonometrický model.” Acta oeconomica pragensia: vědecký sborník Vysoké školy ekonomické v Praze 2014(6), 35–50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, H. A. 1959. “Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science.” American Economic Review 49(3), 253–283.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, H. A. 1947. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York. The Macmillan Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soukopová, J. and I. Malý. 2013. “Competitive Environment in Waste Management and its Impact on Municipal Expenditures.” Acta universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 61(4), 1113–1119.]Search in Google Scholar
[Strand, I., P. Ramada and E. Canton et al. 2011. Public procurement in Europe: Cost and Effectiveness. Brussels: European Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[Špalková, D., J. Špalek and J. Nemec. 2015. “Performance Management and Performance Appraisal: Czech Self-Governments.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy. Special Issue: Towards Meaningful Measurement: Performance Management at the Cross roads of Internal Efficiency and Social Impacts 8(2), 69–88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice Science.” New Series 211(448), 453–458.]Search in Google Scholar
[Williamsson, O. 1981. “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Costs Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 87(3), 548–577.]Search in Google Scholar
[Williamsson, O. 1991. “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives.” Administrative Science Quarterly 36(2), 269–296.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zákon 273/1996 Sb. dne 11. října 1996 o působnosti Úřadu pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zákon č. 99/1963 Sb., občanský soudní řád, ve znění pozdějších předpisů.]Search in Google Scholar
